[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: videoplayback+(1).webm (2.77 MB, 800x1408)
2.77 MB
2.77 MB WEBM
Kek, that's actually a pretty good point
>>
comedians are cancer. imagine getting on stage just to huff their own farts
>>
>>541389331
It's sad that people skip over his argument and go straight to haranguing him
>>
>>541389331
Why's he looks so tiny?
>>
Where are the bloody jokes? He is asking a reasonable question but it's not a joke.
>>
>>541389331
>the men laughing
>the cunt holes going "uhh he's such a racist pig i hope my jew masters don't think i agree with the chud please give me more black cock to suck"
LMAO
>>
>>541389333
it's not an argument, it's the picture of the guy painting cardboard cutout demons and then laying down and crying.
this isn't what happened at all
>>
THIS SUMMER
ROB SCHNEIDER IS
THE CHUD
>>
>>541389336
Extremely virginal and embarrassing post my man
>>
>222775099(You)
Concern trolling jew: The Post
>>
>>541389336
>he cunt holes
You sound like a well adjusted, mentally stable adult.
>>
>>541389337
Tell me how an open statement to focus on diversity over ability is a cardboard demon.
>>
>>541389335
THANK YOU. Christ the clapping seals are as bad as the ROIPED astroturfers
>>
>>541389335
It's the hicks/carlin style "comedy"
>>
>>541389337
I think you'll find it's you who has painted cardboard demons and is on the floor crying
>>
>>541389335
>"I'm sick and tired of flying all the time withe these white pilots landing safely and on time. Boring!"
That is a sarcastic joke by definition.
>>
>>541389335
It's a sermon, not a comedy act.
>>
File: 1787478659058747.jpg (178 KB, 572x722)
178 KB JPG
I hope mutts realise that it would crash the mutt tourist sector if the world believed that was systematically shoehorning D. E. I. into its airlines... And coming at a time when it in $40T+ of unrepayable debt, it would just be another nail in a casket that's already looking like a porcupine.
>>
>>541389331
All he's really doing is teaching these sad, pathetic old boomers to laugh at their own replacement and the destruction of their own children.

It's not a laughing matter, it's not the time for fucking JOKES.

You're not supposed to respond to systematic and open demographic replacement with sardonic wit and a wry smile.

When they're dragging you feet-first to the incinerator, you'd better come up with something a little bit better than a witty comeback.
>>
>>541389332
Post troponin and D-dimer results. I'll wait...
>>
>>541389349
The irony of a Jew trying to wake brain-dead, obese gentiles to their own destruction at the hands other Jews, has so many layers of deliciousness that it would give baby cock blood a run for its shekels... It's like history repeating itself for the 110th time.
>>
>>541389350
>troponin
Trop I, Trop T or Trop C? Fucking larpers...
>>
>>541389351
Some ethnic jews looked at the talmud, said "no this is fucking evil" and denounced it. Not as common as it should be but it happens
>>
>>541389331
The dude gets money to come on to stage and speak the truth as if it was a joke. Best job ever.
>>
>>541389331
United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby did publicly say that United wanted to increase diversity among its pilots. In 2021, United announced a goal of training 5,000 new pilots by 2030, with at least 50% of the trainees being women or people of color. United still describes that goal on its corporate leadership page.

So if by “prioritize diversity when hiring pilots” you mean United intentionally sought to recruit more women and people of color, then yes, that's accurate.

However, that's different from saying Kirby said United would hire less-qualified pilots because of race or sex. I don't find evidence of him saying that. United's stated program was primarily about recruitment and training, including scholarships and outreach to historically Black colleges and universities.

There's also a relevant recent development: in February 2026, the FAA required U.S. airlines to certify that pilot hiring is merit-based. Reuters reported that United had previously had the 50%-diversity training goal, but there was no evidence that United or another airline had hired unqualified pilots.
>>
>>541389344
not preachy enough and I say this as someone who still likes both of them
>>
File: FGmGRHYX0AklKqs.jpg (25 KB, 303x515)
25 KB JPG
>>541389355
>United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby did publicly say that United wanted to increase diversity among its pilots. In 2021, United announced a goal of training 5,000 new pilots by 2030, with at least 50% of the trainees being women or people of color. United still describes that goal on its corporate leadership page.
>So if by “prioritize diversity when hiring pilots” you mean United intentionally sought to recruit more women and people of color, then yes, that's accurate.
>However, that's different from saying Kirby said United would hire less-qualified pilots because of race or sex. I don't find evidence of him saying that. United's stated program was primarily about recruitment and training, including scholarships and outreach to historically Black colleges and universities.
>There's also a relevant recent development: in February 2026, the FAA required U.S. airlines to certify that pilot hiring is merit-based. Reuters reported that United had previously had the 50%-diversity training goal, but there was no evidence that United or another airline had hired unqualified pilots.
>>
>>541389331
Thank you, I LOLed. gonna repost on my wall.
>>
>>541389357
>>541389355
He jak'd you good. There's no coming back from this
>>
>>541389331
Funny guy.
>>
>>541389337
So tell me, what actually happens if companies hire for "diversity"?
>>
>>541389355
>However, that's different from saying Kirby said United would hire less-qualified pilots because of race or sex. I don't find evidence of him saying that.

