Why is attempted murder a lesser sentence than murder? You tried to murder, the intent was to kill. You just failed, but in intent you are the same as a murderer and should be treated the same.
If you kill a killer, the number of killers stay the same
>>541642583If you kill a murderer, the number of murders decreases.
>>541642583If you jizz on a German, the number of faggots in the world remains the same
>>541642401Because the result is not the same
>>541643357Obviously, but the intent is as I said
>>541642401It depends, what race was the intended victim?
My argument is that the intent matters. For example if someone shoots at a person but fails to kill, they are the same morally as someone who shot and killed. They both had the same intent, just that one missed.
>>541642401Attempted murder? Now honestly what is that? Do they give a Nobel prize for "attempted chemistry," do they?
>>541643320what’s up with americans and the constant homosexual references? is it something in the water?
>>541643320Kek
>>541642401Attempted murder is a victimless crime, if you really think about it.
>>541644483Don't drink da water Germanon... kikes have their weekly synagogue circle jerks.Rabbis get to suck dozens of schmeckles.
>>541642401Attempted murder is still a serious charge. I know a guy doing 20 years for that.
With actual murder a person diedIt is counterintuitive that a bad person would get less harsh punishment just for being unsuccessful but it's not the only factor that goes into punishments. The victim and victim's family lost more if murder attempt was successful and this payback element is part of legal system
>>541642401Because the justice system considers the death a heavier debt than the attempt to kill.It's all about resolving perceived debts, OP.It's nothing to do with right or wrong, it's conflict resolution and debt planning.
>>541642401There are cases where attempted murder should be punished more harshly than murder, such as when it causes severe lifelong injury to the victim. For instance, there was a case over there in Bong land where some voodoo witch was mad about being rejected by her ex boyfriend, so she tried to kill him with sulfuric acid. He didn’t die, but the attack left him blind, paralyzed from the neck down, and without a leg. He eventually decided to sign up for assisted euthanasia because he had zero quality of life left. She argued that she shouldn’t be held responsible for his death because he brought it upon himself. She was cleared of murder charges.
>>541643428yes but punishment is result + intent. Believe it or not thought crime should not have the same punishment as real crime if any
>>541642401The successful guy obviously is more dangerous.
>>541642583You must be 18+ to post here.
>>541642401A half hearted attempt stopped by conciense shows less evil tand chance to repeat than remorseless premeditated murderHail Fauci
>>541644483Yes
>>541647712attempting to murder someone but failing is not "thought crime""thought crime" would be it's illegal to think about murdering someone
>>541642583So if we kill two we can call it progress?
>>541647712Driving a car at someone, shooting at them etc, whether you succeed or fail, the act is the same. You lost control of your emotions, or you deliberately chose to do an act with the intent to kill.
>>541651382I'm not saying that. I just took it to its logical conclusion. Thinking can be construed as intent >>541651571Yes but you didn't actually kill someone so so it's clearly not the same.
>>541651858>Yes but you didn't actually kill someoneMy whole argument is that doesn'tmatter. You intended to kill, and only luck prevented that rather than your own decisions. So you are the same as someone who succeeded in killing with the same action. The action is the crime, the result is dependent on RNG.
Also clearly in context I am meaning the intent in the act, not just thinking about it. Attemped murder is an act with the intent to kill. The action with intent to kill is the same whether you succeed or fail.
>>541642583>Implying I wasn't a killer before
