>Okay, we can repeal the 19th Amendment, but only if women don’t have to pay taxes anymore. No taxation without representation. Deal?Do you accept /pol/?: https://x.com/JulieBorowski/status/2092022549739708745
If the deal is women go back to being property, than we accept
>>541384206Yes
>>541384206Kek she got you, tardcels
>>541384206Of course we do. Because once they lose the voting franchise, we can also vote them out of the workplace and force them to rely on marriage to survive - like the good old days. When people talk about how modern women have no survival instincts, this is an example of that very phenomenon.
Ok you can have equal rights, but only if you also get militarily conscripted. Deal?
>>541384206lol, women are a net drain even when paying taxes (and don't forget they are behind 80% of consumer spending and are generally debt sponges) taking them out of decision making would offset the hypothetical loss in less than a year. not to mention that if they could no longer take out loans without the responsible mans permission you'd see their personal economies thrive too.
>>541384206Why would women pay taxes when they don’t have control of any money?
>>541384206How was it done in the past?
>>541384206children pay taxes when they work as grocery baggers and whatnot
anyway, deal, let's repeal the 16th and the 19th at the same time :D
>lol
>>541385494Yep I started working at 14 and paid taxes the whole time
>>541384206Id accept that.
>>541384206That would not lose the treasury that much desu.
>>541384206I accept, and also I'm going to continue to push for nobody to pay taxes as well.
>>541384206That wouldn't go the way she thinks it would. Say we accept that.>Men vote to remove most social benefits that mostly benefit women>Men vote to either directly or indirectly remove women from the workforce>Men vote to promote motherhood and benefit those women choosing to have 3+ kids>Men vote to close bordersSounds great to me.
>>541384206They need to be in chains
>>541384206>property isnt entitled to wagesKek cant tax what isnt there
>>541384206sure but only if representation also requires taxation, aka no poorfags voting
>>541384206K
>>541384206Of course we wouldn't tax women duh?
>>541384780>>541384206Deal!First order of business, a vote to prohibit women from leaving the house, going online, reading nonsense, and communicating with retarded and malicious "friends"
>>541384206Deal
>>541384206You'll still pay sales tax no matter what, and sense you're all pigs addicted to useless junk, thats fine.
Absolutely.
>>541385563What's that trying to say
>>541384890How? Women would be property again and therefore have no right to work without the approval of their husband or father, thus they wouldn't be paying taxes. I'm okay with this. It is an agreeable solution. Men would go back to work and take care of the tax deficit, also production would increase and everything would be better.
>>541384206>Women shouldn't voteThat's only half the battle. Of course Women should lose the right to vote but fags conveniently leave out how we have to deny the vote from poors and landless men. Giving a voice to those who have no stakes in the success of their country is also a big contributor to the mess we are in.
>>541384206women are going to be the only ones who vote either way.
>>541386138Just ignore it, it's a spambot. If it had anything important to say it can make its own thread and explain itself.
>>541385210Exactly. This deal is the best there could be>take our rights away BUT we no longer pay taxes!Things would only get better. They're a net drain anyway. Men are already functionally the only ones paying taxes anyway.
>>541386175>landless menSo you want to live in a Corporatocracy. If land ownership determines right to vote you can be sure multinational corporations will just buy everything and then take your right to even own land.
>>541386175>landless menwhat about people who's property is an appartment?
>>541386175those two things aren't skin in the game. we had what we called marsh-men here, who bought the minimum amount of land as cheaply as possible with no intention of developing the land. also, the rich make money of money that isn't even invested in the home country. same goes with children, the wealthy very often have residencies or dual citizenships. skin in the game becomes a lot trickier in a globalized world. what is needed is an aptitude test in combination with something that ties your success to the country, there's a myriad of solutions here instead of reverting back to softboi burgeousie thinking. Jesus, fucking Blackrock, Blackstone and Vanguard would selectively buy up land to keep their political opponents locked out of voting lol. I could be rich with children living on my land while I short my own country and run off to Portugal on a golden visa if things look bad, my assets are borderless and permissionless after all. Or, any man could be put to through a test decided upon by plebicite, after which he could enter a position of power where he is held accountable by his results. Right now the test is whether or not you can suck enough jewish and lobbyist cock.
>>541384206100% deal. >>541385046he hit it on the head. this will never happen though, and if it does it wont really solve any of our problems. It doesn't matter whos on the ballot they are always jewish approved, and the feminists who are the most politically active are their male cucks. What we need is women off the internet.
>>541386428>multinational corporations will just buy everythingDon't allow foreigners to buy land in othet countries, easy.>>541386684Renters can't vote. Landlord's can because the have a stake in the welfare of the country.