Yeah because the trainees aren't gonna be any less qualified when being chosen primarely for sex and race right?

Dishonest pieces of shit.
>>
>>541389340
>Jew
You're defending Rob fucking Schneider you caricature of a human being.
>>
>>541389345
>NO U
Masterful retort.
>>
>>541389334
Because he is. He's a half jew, quarter flip mystery meat man.
>>
>>541389348
I hope you realize the nonsensical wordsalad you just spewed out.
>>
>>541389363
>Rob fucking Schneider
is based af. You speak of him with respect.
>>
>>541389332
Being a comedian is the hardest job in the world.
>>
>>541389331
I'm Indian and I'm in Texas getting my pilots license.
>>
>>541389367
He's the jewest jew in jewllywood, you absolue ass clown. He adopted this right wing grift because his career was dead.
>>
>>541389370
His career died when he came out against vaccines. He's a hack comedian but an OG in that regard.
>>
>>541389335
at the end but i agree it took far too long to get there
>>
File: stew.jpg (205 KB, 1500x2249)
205 KB JPG
>OI, excuuuse me! Are you sayin' political correctness has gone too far??
>>
DUDE POLITICS LMAO
>>
It would be funnier and more honest if he just said he didn't want niggers flying planes
>>
File: 1775193041337038.png (152 KB, 640x474)
152 KB PNG
>it's funny because its true
>>
>>541389373
kek
>>
>>541389364
It's true, too.
>>
>>541389337
Damn I guess the meme is true, leftist beliefs and arguments hinge primarily on ignoring the reality in front of them. An airline literally stated they'll focus on the diversity of new pilot hires, meaning they'll ignore better candidates if they're not diverse enough. That's not an empty statement about how they'll broaden their search to include diverse groups. That means they will literally prioritize hiring someone who is from a group they consider diverse, regardless of whether their skills are inferior to another pilot.
>>
>>541389335
Get on this guy's level.
>>
>>541389370
He's so fn based and you're so mad about it. I only ask that you don't take your frustration out on others by blowing yourself, or anything else, up. The 72 virgins thing isn't real.
>>
>>541389335
Just describing reality is the joke
>>
>>541389331
Still funnier than his movies
>>
This is comedy?
>>
>>541389339
>>541389341
uh oh! the foidbrained homos are posting
>>
File: thinking-pepe.gif (60 KB, 640x640)
60 KB GIF
>>541389355
if the female and brown pilots are just as good then why not just stick to hiring the best pilots you can find?
>>
i always preferred a drunken vietnam vet to be my pilot
>>
>trying to cancel him because you don't like his jokes
This thread is evil. You're literally demic avatars.
>>
>>541389355
Thanks GPT.

