>>541631896
trash bags over the flocks is a better solution to them.
destroying them is going to immediately alert them to replace it. they will replace it because you pay taxes. and a trash bag over it just disables it, doesnt destroy it, so you arent looking at a felony.

>>541632080
Hindering the license plate reader’s ability to track criminal activity is actively impeding investigation, i.e. obstruction. Depending on the state, that could make you an accessory to the crime you are helping cover up.

>>541632196
there has to be a crime to investigate in the first place. dragnetting is still illegal
and destroying a decoy is vandalism at worst. this tactic will not catch on.

>>541631896
It's fake so how is it a felony charge, it was probably less than 50 bucks of property damage. Its going nowhere in court

>>541632196
>obstruction
the burdeon of proof is on them to prove that there was an ongoing investiation
also an ongoing investigation requires judicial backing so they can't just lie about it
>>541632444
>there has to be a crime to investigate in the first place
nailed it
>destroying a decoy is vandalism at worst
bingo
> this tactic will not catch on
poor man's sting
usually you'd want to sting large drug traffic operations
not a couple of drunk teenagers kicking a trash bin
it's both hilarious and desperate

>>541631896
Just be a nigger and steal the camera, rip out the useful internals or resell them online idk

>>541631896
This is actually an amazing idea.
>Print our own fake cameras
>Put them up in the communities that "for some reason" don't have one in them
>Wait till their schizophrenia makes them chimp out

>>541632080
>put a bag over it
>wait until the company employee comes to remove it
>pop his tires
>put bags over every one in town

Oblem prolved.

>>541631896
Eventually the only way to do this is to vandalize flock cameras then kill anyone that shows up to repair them.

>>541631896
>felony charges
Police fucked up. Jury will nullify.

Moving the goalposts on a whole new level