Flock-like cameras are a violation of your Fourth Amendment rights as a US Citizen.ALPRs don't just collect your vehicle information and your license plate they also collect; your gait, your heart rate, your face, BT signals, Wifi signals, RFID signals, Cellular signals, your dogs microchip, your heart monitor, any wearable technology you have, thermal imaging and more.>Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)Ruled that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not just physical spaces. Meaning you have a right to privacy even in a public space if your actions are being conducted in a way that would expect privacy (such as speaking in a phone booth or having a private conversation in your car).>United States v. U.S. District Court, 407 U.S. 297 (1972) Ruled that the Fourth Amendment requires the executive branch to obtain a prior judicial warrant before engaging in electronic surveillance for domestic security purposes.>Chatrie v. United States, 609 U.S. (2026) A RULING FROM THIS YEAR that says law enforcement conducts a Fourth Amendment "search" when it acquires digital location history data via reverse location or geofence warrants, which sweep up location data from every electronic device near a crime scene.>Carpenter v. United States (2018)Ruled that the government acquires a "search" under the Fourth Amendment when it collects historical cell-site location information (CSLI) tracking an individual's movements over a prolonged period.>Kyllo v. United States (2001)Ruled that using advanced sensory technology (like thermal-imaging devices) from a public street to peer into the details of a private home that would otherwise require physical entry constitutes a 4th Amendment search and requires a warrantSCOTUS has repeatedly ruled that mass warrantless wiretapping and surveillance is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and blatantly violates the Fourth Amendment.
Lol! This guy thinks american states are still operating under the constitution!
it's all good goy, we can be trusted for your safety!