But it begs the question, what's the fucking point?
>>
>>541389355
Ultimately setting quotas means you'll inevitably force yourself into a situation where you have to choose between two qualified people and you'll end up choosing based on race or sex.
>>
>>541389331
It genuinely, unironically is. Did you post this with that statement being meant sarcastically?
Hiring for ANYTHING being guided by """diversity""" a combination of both racist & patently retarded. Hiring pilots, of all fucking things, based on that is ao outright laughably psychotic that it staggers me that it is or has ever been a thing that really happened. Leftists are genuinely moon-howling lunatics & retards and they'll genuinely get innocent people killed because of it.
>>
>>541389331
Is this racist¿
>>
>>541389345
gotem
>>
>>541389335
>>541389343
>>541389344
>>541389347
The "joke" is that leftists propritized IdPol shit, i.e. "diversity", over actual skill & merit for fucking airline pilots. How is that not ridiculous & absurd?
The fact that it's true doesn't stop something from being laughable.
>>
>>541389349
Spreading awareness, by any means, is inherently helpful. Comedy is as valid a means as any.
More people need to know about this shit.
>>
>>541389394
>>541389395
true
>>
>>541389355
>there was no evidence that United or another airline had hired unqualified pilots
Stating that your goal in hiring is """diversity""" is inherently an admission that they hired underqualified pilots, or were going to. By """diversity""" even being a factor, let alone a goal, it inherently establishes that merit & skill is not the primary deciding factor. Leftists like to play bullshit word-games about this and claim nonsense like "omg they can prioritize BOTH!" but that's simply logically not true. If you're hiring based on anything other than qualification, you're it prioritizing qualification, by definition.
>>
>>541389389
The point is, as always with leftsist, the same: To obfuscate the truth while ACTUALLY doing the exact thing they're being accused of but providing enough obfuscation to muddy the waters enough to confuse some people.
>>
>>541389397
>Leftists like to play bullshit word-games about this and claim nonsense like "omg they can prioritize BOTH!" but that's simply logically not true
Exactly, if their diversity goal is 50/50, or 75/25, or anything, then it's extremely unlikely their recruitment on merit will give their desired ratio.
So they either abandon the quota, or abandon the merit-based recruitment. One has to give.
>>
>>541389331
This is terrible but could probably be funny if executed properly. I could see a delivery like Norm's Bill Cosby joke working.
>>
>>541389355
If "diverse" pilots ARE in fact "just as good" as the White male pilots, then why the fuck would there even need to be any emphasis placed on "diversity"? If the "diverse" pilots are just as good, then they would have no issue being selected and passed by the skill & merit-based selection process.
>>
File: 1766089177880322.png (38 KB, 290x314)
38 KB PNG
She didn't get the joke
>>
>>541389331
Boy, OP picked the WRONG clip/a comedian talking about the WRONG topic to try and push the "non-woke comedians aren't le funnay!"-narrative with.
Literally no sane person is going to side against Schnider on this topic, nor side against DEI and race-quotas in hiring airline pilots, of all things, isn't utterly laughable le wokeoid insanity.
>>
>>541389331
Rob hasn't been funny in decades don't validate his lack of skill because he's parroting generic shit Kirk said.
>>
File: F4-5bEhXwAA6lE2.jpg (59 KB, 1024x960)
59 KB JPG
The thing about leftist beliefs is that if you take any leftist belief at random and remove the cultural context but keep the reality context you get the most nonsensical and dysfunctional beliefs you could ever come up with
>>
its weird because hes buddies with sandler and the netflix special sandler did was just pure jokes
>>
>>541389401
No because people who hire are biased. Are you being willfully silly or did you just get access to the internet without your handler?
>>
>>541389407
True. People who hire (white middle aged women) are biased. They hire in favour of women and browns
>>
>>541389355
Even if the diversity hires are of equal skill (which they aren't, otherwise this policy would be unnecessary) you're still overtly discriminating on the basis of race.

It's not to say they don't meet some arbitrary threshold for being "qualified", just that they're being held to a lower standard in order to affirm the idea that all groups are equally capable in terms of skill and ability.
>>
>>541389407
>all the Indians and HR white women in corporate circles are boys-club white supremacists

Progressive ideology demands that people pretend social and political dynamics are the same as they were in the 1940s.
>>
>>541389408
>>541389410
So not willfully silly just willfully /pol/, same difference I suppose.
>>
>>541389406
Sandler has the capacity to be funny
>>
>>541389411
Can you describe the average demographics of an HR department real quick anon?
>>
>>541389407
>because people who hire are biased
1. For/Against WHO?
2. Proof?
3. The post you're replying to said "skill & merit-based selection process", which stipulates an absence of any kind of "bias" towards anything (other than skill & merit).
4. Even assuming your claim is correct, your proposed "solution" to the supposed problem of "bias in hiring" is to make biased hiring a POLICY rather than something to avoid? And at the cost of ensuring less-qualified pilots are hired in order to instead meet quotas?
>>
>>541389413
My old copo job was mostly white people, mixed of straight men, women, and fags, a black girl and only indians were in IT. Most anons have never been at a job with an active HR dept.
>>
>>541389411
You cannot reconcile DEI initiatives with notions of equality without insisting that every individual in charge of making an elective decision is biased against minorities. You'd literally have to be retarded to believe this.
>>
>>541389411
oh sorry I forgot the people responsible for hiring in most companies are militant radicalized basement-dwelling genZ hitlerist chuds. All clear now
>>
>>541389407
>No because people who hire are biased
Well yes, DEI and race-quoats will make hiring, and the people conducting it, "biased". That's why it's bad.
Glad you agree. Good to see we're on the same page.
>>
>>541389414
Autism.
>>
>>541389415
I've worked multiple corporate jobs and the HR departments in all of them were entirely women.
>>
>>541389338
lol
>>
>>541389415
I've never met a man in the HR department.
I've met men who are Resourcing consultants and business analysts who design organisations. But no man ends up in the HR department
>>
>>541389415
>Most anons have never been at a job with an active HR dept.
Do you have any actual evidence of this OTHER than them observing & reporting to have observed things that inconvenience your narrative?
>>
>>541389339
>You are not worthwhile as a man unless you get a woman's cunt on you
>Women are worthwhile by default because they have cunts
>>
happy to see this thread has more sober people per capita than most threads these days usually have
>>
>>541389419
>If you require arguments that justify something as drastic as literal institutionalized bias & discrimination based on skin-color and other IdPol shit to at least be logical & consistent, you're "autistic"