>>541386930>Renters can't vote.they pay taxes though.So just because they were born too late to buy a house for 30k, they are less than you?you boomers are delusional
>>541384206Ok.
>>541387020>they pay taxesSo do land owners and they are the only ones working for the good of their nation's
>>541384206Your terms are acceptable.
>>541385828shhh, let her cook (literally)
>>541386930>>541387020voter IQ tests. jesus you niggas are stupid. If you only let land owners vote the government will get twice as jewish over night.
>>541387278>IQ testIf you are wealthy and own land then that's enough proof of intelligence. Poor people aren't smart.
>>541384206Women don’t pay taxes anyways
>>541387388>only kikes and boomers own land mostlyI see...
>>541385461In the past women generally didn't pay taxes. Rare exeptions aside, they had neither income nor properties to pay taxes on.
>>541385494Yeah, and they shouldn't
>>541387529>Durrr I need da gooberment to spend money to test everyone before they vote. Just cut out the middleman. You don't need a quiz to determine who are the hardest working and most intelligent in society.
timmy gave them rightstimmy gave them rightstimmy gave them rights
>>541384206This bitch thinks she is smart with that proposition. Who wouldn't accept that deal...
>>541387529I'm a landowner millennial and all of my millenial peers own homes. The conservative ones anyways. I see no problem with removing the power from city voters.
>israel gets half the money>mens wages doublethe horror
OK, they shouldn't be working anyways
>>541384206theyre driving a hard bargain
Women are already a net negative. Men pay taxes. Repeal the 19th.
>>541387668>>541387827you guys will find out who owns the most land very quickly when a bill shows up to dissolve freedom of speech and gun rights that gets pushed through immediately. Also funding to israel will double and women will somehow be able to vote again within a year.
Also women are represented by their men. Also "no taxation without representation" isn't a thing.
>>541384206what a retarded take. with no voting power, you don't have incentive to work. so you wouldn't need to be taxed anyhow.
>>541387827ThisI don't want women to vote because their role has always been at the home. But I don't want useless, whiny men to continue to have a say for a country they won't even try and succeed in.
>>541387020You can buy a cheap ass plot of pland if you want the vote
Counter offer and hear me out...Do what your told, or get shot.Or "re educated" after a nice wash (fire hosing).50+ years of woman having 0/1000 level ideas = no more rights I don't give a flying shit if they like it or not.Or deal with radical western (((islam)))No rights, get beaten and raped.Uprising anyone debates these bleating "woman" at all.
>>541387020I think he's infering buy some shitty piece of land only good as a temporary stay or a storage shed.Really its not about keeping the "poor" out its about keeping the ghetto and the crack heads out.
>>541388241again you live in this fantasy world where jews and soi bois dont come from a wealthy background. The left/right wealth gaps heavily favors the left. don't listen to their propaganda or look at the golems. ALL the male feminists and serious leftists I've met IRL were set to become millionaires when their parents croak.
>>541387278Hitler had a solution to this. Some say it was final... That's a joke but I'm sure there are way's around this.
>>541384206Deal, but that also means they can’t work outside the home. We’re not letting you steal our jobs through DEI and then let you not pay taxes, that’s some bullshit
>>541387706Nobody alive today gave them rights Fecesjeet.
>>541388544thats actually easy, if you enforce laws we already have about non citizens and felons voting. but getting women off the internet too will help.>>541388639>>541388408epically based
>>541387827>>541387388We completely understand you guys, that's not the point we're making here. You'd need a whole slew of other judicial reforms to go along with this because first of, there is ample historical precedence that shows men will find loopholes, like living at moms while owning the required land in Alaska or Saskatchewan. Secondly is that private entities, which are owned by shareholder and ran by a board have interests at odds with the state. This means that large companies can and most likely will use this to their economic and political benefit, at your expense. And let's get real here, what amount of ownership are we talking? If it's "land" I will buy a square inch, if it's value I'll buy the cheapest possible. But you personally will set the bar one square inch and cent below what you have yourself. So what if it isn't you who get to decide how much land it is, but the people on the board of a hedgefund?Or are you just trolling?
>>541388573>Lefties are richWrong. Success is a privilege earned soley by the right.
>>541384890Why? I agreeNot like their taxes matterd anyway. They were a net negative and if they are forced outof the workforce too it wont be a problem anymore either.Sure they can buy groceries tax free but thats based because it supports the traditional household
>>541388886oh fuck who gottem>>541388888
>>541384206no taxes for women but also no welfare and the government would probably be better off
>>541384206only if women leave the workforce and start reproducing
>>541384206That'd be a fine deal. Get these borderline retards out of the workplace and back into the fucking kitchen. After countless years of doing nothing else, they can't even get that right.>Make women property againShit, tax men for owning women instead of taxing the women. Even that would be a better deal and launch the entire planet into a new golden age.
