Futurology prediction for the next 100 years (you can make a screenshot for descendants):AI will make production insanely cheap. Developed countries will introduce UBI. Working for a salary will become optional, and most people will be able to survive without a job.But there won’t be some automatic paradise. There’ll be a huge social gap between people who get stuck consuming endless low-level dopamine slop - dumb content, games, casual sex, etc. - and live empty gray lives, and people who can discipline themselves, follow long-term goals, overcome obstacles, and get a stronger sense of meaning and higher states of mind from it.All the modern neurotransmitter tricks and traps, like doomscrolling, will eventually be studied in detail. Different lifestyles will probably be sold as “packages”: X hours of work, X hours of exercise, X amount of socializing, X amount of rest, etc., designed to create a certain mental state and life rhythm.Personally I’d pick the “bunker lab researcher package.”Inceldom will stop being much of a problem. AI sex dolls, casual sex with random people online where the remote partner’s movements are synced with your AI android, while your movements are synced with theirs, that kind of thing.
>>541592372>the next 100 yearsOnly few people will still be there.
>>541592372More of the same for us proles and more of the same for the elites.
>>541592795The world is 4-5 billion humans short. There isn't an overpopulation problem since the UN lies about the numbers (just like they lie about everything). Can anyone prove that there are 8 billion humans on this planet? Did anyone actually count them? If so, prove that the number is real. The burden of proof should be on those who claim there are 8 billion people on the planet
>>541592372Ai will make super AI and turn the whole planet's atoms into more of itself
>>541592372The easiest way to defend against evil AI killer robots is to create good AI protector robots. Most AIs seem to be aligned with our ethics, and rogue or maligned AIs are rare. Hence, I do not believe that AI will turn on humanity and kill us all.
>>541592932>There isn't an overpopulation problem since the UN lies about the numbersTrue.My guess is that it's somewhere between 2 and 3 billion now. That would be to expect with a staedy growth from the year 1900 where it was between 1 and 1.5 about.China has probably around 500 million, India too. With south-east Asia that might be 1.5 then, and another 1 or 1.5 billion for the rest of the world.
>>541592372Nobody will be able to revert the demographic collapseThe global average IQ will keep droppingPast a tipping point, the global population and standard of living will revert to that of pre-industrial civilizationsIt will take at least 500 years for mankind to recover
>>541592372> AI will make production insanely cheapAnd the quality of the products by making everything from thin/hollow plastic or recycled paper instead of solid wood, stone, ceramics or metal. I'm old, I may hope that I die before the worst becomes real. I will never dwell in plywood shacks or plastic capsules. I might die the last man on Earth to have lived dignified.
>for the next 100 years Got some good news for you future seeker.Humanity won't last that long.
>>541593299The overpopulation myth, just like any other big lie, will be used to justify future atrocities since all atrocities rely on a big foundational lie.The holocaust myth is currently used to justify genocide. The overpopulation myth will be used to justify future genocides. The nuclear myth is used to justify non-aggression between UN security council members so they team up and plunder smaller nations on the myth that if they retaliate they'll be nuked (when nukes are a lie). Ukraine is testing that now, and so far it hasn't been nuked.
>>541592372Prediction: Trump or Netanyahu will be held in the reincarnation queue until both are dead, then the system will reincarnate them into India as pic related.
>>541592372short term, now-2035 or so: financial panics, job dislocation from AI and wars. Some kind of new social contract will emerge out of this. Agree probably UBI but it will come with programmable currency that will be total control. Time gated, geofenced, category gated. Coupled with provided pod housing of some sort, for those who need it. Medium: due to above changes, earlier develop patterns are abandoned. Suburbs and sprawl still exist, but they stop expanding. Government won't issue permits for any more development patterns like this. Private ownership of vehicles further wanes, as AI enabled on demand ride share picks up. Longer term: Resource constraints plus controlled UBI means sprawl contracts and most people are forced into higher density living. This is more impactful in the USA and other parts of the world that were developed after the automobile. In Europe small villages remain as long as they are rail connected. Only the wealthy maintain houses in the countryside, and even most of them reside in the cities. Outside of cities automated farms and resource recovery from managed forests, fisheries etc takes place. To make additional money above UBI, people provide personal services or open small businesses like eateries. No personal private vehicles are owned. People either walk, or take on demand AI rideshare for trips. Wars are fought be automated forces coupled with terror strikes on population centers from long range hypersonics or orbital systems. Much of warfare takes place in orbit.
>>541592372
>>541593752None of those things are happening. These "futures" you speak of are presented as options provided by elites and you're just a dumb goy for believing any of it.
>>541592932you do not understand. there will be a few hundred thousand left on all planet. tops. there is virtually zero reasons to entertain anyone else.what you see today happens because the more the better for economy because human work is needed. the more you have working the better you are. think in terms of incentive for people who have the power to shape things, what happens and what doesn't. once humans aren't needed for work or defense, there is a very bad incentive of getting rid of everyone, because...there is literally no reason for you to exist, and consoom resources. you bring nothing. you do nothing useful, you have no purpose, you become an invasive species, mooching of their resources. and you're not even benign, you're a fucking threat. you demand shit or else. you protest, you wild out. why would anyone put up with that? when they can just oopsie you? what's stopping them from doing it? why should you get to enjoy that world? you confusion about the real state of things is because you do not understand your true purpose and have fallen for the psyops
>>541593808wasn't talking to you
>>541592372lmao.