Typical. Please understand though, kid: This sort of """argument""" is not going to get you anywhere in real life. If you propose stupid bullshit, people are going to expect you to actually logically justify it. And calling people "autistic" in lieu of having an actual logical justification simply isn't going to cut it. If you don't believe me, you're welcome to try it.
>>
>>541389338
AND HE'S GONNA FIND OUT IT'S HARD TO KEEP GETTING WORK IN HOLLYWOOD WHEN YOU'RE...A CHUD!
>>
>>541389425
the average IQ of this thread might actually be above 100 for once
>>
>>541389404
>parroting generic shit Kirk said
The fact that something is factually true kind of overrides claims that it's "generic". It's like complaining someone is "unoriginal" for saying the sky is, in fact, blue.
>>
>>541389416
There's been plenty of little research things with people sending in two resumes with different names and the black ones never getting picked. Can't help you beyond that, sorry.
>>541389417
I think it's funny Anons act like there aren't people who hate the idea of working with minorities because DEI exists as a concept.

Does everyone here just live in san fran or something?
>>
>>541389430
>There's been plenty of little research things with people sending in two resumes with different names and the white male ones never getting picked.
>>
>>541389429
Anon they're all qualified pilots, the idea that they aren't because <COLOR> is just dumb
>>541389426
Again autism is not understanding that they're already qualified and pretending theyre not because you dont understand well anything is either retarded or autistic I was giving you a nice out.
>>
>>541389431
>A large-scale 2024 study published by economists from UC Berkeley and the University of Chicago sent over 83,000 fake job applications to Fortune 500 companies. They found that employers called back applicants with white-sounding names about 9.5% more often than identical applicants with Black-sounding names.
>A 2024 University of Washington study testing automated resume-screening AI found that the models preferred white-associated names 85% of the time and male-associated names 52% of the time, while overlooking Black male candidates at the highest rates

Cope, idk why you guys fight this so hard, doesnt it mean the white man is winning?
>>
>>541389433
did they provide any data on the qualifications? Did they account that higher class black families might be more likely to give their kids white sounding names and the correlation comes from those kids growing up in better environments and actually sticking to their education? This omits so many causal links it's ridiculous
>>
>>541389433
nigga the only thing this proves is that on average black males have the worst resumes. You need more than that
>>
>>541389344
Don't you dare sully their names by comparing his style of comedy to theirs. This guy still does "Boy, I sure do hate my wife" and "Oh man my mother-in-law is awful" jokes. Hell after he tells one shitty joke he's going through his cards of shit jokes saying "Eeeeh let's see what else we have here." He's not a stand up comedian. He was shit comedy writer who could only come up with "this character is a one joke character and all they do make sure their dialogue comes back to reminding you they're just one joke." He basically has the mind of a 16 year old male and can only write jokes they would find "fucking hilarious" because his character said "You can put your weed in there."
>>
>>541389430
>There's been plenty of little research things with people sending in two resumes with different names and the black ones never getting picked.
What year? Which studies? Can we extrapolate these studies to every single business and institution and the country?
>>
>>541389391
DEI is about making sure you're not picking over someone because they're from a minority group. It's never been about "you must hire this many of this group regardless of their skills."
>>
>>541389434
I don't know anon I literally looked up the green text in the post before and nothing came up saying whitey has it harder. I don't know why Anons fight this it's literally validating that they have a better pathway in corporate settings. Which makes me wonder, did the bitter anons just apply with shit resumes and get rejected then blamed shaniqa and abduls? Sounds like it.
>>
>>541389432
>Anon they're all qualified pilots
This pilpul has already been addressed.
Please see: >>541389397

