[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (1012 KB, 1312x1171)
1012 KB PNG
>https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/08/26/federal-judge-warns-law-is-being-left-behind-by-ai-sex-abuse-images/

> archived link bypass signing in.

They were convinced it does not involve real kids making it technically legal.
>>
>>541579311
https://archive.is/jLhWz

here's the archive link of the article
>>
>>541579311
we should really remove the bill of rights next time democrats wins the presidency and put every migger in prison.
>>
>>541579311
this ruling doesnt say what you think it does
>>
>>541579311
I mean it’s gross but it’s just a fake image generated by a program
>>
File: IMG_7460.jpg (115 KB, 1024x1024)
115 KB JPG
>>541579482
I wholeheartedly agree, although prison is too lenient. They should be castrated, de-tongued, and sentenced to hard labor until they die so they can repay their debt to society.
>>
>>541579311
Yeah.
The SCOTUS said that just MAKING the image has to involve an actual crime, else it's free speech.
So, snuff videos are bad. but games where you kill people are okay.
the States, like Florida and Texas, immediately went for the "obscene" loophole, where obscene is ill defined and a "I know it when I see it" standard.
>>
File: IMG_8988.jpg (410 KB, 1620x2025)
410 KB JPG
>>541579311
>>
>>541579562
very informative, anon. /pol/ thanks you for your worthy shit posts.
>>
Good.
>>
File: IMG_8972.jpg (72 KB, 1041x694)
72 KB JPG
>>541579652
The fact that millions of women are defending “this” totally changes everything. Morality is not a one-way street.
>>
File: 1784340136068948.jpg (179 KB, 1200x834)
179 KB JPG
>>
How is this a hot take? CP is not banned because of morality, its banned because its child abuse.
If you remove the child abuse then what reason is it left for it to be illegal?
>>
>>541579482
>>541579652
>your brain on socialism
>>
>>541579764
Now this is real information.
this annon is correct, >>541579562 the headline a deception
But your posts explains why.
>>
>>541579311

>liberals sigh in relief knowing that their hard drives won't be subpoena'd in the near future
>>
>>541579913
>giant pussy scared of buzzwords
>>
>>541579843
women have no concept of morality. Which is why until 200 years ago the Church kept women out.
>>
>>541579893
who was abused if it's AI and no children were involved?
That's the courts ruling. Now, play stupid that you can't understand that
>>
>>541579311
The purpose of cp being illegal is to protect children from being used in porn production. Banning AI porn doesn't make sense, since no people are involved in the production at all.
>>
File: IMG_8989.png (432 KB, 415x739)
432 KB PNG
>>541580042
Agreed, but we have an intolerable situation now where creatures with no moral compass or capacity for self reflection (much less a sense of personal responsibility) are demanding the most draconian laws be passed against men yet scream they be absolved themselves of any responsibility. I would love for somebody to explain to me how long a civilization can last under that cognitive dissonance.
>>
>>541579311
>No Child Involved.
>No Actual Harm Done.

What is the problem here? Honestly, the people who are bothered by this shit should move back to UK/Australia where they can properly rape white children because that is what banning freedom of expression does and has always done based on real statistics.

>Less Freedom of Expression
>2000%-4000% Increase in REAL Child Rape.
>Lower IQs.
>>
>>541580107
>>541580250
Well....
>>
>>541580299
"Child Porn" by what definition? In UK/Other places that is just cartoons.

You are gullible as fuck to the leftists language games.
>>
>>541580202
No victim, no crime.
>>
>>541580107
bro we are basically agreeing with each other here, wtf are you reading on my post
>>
>>541580299
Grok won't even generate a nipple or a swimsuit.
>>
>>541580299
Everything about a crime is tainted.
Child porn is illegal. Products of Child porn are thus illegal.
Same principle as if a person is murdered and then his flesh sold for consumption. Murder is the crime and you can't profit from the crime.
Are you claiming that ALL AI is trained on illegal images? IF you can prove that, then you have a case.
>>
>>541580355
I'm just saying it's possible they did use real CP. Dumbass. Get the culture war out of your ears.
>>
>>541580299
And now, thanks to aggressive moderation, you can't even make a character more "young looking" even if they are well above 18.
>>
>>541579482
>>541579652
You won't do shit, you impotent nigger worshipers
>>
Karens seething
>>
>>541580453
Then what's this
>>>/gif/31097619
>>
>>541580521
I mean, everything is possible, but does it need it to do it?