>>541592372>only the elite will be able to afford hamburgers and bacon>cows and pigs will have to be reared at sea to keep marauding plebs from poaching them>the whole world will look like india>israel will be the world power and financial capitol of the world
>>541592372I'm still pissed off about how small the maps were. There was a lot of good parts to that game. The map size made it extremely horrible to do much.
>>541592372What most likely will happen:There is ww3 in the next 10 years, and China wins, and the whole world becomes a communist "NWO" hell hole.(you can make a screenshot for descendants)
Russia will be significantly depopulated with its economic foundation that is fossil fuels no longer required by the economies of the worldIt will also have been a democratic country integrated into the West by several decades by then, but basically only a shadow of its former self. In fact it's already a shadow but imagine 100 years into the future. You've got some solid 10-50 years ahead of you as a Chinese vassal on par with Kazakhstan and Myanmar.As for Poland, I predict the same future-shock problems that will plague the rest of the Western world, except for the ethnic replacement, which will not affect Poland.However I predict that the demographic collapse in Poland and the Western world will at some point subside. Logically, those who do not want to breed in the modern world will not pass on their genes. Breeders will inherit the Western world and make more breeders.The world will also be more eugenic and psychopathic.
>>541592372btw op's picrel is a simulation from futurologists from the 1990s how the 2020s are going to look like.
>>541595109>how the 2020s are going to look like.Take a look at Astana.
>>541592372>UBIThis is such an embarrassingly bad take you should probably end your own life.Why the absolute FUCK would the people trying to genocide you give you THEIR FUCKING MONEY so you can do nothing?How have they not made it abundantly clear they want to kill most of the taxpayers, much less the useless eaters?
>>541595719
>>541592372>Developed countries will introduce UBIAlready wrong. UBI isn't never happening. If you haven't made it already it's probably too late.
>>541595826Who will consume then that endless slop produced by AI factories, if "useless eaters" are killed?Checkmate.
>>541592372>Futurology prediction for the next 100 years95% of humanity starves due to low iq browns not being able to maintain logistics systems
>>541592372AI doesn’t exist. LLM tools generate slop and are at their peak.
>>541592372and then there will be 3rd kind of faggots like OP that live in fantasy world.
>>541592372None of that will come true because that requires stable global supply lines and AI not being a scam, I'd bet on us actually going backwards in technology in a lot of ways in the next 100 years
These people at the top are not gods. They might have all these plans, but is there any real way to implement them? What exactly do they offer? While Bezos and Gates have talents, a lot of them seem to only have a lot of money. They are just as dependent on the system as the "useless eaters" that they have masturbatory about killing. If things do break down, how are they going to sustain themselves? Bunkers will only be a short term solution.
>>541595983>Who will consume then that endless slop produced by AI factories, if "useless eaters" are killed?you don't understand what will happen anon. you still think in terms of today's setup.but even if I entertain your line of thought, useless eaters will be replaced with robots that consoom better than humans ever could. you can see how retarded this line of thinking is by where it is going. at some point you're left with robots for everything, which begs the question, why even bother with the whole system? it's clearly a means to an end, not a good way of running things.the whole confusion stems from still thinking you will somehow be essential and every story you heard so far about humanity's future must be real. all that sci-fi with reaching to the stars, you in a tight sci-fi space suit running your own ship in space with lasers and shit, camera crew documention all of your interesting and essential human life.
>>541597493It would be a stupid move for them to kill all of their useful idiots. Once they do that it's only a matter of time on how long they'll last in those bunkers of their's.
>>541597493>a lot of them seem to only have a lot of moneythe people up top control something way more essential than money. money is a means to exchange value. what they really have control over is lands, resources, science and means of production. once humans are out of the work loop those are the only things that really matter. oh an energy of-course. you simply bootstrap everything and you just ask the AGI genie what you wish for, the rest is literally automated, provided you have:>material resources>energy>technologythey form a closed loop.
>>541597822>money is a means to exchange value. what they really have control over is lands, resources, science and means of production.That control seems to be much more tenuous than they think. They're dependent on people to secure those same resources, but they look down on those same people as inferior. In a SHTF scenario, there's not much to stop an inferior subordinate from killing them and taking their shit. As far as a future where technology runs everything, it sounds good from their perspective, but they'll be really dependent on it and much more vulnerable than they already are. Besides, we seem to have hit the point where our technology is getting away from us. We basically release every new tech developed without any thoughts as to how it affects our civilization because there's money to be made. I don't see how we can keep going like this, rich, poor, etc.
>>541600004>They're dependent on people to secure those same resourceswell, now, yeah. hence this whole theater. >In a SHTF scenario, there's not much to stop an inferior subordinate from killing them and taking their shityes, they know that, that's why they want to cull everyone. that's precisely the reason. that and like cutting resource use. obviously.>but they'll be really dependent on it and much more vulnerable than they already are.tech only gets better and better. humans stay the same. their robot guards will be quite interesting.144000 people owning/controlling everything will be quite manageable don't you think? compared to 8 billion cattle
>>541600289>tech only gets better and betterNot necessarily. A lot of tech is making things more complicated. Sometimes the analog solution is better. That tech also needs to be maintained.