>>541388802>what does it mean to own landA property that you legally own and physically live on and/or operate your buisness on>we need more reformsAgreed.The issue with these threads is that its filled with lazy neets who only want women to lose the vote because they think that it would force women to marry them. A lot of these neets also larp that "well if I had a wife THEN I would feel like getting a job!"The majority of these losers would still be a useless drain on society, they would be the new woman demanding that the government fixes all their problems.
>>541389075>>541389112>>541388886this a fun larp thread but you guys dont want most of these cunts raising kids. kind of like how you can't really train a dog once it's been dominant over the owner for long enough
>>541384206Sounds like a great deal.> So when only men get drafted, they no longer have to pay taxes.We are free, guys.
>>541389235They're just babysitters, though. Children need a good mother who is submissive to her husband. This is how values are passed on, and women kept in their place.
>>541389176I sold my property to start my business because I didn't want to live in the suburbs, and It didn't make enough income. now I probably make double what you do (could make more but I hate working too much). Owning stuff doesn't make you intelligent, and nobody wants to participate in the rat race because it sucks and its a waste of your life. taking the vote away from people you're pea sized boomer brain doesn't like will only make things worse because you are too basic to understand trickery. Every time you guys are allowed to influence something you play right into their hands. most younger people have this problem too because of social media but TV was way worse compared. I'm a monarchist and don't believe normies should have any say in how the government works. thats pretty much the way things are, the big elections are all fake and mostly a way profile people and divide and conquer. democracy was never a good idea to begin with.
>>541384206Yeah that's fine. Income tax is unconstitutional anyway. No entitlements or daycare jobs either.
>>541384206Instantly.
>>541384206Deal. Women don't functionally pay taxes anyways. Over their lives much like all the various types of subhumans they consume more in government services than they contribute. The thing that you forgot was that their father or husband was responsible for paying their taxes before sufferage was passed. How do you plan to make that work when the majority of single men have absolutely no intention of ever marrying?
>>541384206Deal, and women can't be allowed to work because all profits have to be taxed, unless ypu are willing to remove all income tax as well, which is what I want.
>>541385461In the past there was no income tax at all, no sales tax, only imports and fruit bearing land was taxed.
>>541384206Deal, then the following year we'll hold a vote that restores the taxes. No women to vote against it and it passes with 80% of the vote.Are women really this dumb?
>>541386005>First order of business, a vote to prohibit women from leaving the house, going online, reading nonsense, and communicating with retarded and malicious "friends"Even with only men voting, this wouldn't pass. More of the country is progressive than not. You guys are literally just a loudmouthed minority on a containment site where you can use the n-word. And you wouldn't be able to vote because mommy can't drive you to the polls once her license is revoked.
>>541391545>Are women really this dumb?That's possible, but then some simp would inevitably come along and change it again for some pussy. That's all anything is about. Just powerful men getting laid. Nothing else matters.
>>541384206Women are a net drain on the budget, sounds even better.
>>541384206>BorowskiRetarded leftist Polish bitches are actually the worst.Also: you won't have time to earn anything or pay taxes. You'll be too busy making a baby or birthing a baby.
>>541384206Believe it or not, the right doesn’t think women should be tax cattle for Jews.
>>541384206That just means men will have women buy them everything. We need to go back to no taxes on income and land ownership
>>541385958Yeah how can you tax women when they will be largely barred from most industries? Can’t tax wages when they aren’t making wages lolThe only jobs that will be allowed for women are waitresses and nurses. And I’m fine with those being non-taxable
>>541384206Sounds good to me
>>541391810Just cattle. All women are for is motivation and reproduction. They no longer motivate or want to reproduce, so fuck them.
>>541384206>Deal?>One punch KOhttps://youtube.com/watch?v=II5CGK8NzVAWhitey, just do it. DO IT.
>>541384206Deal. What a small price to pay.
>>541384206>women can no longer vote>in exchange for women no longer paying taxes100% deal, immediately. Where do I sign?
>>541384206Fuck yeah. No demerit whatsoever.Has to be well communicated though, as in: this only applies to income tax, consumption has to still be taxed for obvious logistic reasons.
Imagine caring what holes think
>>541391632You're on for a rude awakening, sweety
>>541392257Pretending to care is how you get in the hole, though.>Treat queens like whores>Treat whores like queens
>>541384206On behalf of all men, we accept this proposition
