This kills civilisation.What are we even doing but going through the motions at this point?
>>541444005On the bright side, this means future generations will have no problem at all blindly following / worshipping whatever super-advanced AI is eventually given complete control over human political machinations (because the current elites who build it for their own purposes will doubtless lose control over it too)
>>541444005Explains why culture, politics, finances and technological innovations have been in a downward spiral for the last 15 years.
If smart people don't have children because they know it's a crime to trap another soul into a flesh prison, so obviously only room temp hylics make children
>>541444005Not my problem, vaxxiePut your covid mask back on retard
>>541444085The drift between the elites and former middle class only grows year by year. Western governments are basically the enclave from fallout at this point, insulated and disconnected from the people they claim to represent.This is going to lead to nuclear war or some type of AI WMD scenario.
>>541444332But the nuclear war would be quite sad since the people maintaining the nukes are old, retiring and so on.USA can't even replace its retirees who maintained the infrastructure and as more of them retire, more of the infrastructure gets left unkept. So nukes are the least of our problems.
>>541444332>>541444624ayoo just give me a big stick, simple as
>>541444005Theres more than 5 million 130+ iq people in China alone. Most likely 30-40 millionIn the US however, i would estimate 1-1.5 million
>>541445386China's demographic trajectory is a large part of the OP graph. They will lose near a billion people and already have a TFR around 1.0 and as low as 0.5 in coastal cities.
>>541444005Cope. Racemixing is based.
>>541444005Just trust the white devil and their white devil public healthcare.
I guess this explains the Fermi paradox.Any successful planetary civilization eventually gets swamped by retards.
>>541444005It's projecting that when in reality it's just going to drop back to pre-boomer numbers. You can see the graph assumes the trend will continue downwards linearly. It doesn't consider the fact it can and will stop at pre-boomer levels.
>>541444005Well we're heading towards a really bad direction. Techno-dystopia. Why bring someone into that world? Even if they inherit a high IQ, environmentally, the wealthy will still have access to the best resources, and regardless, even if they can't utilize those resources to become valuable in some way, they'll still end up in the best positions in society while your kid is stuck doing something soul crushing and back-breaking. Why bring someone into the world that's most likely going to suffer in ways you couldn't possibly imagine? I'm not optimistic about the future and I have good reason not to be.
>>541444005not my problem. everything that has been achieved will be maintained for a long time and future mutts deserve a regressive future anyway
>>541444005>t. born 1984 w/ 136Seems legit. My own kids do some pretty dumb shit that I would have never done as a kid. They can barely work a remote control on a GUI interface while I was booting up games in DOS at their age
>>541449559Return to the mean
>>541448760>it can and will stop at pre-boomer levels.and this will happen for what reason, exactly?
>>541444005Couldn't find this graph in either the UN report nor the parra & Kirkegaard paper. Please help my smooth brain find this and also, this is clearly a population decline assesment, not actual intellectual brainrot unless the UN report predicts the jewish plot of subversion through migration means actually succeeds in taking down the IQ to room temparature
>>541444005uhh, that shows that there are more of them today than when civilization was advancing the most and that the peak was at the worst civilizational downfall