>the idea that they aren't because <COLOR> is just dumb
Good thing nobody said that.
What's instead being said is that "Pilots hired based on <COLOR> rather than merit are less qualified", which is not just true in practice but true just by definition.
Please attack your opponent's actual argument rather than constructing strawmen arguments.
>>
>>541389439
>I literally looked up the green text in the post before and nothing came up saying whitey has it harder

oh my God you are literally trying to pull the "there's no government data so it doesn't exists" shit. This isn't 2016 lil bro. Draconian information control is a part of your reality now. Account for it.
>>
>>541389440
So are you guys just really fucking stupid? If the pool of candidates are all qualified and you say "We're hiring based off diversity" then you're just hiring qualified pilots based off diversity, skill isn't a factor. God damn even when the evidence supports that they're not hiring COLORZ over whites you still cry like the biggest bitches, you people are insufferable. That would explain why Anons in this thread like Rob tho, birds of an insufferable feather
>>
File: 6f5ra5j6dfr81_jpg.jpg (140 KB, 622x348)
140 KB JPG
>>541389438
>>
>>541389433
Modern resume screening algorithms are demonstrating the opposite biases now. Women and minorities are being given innate preferences.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23794607251320229
>>
>>541389438
>DEI is about making sure you're not picking over someone because they're from a minority group.
It literally isn't. It's about at best """encouraging""", if not outright forcing, the hiring of more "minorities" and fewer Whites, males, etc., regardless of qualifications, via race-quotas and other forms of IdPol-based bias and discrimination.
You're just pretending the goal is "Equality of Opportunity", i.e. the thing you described, as a smokescreen in order to dupe others into supporting it. Too bad the giveaway is outright in the fucking NAME, retard: You know that the "E" in "DEI" doesn't even stand for "Equality", right? It literally stands for "Equity", i.e. "Equality of OUTCOME", i.e. the opposite of "Equality of Opportunity".

You can't gaslight about this shit in 2026, faggot. It's not going to work anymore. People are ALREADY onto you. The jig is ALREADY up. Find a new grift if you have to.
>>
>>541389333
>people skip over his argument
because he isn't making an argument. He is misrepresenting the entire program and pilot training system. It isn't oh you're black and bottom of the class in testing? Ok whatever, here you go, right into flying training.
The reality is it's just more outreach efforts and possible scholarships to get a more diverse group of people. Everyone still has to take all the trains, score high, pass everything. Still only taking the best to the next level.
Idiots just confuse opening a door with letting everyone/anyone go past it. If you got into MIT but could not afford to go, but I step up and pay for you that doesn't somehow make you this lol DEI into MIT! You shouldn't be here etc...
>>
>>541389442
>If the pool of candidates are all qualified
Not only does this not happen, but not all LEVELS of qualification are equal.

>and you say "We're hiring based off diversity"
That's just "we're hiring based on skin-color" with PC-wording. I.e. literal racial-discrimination. And if you support racial-discrimintion you can fuck off, as far as I'm concerned, racist retard.

>So are you guys just really fucking stupid?
Sounds more like you've are. After all, your fat Pork-Rind-munching ass got duped into supporting racial discrimination under a different name, while simultaneously considering yourself an "anti-racist" or some such thing. How stupid do you have to be to fall for that?
What other bullshit did you fall for? That men become "women" if they """identify""" as one? Kek.
>>
>>541389446
>It isn't oh you're black and bottom of the class in testing? Ok whatever, here you go, right into flying training.
That's exactly what it is though. These blacks graduating high school can't even read or write. Then they're fast tracked into being your pilot and doctor based solely off their skin color.
>>
>>541389430
>There's been plenty of little research things with people sending in two resumes with different names and the black ones never getting picked.
The fuck is a "black name", retard? Are we talking about shit like "Jemarquina" and shit like that? You know black people can be; and most frequently ARE; named things like "Dan" and "William" and "Barry", right? How are you supposed to differentiate a black "Barry" from a White one?
It sounds more like there's just a bias against retarded-sounding names. Did they bother to also test for hiring-rates based on resumes with names like "Skeeter" or "Billy Joe-Bob" on them? Becsuse I doubt they failed any better than "Jemarquina" did.
>>
>>541389438
Jason Arday
>>
>>541389449
lmao I fucking bet this is exactly what happened
>>
is it true that if you die by a pilot purposefuly crashing into some mountains or the sea, you're condemned to be his slave in the after world for eternity?
>>
>>541389438
>Here's what DEI really is...
>*lies*
Why do leftists keep thinking they can just get away with doing shit like this? People aren't "stupid". They're not just going to willfully fall for low-effort dishonesty like this in 2026.
>>
>>541389452
no Abdul, the imam lied to you again
>>
>>541389438
It's a distinction without a difference. Companies have "aspirational goals" to have their staff reflect certain racial demographics, and it just becomes a quota under a different name.
>>
>>541389331
He is right but I don’t see the funny. He is just pointing something out
>>
File: evergreen.jpg (64 KB, 1170x484)
64 KB JPG
>>541389453
>>
>>541389446
If there's a diversity quota on recruitment, then there will always be conscious decisions to take the lower performing candidate because of their race/sex