The truth is.
> No, it doesn't. AI is fucking scary now.

Also, if that is the case, that isn't just "Grok" that is all AI because literally anyone sharing their pics in a PM somewhere (even discord) probably went to an AI somewhere, but when you mix/match billions of images it no longer looks like any single person.
>>
>>541580531
Kys pedo
>>
weights are trained on datasets for image diffusion and generation. CSAM may be in the mix since companies harvest images indiscriminately with AI tagging them, but there are also safeguards to prevent generated CSAM from happening. Sickos will jailbreak or remove weights that prevent the image from generating, but the references come from real people, real kids. Its a gray line, but they should be shot regardless for not abstaining.
>>
>>541580277
>I would love for somebody to explain to me how long a civilization can last under that cognitive dissonance.
Clearly, it's done because civilization can't survive.

The Church teaches exercises in doing without (abstinence and fasting on Friday), in introspection (confession) and moral purity (avoid jews like they're demons).
They don't do that anymore. The Jesuits murdered all the practices that taught character and made for a better world.
>>
>>541580656
"I like younger looking woman well above 18."
>PEDO!!!!111

Foid Detected, Opinion Disregarded.
>>
File: EatZeBugs.png (100 KB, 1000x600)
100 KB PNG
>>541579311
Its a tool for pedophiles to commit illegal acts on our Children of society.
it's full throttle retarded.
Remember before Trump Fuck Kids it was actually Clinton having 12-14 year olds at cocaine parties (admitted by his own security team which were Arkansas deputy sheriffs on tax payers dole). Trump may have fucked a 17 year old or may not have.
Remember the far left wanted to legalize children having sex. I mean how fucking sick is this?

so how can you even justify this act?
Remember that if you utilize AI its a service rendered over internet.
But you can't buy marijuana paraphernalia right? they arrested Tommy Chong for that one. there are a lot of comparable that makes this fucking senseless as shit
>>
>>541580521
>possible, ergo all.
Non sequitur
>>
File: 1761143626583713.png (715 KB, 676x680)
715 KB PNG
>>541580299
US really is pedo central
>>
>>541580652
>does it need it
If they did then it doesn't matter whether it needed to. The whole thing would be tainted. Which knowing big tech and their amorality, I'd bet dollars to donuts it did use real CP and CSA images and videos
>>
>>541580820
Change flag back to to leaf/UK/Australia now.
>>
>>541580037
thanks, but you're indian so...happy shitting!
>>
>>541580741
Lrn2read
>>
File: 1775011528796746m.jpg (93 KB, 1024x977)
93 KB JPG
>>541580863
Stop defending pedophiles
>>
>>541580836
You don't understand how AI works and it shows.


Go back to being an angry foid, or read a rape book or whatever woman do these days.
>>
>>541580711
Go fuck your hand to cartoon children you dysgenic cunt
>>
File: 1674577909841948.png (232 KB, 467x408)
232 KB PNG
Artificial Intelligence is not human. The word "artificial" is right in the name. So, it is not CP, because there is no child involved. Children are humans, not drawings made by a person or a computer.
>>
>>541580960
Oh shut up
>>
>>541580616
much of it was made before the crackdown.
some folks provide an image, some folks find exploits

That particular image isn't even R-rated. The rule was breast and ass okay, no full frontal nudity, e.g. same standard R-rated is (because of Banking requirements, oddly; any stronger than R gets a lot of credit card fraud). No children (because SpacexAI doesn't want to litigate and or be boycotted), no images of celebrities or real people (because of civil laws)
>>
>>541580107
The problem is that AI can only regurgitate what its training data put in. So what training data is it leaning on to make CP? Depending on how that shakes out, the court might have just ruled that sufficiently transformative CP is no longer CP.
>>
>>541580820
>>541580925
Nice projection, you pedophile. Only a pedophile would project this hard. You sick fuck.
>>
>>541580616
I spent all of my available grok points trying to get grok to do nudity. It's worthless. You can't even jailbreak it.
>>
File: source.gif (1.46 MB, 800x800)
1.46 MB GIF
>>541580925
>Defending Freedom of Expression, even the ones you don't agree with is the most important thing to a society.

AI and Cartoons are not real. Your barbarian mind will only harm and exploit real children, which is all that happens when you go after thought crime.

You are the reason real child rape goes up, because the focus is on fake shit, if anything you are the real pdf here because everything you do and are doing statistically benefits them.

