[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 20260829-082645.jpg (541 KB, 1080x2185)
541 KB JPG
People say they care about privacy, but then they say nothing about their iPhone showing them ads for everything they talk about privately.

Your own iPhone and Alexa devices spy on you. Would they help police catch your attacker? No. But a flock camera would.
>>
File: twitter 27.jpg (95 KB, 1073x763)
95 KB JPG
>>541630620
>Your own iPhone and Alexa devices
Implying I own any of that shit.
>>
>>541630620
>iphone
>alexa
I don't have these. I specifically refuse to use a cell phone because of Snowden and Assanges' revelations of the crimes being perpetrated against me.
>>
>>541630620
>but then they say nothing about their iPhone showing them ads for everything they talk about privately.
Literally everyone notices this at some point and thinks it’s creepy. Maybe they don't throw out their phone, but they still don't like it
>>
>>541630620
>starting an anti fourth amendment company
sedition, execute
>>
>>541630681
The good thing about Flock cameras is you don't need to opt-in to enjoy their benefits, even if you're scared of technology they will still keep your safe
>>
Jews hate the constitution. Case in point. Deport her ass like milo.
>>
>>541630620
>Apple
>Aamazon
I mean it's awkward for a company to sue an individual and generally not done
but you could sue another company or the government itself
this "universally agreed upon" statement that Apple or Amazon "spy on you" is both ill defined as well as unproven to whatever interpretation that entails
>the rest
I wouldn't even comment upon, mostly >>541630678 sums it up
>>
I like how the pro flock argument oscillates between telling you how you are always being spied on anyway and how it's still super needed for safety. If everyone is already getting spied on, why do we need flock?
>>
Flip phone4lyfe

Death to smartphone fags
>>
plot twist

flock can legally only see and record individuals that waived their right to privacy by using FAGMAN devices or services like social media or a personal surveillance brick with a stock rom
>>
>>541630620
>juden
>hole
Opinion discarded.
>>
>>541630620
>I'm pro-[insert corporation]... if [insert-corporation] wants to hire my company...
>>
>>541630620
>Make America Safe Again
>MASA

Lmao.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.