So he might be exaggerating for laughs, but he's still accurate in that they're sacrificing quality for diversity
>>
Starfox was a minority
>>
>>541389331
Rob really will do anything to get work. It's honestly kind of impressive. Quite the distinguished everyman.
>>
File: Tranny Rage.png (63 KB, 796x743)
63 KB PNG
>>541389446
>He is misrepresenting the entire program and pilot training system.

>United Airlines: "We are now prioritizing DIVERSITY in pilot selection (rather than qualification)!"
>Sane people: "United Airlines is prioritizing 'diversity' over qualification. That's fucking insane."
>Retarded leftist incels on the internet: "REEEEEE YOU'RE 'MISINTERPRETING' IT, YOU STUPID CHUUUUUUUUUD!!!!!"
>>
>>541389454
damn it
>>
I think DEI might have a place, but not in recruitment, but in the bit before i.e. Advertising the job and industry

If you had 1 woman employed for every 10 men, and it also turned out you also had 10 women apply for every 100 men, then you might sensibly say "are we missing an untapped resource of skilled women who simply aren't applying"

But like I said, it should end at the hiring interview which should be based on merit and personality
>>
>>541389446
I just don't like niggers, chinks, spics, indians or women being anywhere near the instruments sweaty.
>>
>>541389448
>exactly what it is though
Sigh... Your no college having ass is too under educated yourself to grasp there are degrees and ranges to different programs or efforts to bring in people. You're acting like every effort to boost diversity is a government mandated number. That is the case in some areas but huge chunks of it are only focused on an opportunity.
I'll get you to point A but you have to do everything the same or better then everyone else there to get to point B. That's basically a scholarship or mentor style system. Completely different from a government contract system saying ok we need vendors to make widgets, make sure 15% are blacked owned
You're just to dim witted to see there is a difference. Like you just can't process that there are qualified people of different races. I assume you're shocked white dudes are in the NBA too...
>>
>>541389395
>we're shifting the overton window guys!
>>
>>541389463
the problem is that it's very likely that those ten women are less qualified than the top 10, top 20, and probably even top 30 men that applied for the job. Women and minorities are inherently worse workers as a part of observable results-based reality. Yes, NOT ALL, but 'not all' just means that you will get the occasional unicorn, not that there's untapped genius hiding in the pile of lesser human lifeforms
>>
>>541389463
>I think DEI might have a place
Nope. STILL being too generous. Leftist obsession with race is a mental illness and the antithesis of racial equality. If you want an institution, or a society at large, free of racial discrimination, then DEI has no place there.
Do not give them an inlet. Do not give them an INCH. The time to entertain the idea of "compromise" is long, LONG over.
>>
he converted to Catholicism, that's what every jew should be doing
>>
>>541389469
holy fucking BASED. I'm a Schneiderhead now
>>
>>541389466
Yes. True.