>And this is why woman should not vote, all emotion, no logic.
>>
>>541580874
You can't even write and pretending you have a point isn't a point, it's a jew level shtick.

If Grok was trained on actual child porn per the SCOTUS, then that's would be illegal, as I said. Not every AI model or LORA is trained on child porn.
>>
>>541581060
Regular legal porn, and then legal images of children.
>>
>>541581060
Most porn models these days have hairless genitals. The porn video obviously shows them having sexual intercourse. So you have that mechanic and then you combine it with the other body parts and you can assemble any type of activity you want synthetically speaking. It’s just like how it’s possible to prompt a fire breathing goose that has bat wings. That doesn’t exist in nature, but the AI will construct it per the instructions.
>>
>>541581301
This.
People don't know what AI can or cannot do.
>>
>>541579311
Its not about catching or exposing "le evil pedos!"
Its about protecting their culture of ritualistic child rape and child butchering/Harvest

Its like saying Nigger in front of a Nigger
Its protecting dey cultcha you goyim
>>
>>541579913
you dont have a brain migger
>>
I'm sure aliens, little green big boobed gremlin girls, and fire breathing dragons exist because I've seen AI images of those and they HAD to train the models on the real thing, right?
>>
>>541581396
why so antisemetic bro?
>>
>>541579709
Obscenity law of I know it when I see it and Dem fighting words law, sound like tools for tyranny since its deeply subjective. I was just looking at anime girl grip tape for skateboards because it looked like pretty good memes.
>>
>>541580925
You either have free speech and privacy or you have Palantir and Flock. Take your pick.
>>
>>541580441
Please keep in mind that anywhere between 1/3-1/2 of the american posters on this website are functionally illiterate border hoppers. Most of the rest are bots.
>>
>>541580441
Ah. You use the correct SCOTUS definition of CP. My bad. The other side calls CSAI "CP"
My bad. I'm retarded
>>
File: images (3).jpg (32 KB, 399x501)
32 KB JPG
>>541581791
We only read the first part, you have to be direct the first sentence. You can't seem disagreeable then actually agree, that is confusing rhetoric to those freedom fighters constantly defending freedom against foids.

>People even got the AI Chatbot Companion taken down.
>>
>>541579311
They should just ban the production/possession of realistic appearing depictions of child abuse.
Morality is 100% subjective anyway. If a majority doesn't want to allow this then just ban it. Simple as.
>>
>>541581618
The political landscape is some judge saying you cant say nigger without being in fear for your life so the possibility some guy getting picked up and butt fucked in jail over Ahegao and Anime waifu memes seems very real. So if that 100TB of hyper realistic AI generated CSAM is the slippery slope then so be it, imo.
>>
>>541579795
i'm not trying to vaguepost, it's just that OP is an irredeemable faggot
>>
>>541579893
> CP is not banned because of morality
But it should be. Morality is self-defence against the monster in us. It's sleeping in every individual, in particular in the 'good' people.
>>
>>541582088
> The Loli Stays.

Loli is the new slippery slope, ban Loli, lose freedom. That is how it always is.

>>541582284
Fictional CP isn't CP.
>>
>>541579311
>NOOOOO THINK ABOUT AI CHILDREN!!!
Into mental asylum you go.
>>
>>541582284
President Trump is a pedophile thats why this was ruled to be legal.
>>
>>541580711
>Opinion Disregarded.
it's "opinion rejected"
it's a rhyme you dummy
>>
>>541581010
> it is not CP, because there is no child involved
Even artful renderings can be pornography.
Pornography needs not be realistic, needs not depict any real being.

It's a different question if a child suffered abuse and if real abuse is a requirement to justify a ban of pornography depicting children.
>>
>>541582700
>pornography
thats just a fake word that chuds made up to pretend something bad!
>>
>>541582337
> Fictional CP isn't CP.
Pornography does not need to appear realistic at all.
>>
>>541580299
Who is the plantiff of the lawsuit- I didn’t know that you could sue someone for zero personal or group damages. See this is why I say the US courts are third world. These types of suits are brazenly not legal.
>>
>>541582700
>Even artful renderings can be pornography.
Oh yeah, let's burn all classical paintings
>>
>>541582769
It's certainly not healthy to only consume pornographic media instead of experiencing real sexuality.
>>
>>541582925
> can be
>>
>>541582284
you're a German, you have no concept of freedom of speech or freedom in general
>>
>>541580996
>Cartoon 20 something year old children!
Chads are finally now all starting to side with incels thanks to lindsey, so it’s GG for feminism soon.
>>
>>541582832
>Ignored my point, moving to another.

