What does /pol/ think of Winston Churchill? A hero who helped saved Western democracy when it was at its most vulnerable, or a drunken attack dog of Organized Jewry who ultimately hastened the collapse of the British empire? Opinions on him seem pretty divided within the dissident right.
Based heroBetween France falling in June 1940 and Soviet Russia getting backstabbed by their Nazi German ally in June 1941, Britain was alone against the whole of Europe succumbed to the evil and was alone the light of civilization at that point with America acting gay and retarded
he solved the german question
The latter. It's unfortunate that Hitler had to contend with the likes of him and Stalin. If the other powers had just had slightly less determined/ruthless heads of state, the world would've been very different (better).
>>541624904I hate your existence Polish why didn't any of them just kill you. What a mistake.
>>541624803GERMONEY WAS CHALLENGING THE BRITISH EMPIRE SO THEY HAD TO DUKE IT OUT
Germannies couldn’t beat a small Island xD
>>541624803He literally destroyed Western Civilization.
>>541625006just don't cry yourself to sleep, ok?
the goyest of goyim who ever goyed, anglo pyrrhus on steroids
>>541624803Loser who sold out his country to the jews all because he feared Germans.
hegelian hero
>>541625279this. world spirit
>>541624803Zionist and Freemason.
>>541625274THE ANGLO SAXON ISNT LETTING THE G*RM TAKE OVER EVROPA NOT WITHOUT A FIGHT
also he sent so many australians to the grave over half a century>boer wars>gallipolli>told them to fuck off when they got attacked by japan>malaya
>>541624803One of the worst leaders in history and there have been a lot of those also he didn't even believe in democracy himself and said the best argument against democracy is a ten minute conversation with the average voter, one of the few relatively smart things he said
sacrificed his empire so that the ussr could take over eastern europe awardluckily america picked up the slack and btfo them
>>541624803> Opinions on him seem pretty divided within the dissident right.Not really. Are they? Anybody that knows their history knows what Churchill really was. A putrid man willing to do literally anything to fulfill his delusions of grandeur and pay for his vices. After WWI he fell in disgrace, and was bought by (((Focus group))) to be their public-facing stooge. He was drunk literally all the time, most of "his" public speeches, including the famous "we will fight them on the beaches", had to be read by a speaker as he was too drunk to be able to read coherently.On a tight leash, he executed his handlers' orders with seemingly nonexistent shame or moral doubt. He extensively wrote in his own diaries about the things they made him do and the lies he was very well aware he was telling to the public. He was candid about Hitler's peace offers and how the blame for continuing the war laid on England's side, as well as the act of terrorism England kept repeating by bombing civilians in Germany to instigate a german reaction. He talked about those the same way you'd talk about your shopping list - just "work", something he does so that he can keep fucking prostitutes and drinking himself to death.Some say he had a pact with his handlers where he were to die without seeing the plan their handlers had for the UK accomplished - the ultimate boomer, in a way. Willing to sell his country to jewry but unwilling to face or even see the consequences of that. Rarely you can find a figure so all-around disgusting in history as Churchill was, so not sure why you say that opinions on him are divided. Anybody I know that knows history knows about how much of a maggot Churchill was. The pinnacle of realpolitik, a callous hired gun that cared for nothing else but power. Only Andreotti comes close.Then of course you have the (((dissident right))) and those probably praise Churchill like they praise Roosevelt, but that's just liars and grifters put there to defuse actual dissent
>>541624803He fulfilled the promise of the British Empire: to serve Jews until the end. Seeing anyone praise Churchill or the Empire post ~1850 makes me sick. Oh, our country was the premier attack dog of the Jews, am I supposed to he proud of that?
>>541625387Doing god's work.
>>541624803shabbos goy who facilitated the collapse of our countries
>>541624803I want to say he was a good wartime leader, a good motivational speaker. He said he'd let Gandhi die on hunger strike, I suppose that was pretty based. But the harsh reality is he played his part in Britains decline. Many people have, over a long period of time at this point. But it has to be said, he contributed fairly significantly to it
>>541626498Why would you ever want to say anything good about Churchill?
>>541626608Because I'm English, through and through. Before the country turned to shit, it was drummed into us all Churchill was magnificent, and was harshly treated politically after the war.Now we've arrived at a point where its illegal to be English, and its also cool to call Churchill for what he was.
>>541626745So you still haven't shed all the pro Churchill brainwashing? Fair enough, it is pretty extensive. The reason everything went bad is directly because of WWI and II, during both of which he was a villain.