You're one of those people who think simply identifying someone's intentions or actions is some kind of rebuttal, aren't you?
>>
>>541389455
So what you're saying is the people hiring are being lazy and not actually looking for a qualified person to fill that quota.
>>
>>541389338
>>541389427
rated PG13
>>
>>541389461
Because he is... See the problem is you are part of a lower class that never saw recruitment efforts for anything. It's not hurr durr we take anyone. It's hey you seem different from others here, I'm going to help you.
That help moving past early hurdles, like lack of money or lack of access, doesn't change the outcome when people hit merit testing and standards later. Like if I had the power to get you into the NFL combine, you would still flop out.
You are confusing access or help with quotas, because you're kind of stupid.
>>
>>541389465
>Sigh...
Can you go the fuck back to Rebbit already? It's bad enough that you're being blatantly dishonest/confidently wrong. Communicating like a low-IQ high-Estrogen Rebbitor is only making you MORE insufferable than you already are.
>>
>>541389466
...and that's a good thing
>>
>>541389331
It was a pretty good point a decade ago, now it is a pretty bad joke.
>>
>>541389466
We literally are.
Public opinion on "DEI" and shit like that has MASSIVELY shifted in the past 5 years.
>>
>>541389446
>>541389465
>>541389474
>>541389438
Why complain about ending disparate impact standard?
>>
>>541389477
I agree: Leftist beliefs, let alone policies, are a "bad joke".
>>
>>541389331
self hating mixed race white supremacist is my favorite brand of chud lolcow
>>
>>541389481
do you think "lolcow" just means "person I disagree with" you dumb newfag zoomergoy?
>>
>>541389469
aren't all Filipinos catholic? So he embraced his ethnic side? Sounds pretty woke tbqhwyf
>>
>>541389474
>Because he is...
No he isn't. You're just lying about what DEI is and isn't because you want to obfuscate the truth. Because if people don't know the REALITY of how retarded and racist leftist bullshit like "DEI" is, it's easier to dupe them into supporting it, or at least tolerating it.
Pretty simple stuff, honestly. :)
>>
>>541389482
everyone laughs AT him, not with him, he's a lolcow
>>
Why are right-wingers now defending colorblind hiring? Race precedes culture. Race precedes environment. IQ is 100% genetically inherited. All of you should be embarrassed.
>>
File: 1676908345203179.png (739 KB, 1362x715)
739 KB PNG
>>
>>541389332
You are a niggerlover
>>
>>541389481
>[strawman I just made up] is my favorite kind of [ideological strawman]
Ok?
>>
>>541389481
This dude is so desperate for attention he bought bourbon from a distillery that needed to sell off stock since Canada wasn't buying it anymore and he slapped "Liberal Tears" on it to advertise on that Guttfeld show. The guy only knows how to do one thing at a time and he's been doing this "Them liberals amirite?" for like 15 years now.
>>
>>541389468
People like this just want current style white conservative DEI where as long as you suck up to the boss your incompetence doesn’t matter
>>
>>541389489
I saw your mom with a strawman last night? His name? Me.
>>
>>541389490
>he bought bourbon from a distillery that needed to sell off stock since Canada wasn't buying it anymore and he slapped "Liberal Tears" on it
Pretty based, desu. It sure as fuck got you nice & triggered.
>>
>>541389475
>blatantly dishonest/confidently wrong
No, I know more about this stuff then pretty much everyone in this thread. Not only due to my educational back ground but also friends who literally worked in these areas for fortune 50 level corps.
You're all just popping off the classic parrot shit you read on social media while having zero real life education, interaction or knowledge about any of the systems.
I assume most of you are random mid-west basement living dudes with a GED. Being you're not even able to grasp some of the foundational level basics of this topic.
>>
>>541389485
>kiwifags so fucking mindbroken by buzzwords that they don't even know what they mean anymore
>>
>>541389491
>"white conservatives" are responsible for anything bad that humans do
Nah, fuck off, DEI-queer.
>>
>>541389366
You're no better, nigga. Unless you meant to say that you wish for that guy to make, whatever it is you didn't understand, reality.
>>
>>541389494
Actually i'm in delaware
>>
>>541389494
>No, I know more about this stuff then pretty much everyone in this thread.
Apparently not, considering you're posting shit not only in direct contradiction with realtiy but often in direct contradiction with what other proponents of "DEI" say.
You're either massively missinformed and a useful idiot, or a malicious and willful liar running propaganda efforts.
>>
>>541389494
>No, I know more about this stuff then pretty much everyone in this thread.