And what harm does "Pornography in general"?

It has existed for thousands of years, and will thousands of years after this. You are are delusional as you are retarded.
>>
>>541579311
yeah i am curious where this goes, the court ruled in favor of the movie american beauty, ie 'simulated' cp was deemed free speech.
>>
>>541582284
>>541583040
*I mean for fictional content, I didn't read the green text, but you know what I mean, fiction is speech
>>
>>541583027
>everything I don't like is pedo porno!
>everything I like get the pass, even if it looks the same as pedo porno!
>>
>>541581618
How come “fighting words” laws allow niggers and women to murder anyone who slights them, but it does NOT allow victims of bullies to fight back physically when they are insulted and attacked? It’s weird how it only exists for certain classes
>>
>>541579482
>>541579652
Crucify them along from Trump Tower to Mar-A-Lago along I95. Then send the man himself on a tar & feathered tour through the most blood-red pockets of the nation.
>>
>>541582069
Like Holocaust denial.
Deny the holo, german bro. I dare you.
There has to be limits on the government banning thoughts and speech. You germans went full retard.
>>
>>541583286
>"The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects artistic expression as a fundamental form of free speech."

>Includes things you find offensive, which is why it should be most protected, as it causes no actual harm.

If you don't like the Constitution, start a Civil War and win, lefty.
>>
File: 1741315181112947.gif (720 KB, 379x400)
720 KB GIF
>>541583426
>>
>>541579764
So they only dismissed his possession charge? Not distribution (obviously) or production?
>>
>>541583538
To add to this. Every solution and thing you proposed statistically only increases real child rape and SA and harms more children in the end. Which is why you will remain an uncivilized foid who can't think logically.

Sorry, killing your kids is worse than fictional cp.
>>
>>541583744
are you AI?
>>
>>541583279
"Fighting words" is basically a dead branch of unprotected speech, but it gets hauled out by corrupt lower courts when they want to make a political statement that the evidence doesn't fit. The Supreme Court hasn't upheld a "fighting words" conviction in ~80 years (as Justice Barrett noted in her dissent in Counterman v. Colorado), but it also hasn't been explicitly eliminated or ruled unconstitutional by SCOTUS, either.
>>
>>541583812
No.

Just intelligent, unlike you. Sorry I don't need chatgpt to have pattern recognition and common sense or look up statistics.
>>
File: 1722770659863361.jpg (203 KB, 1024x1024)
203 KB JPG
>>541579311
what the fak am i reading.
>>
>>541583680
They are leaning towards the public square versus private space interpretation of the First amendment which is the only rational way to resolve this. Basically you can do anything you want, First amendment wise, in your private space, but if you put it out in the public square then that’s where they can crack down on you. So dissemination and publication would be included in this. Otherwise, if you took out a piece of paper in your house and wrote “the president is a fink” and that was against the law then they would have to kick down everyone’s door.
>>
>>541579311
Lmao the pedo right wing AI bros win another one. Epstein people all of them.
>>
>>541579893
Not arguing the point, but your attempt to distinguish morality from abuse. Everything is morality. Our views towards abuse is morality. All laws are based on a moral argument.
>>
>>541581417
edgy. does your mom know you post here?
>>
I'm fine with this, even though I think AIslop is absolute worthless trash, because at the end of the day this is just trying to regulate free expression.
Let the Europoors bear the grunt of speech control so they can all be arrested for not having a LOICENSE to draw that cartoon girl too young, they're all Muslims anyways, so they consider drawings haram and would rather real life little girls be raped instead.
>>
>>541579764
>Ruling affirmed that AI images aren't CSAM
>Continue to spend the whole article calling it CSAM
I fucking hate retards, so, so, so, so much.
>>
kek. that's the right ruling. marking drawings illegal is barbarism. The kind of mob rule via disgust that got people burned and impaled by the law. Only someone with a child's mind thinks fucking drawings should be illegal
>>
>>541583826
Awesome post king. Thanks. Saved.
>>
File: Z(2).jpg (119 KB, 500x763)
119 KB JPG
>>541580277
>>
File: 1486090489102.jpg (29 KB, 600x491)
29 KB JPG
>>541580299
>lawsuit says



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.