We’re entering another dark age
>>541533202the great anti-intellectual society is failing? how could this happen? /s
who exactly is testing IQ?
>>541533202But Jeff Bezos assured us that if we just 10x the human population the number of geniuses would increase linearly. How could this possibly be.
>>541533342Psychiatrics, Tests like Hawks2.I had 116 with being 10 years old.85-115 is average while 100 is median
were the outliers
>>541533514were they what
>>541533514Where the outliers
>>541533202>just project 70 years into the future bro
civilization exists mainly for two things, the spic-nig cycle(or jeet-nig cycle depending where you live) and the pedophile dark triad psychopathic classthat's it, that's why newton invented calculus, why haber invented the process to chemically make fertilizers, it reduces down to his, feeding an infinite number of jeets and niggers and plastering them everywhere so that epsteins can engorge themselves for 50 years longer
>>541533202>population declining in smartest regions>population exploding in the lowest IQ regionsIdiocracy predicted this.
>>541533202The sad thing is i won't even get the last laugh and point at the retarded shitlibs for being stupid, as they are so stupid they won't even understand it.I don't really know how to best describe it, but It's like warning a retard not to jump into the tiger's enclosure, but never getting the satisfaction from seeing him realizing what he's done.
>>541533202So there are so few of us
>>541533504I just don't believe you. Also, judging by online iq tests, they seem to score 100 iq people at like 140 or something. They are making average people feel like geniuses, as if it's some cia psyop to empower people who are average or stupid.
>>541534047You are correct that iq tests, on the individual level, might not be too accurate especially if one is allowed to practice, i scored on some online tests above 130 of which i'd like to flatter myself, but we both know that's simply so statistically unlikely that it's just because i'm more familiar with them.Now on larger scales, with a larger amount of fairly random people who aren't interested in this sort of stuff it becomes more accurate. If sample size is your problem i'd be more than happy to see larger studies, the problem is that we all know what the results would be so they aren't allowed to be done.
>>541534047>muh online testsIF YOU PRACTICE FOR THE FUCKING TEST SO YOU CAN LARP AS A GENIUS, YOU'RE GOING TO ACHIEVE 130 JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER IMBECILE DOING THE SAME SHIT.
>>541534047>I just don't believe you. Also, judging by online iq tests, they seem to score 100 iq people at like 140 or something.Agree. I tested 131-133 with the online tests, and I don't think I'm that smart.I have a BS in scientific studies, but I failed miserably with calculus. Trig was the last level of mathematics i was competent with. I'm still a good problem solver for everything else though.
>>541533202I feel bad for the "smart" ones in 50 years. I feel like im surrounded by idiots now, couldn't imagine the stupid wave in the future.