>"Ummm, acthually DEI is about EQUALITY, chuds..."
>The "E" in "DEI" literally stands for "Equity", the opposite of what "Equality" implies
>>
>>541389484
>You're just lying about what DEI is and isn't
As I have tried to explain to the brick wall that is all you C- students, there are different forms and degrees of what is seen as a DEI system. You can't throw them all in the same bucket.
It's like saying all loans are the same or all payment structures are the same or all knots are the same. Did you tie that down correctly? Sure..... I tied a knot. ok
>>
>>541389336
Went back to watch it again to see if you were right and there is almost an exact equal number of men and women both laughing and not laughing.
>>
>>541389501
>there are different forms and degrees of what is seen as a DEI system
Nobody's even contradicting THAT specific and irrelevant micro-detail, you weasely little pillock. People are fully aware there are different DEGREES of fucking over White people. People are fully aware there are different DEGREES of justifying hiring less-qualified people being hired. The argument is that they're just varying "degrees" of racist & counterproductive shittiness, and that weasels like you that shill for those practices by lying to people about what they are probably deserve to just be lynched at this point.
>>
>>541389501
This is the post where the goalposts are moved.
>You're talking about the BAD DEI! I only support the GOOD DEI
>>
>>541389501
slippery slope was already proven right
>>
>>541389499
Sure... Basically you're a chicken trying to tell the farmer about farming. Despite having no real understanding about farming, just the view of it from being a chicken. Like I don't remotely care that people who haven't even read a book in a decade have to say about complex they clearly don't understand. Being you're just wrong.
It is what it is... If you ever go back to school and get your degree or just start reading more on your own you will figure out in time. Until then, eh... Ya got this Tibetan Yak breeding site I guess
>>
>>541389503
Putting a person in front of a door doesn't mean they can walk through it. The act of helping someone get to a door you don't need help to reach isn't somehow holding you back.
Unless you're trying to say you need less competition to even have a chance. It's a strange take when also claiming how everyone needing help to get to the door is under qualified. I can smell you lifetime of 5th place finishes and all the excuses from a mile away.
>>
File: 1766803290761922.png (8 KB, 348x102)
8 KB PNG
cool
>>
>>541389332
You're not 1% as famous and probably more people think you're cancer
>>
>>541389509
Being famous for being a wank is not a good thing
>>
welcome to /pol/ enjoy your visit
>>
Nigger
>>
>>541389331
Comedy died with George Carlin
>>
>>541389331
Ironic considering that he is a diversity hire himself. Basically maga-safe comedy. Utterly unfunny, just yammering about woke trash.
>>
>>541389331
It's pretty fucking simple. Do you want the best pilot flying you over the fucking ocean, or do you want the correct colored pilot flying you over the fucking ocean? Do you want the best brain surgeon operating on your son or daughter or do you want the correct colored brain surgeon operating on your son or daughter?
>>
>move thread
>it does
>>
>>541389331
Heh
>>
>>541389407
>No because people who hire are biased.
If they are choosing from two qualified candidates that can fly the plane equally skilled then maybe the bias wouldn't matter much. It would be a coin toss otherwise. This isn't the problem though.
>>
>>541389331
Political comedy is unfunny and cringe, regardless of the comedian's politics.
I don't want to hear Marc Maron bitching about Trump either.
>>
>>541389331
jewish guy
>>
Regular words, but a >>541390183
>>
>>541389331
>>541389332
>>541389333
>>541389334
>>541389335
>>541389336
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBym0UZJheQ
>>
>>541389407
Whenever true blind hiring practices are tested (no interview, no demographic info, no name included), and candidates are selected purely on qualifications and aptitude test results, straight white men are overwhelmingly selected.
>>
>>541389385
Sexless males with clipped dicks be like:
>>
>>541389433
And yet when blind candidate selection is done, white males are still favored. This shows that black names aren't being excluded unfairly. Both AI and Human recruiters simply realized through pattern recognition that white male names are a valid heuristic for selecting superior candidates.
>>
>>541389442
So unqualified people should be hired or given a chance to gain experience? A plane has two pilots, one is always going to be extremely experience and weathered compared to the newbie.

You're basically call
>>
its a very complex joke about how old people die and youre a retarded faggot who is clueless about how old pilots exist in the first place.
>>
>>541389368
If you do it on stage and have to deal with bombing in front of a room.

If you do it on a podcast where it's pre-recorded and the reactions are later and online, you can disassociate from the feedback. At first, the podcast format is fun since they have their reps in live, but over the years where they're not building those comedic muscles, they atrophy and start to suck.
>>
File: 1778628207049665.jpg (227 KB, 1179x1174)
227 KB JPG
>>541389339
>>541389424
>>You are not worthwhile as a man unless you get a woman's cunt on you
>>Women are worthwhile by default because they have cunts

you're brave as he'll
>>
>>541389331
I miss the times when "comedy" was about jokes instead of political soapboxing.
It's just Cspan with more theatrics imo



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.