Democracy>Vote harder>Nothing changesMonarchy>King is shit>Deposed by competing NobilityIt's clearly the superior system.
Of course tranny faggy likes this. Yes England is a dump
>>541693038>Deposed by competing NobilityOr puppeted which would be worse.
>>541693038Monarchy only works with serfdom.
>>541693132England is proof democraxy doesn’t work. America mogs England in every way, monarchy is superior You’re a tranny
>>541693038The next great conflict will see monarchy restored in the West.Don't know which nation it will be in, but you'll definitely see it.
>>541693038Why do you suck dick and feed your anus cocks ?
Prussian Frederick II introduced cucked version of kingship as "first servant of the state". And jews need the state as immortal "highest authority", so they can use this relatively modern legal entity for permanent sovereign debt. A traditional king's debt was often discontinued by his successor. This was the main problem of jews with monarchies.[citation needed]
>>541693038We already practically are a monarchy in the sense that it’s the same wealthy ruling class that remains in power. They take turns sitting on the throne, but it’s the same group of people.
>>541693639It's not at all the same thing.The real power brokers are hidden from the public and the people are set against each other instead of the powers that be as a direct consequence of democracy where the people believe voting changes anything.The people in power does not need to fear the people in democracy, that is not true for pretty much any other type of government.
>>541693038yes but consider>king is good>deposed by evil jealous younger brother (who cant rule for shit) by luring the kings sole heir into a wilder beast stampede
>>541693038Because everybody fear jews and free masonshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeHvNZ4F5qk
Ever since the "enlightenment", the entire world has been in the grip of a bourgeois, mercantile oligarchy.In order to revert, you'd need someone like a Caesar to turn out this conspiracy of villains and psychopaths. So far, he hasn't appeared.
>>541693639>the same wealthy ruling class that remains in powerthat is an oligarchy. Ironically, monarchies tend to be less monolithic in nature
>>541693038They did, under Hitler, but then were conquered by their mutt colonies
>>541694601>implying that caesar was not a product of the very system you claim he "turned out"I will admit, caesar is a very interesting character in history, and if you study his political and military maneuvers it is hard not to hold some semblance of admiration for him. At the end of the day however, it is very clear that he was not motivated by anything remotely resembling "justice" or "morals" (though I will admit he appeared to adhere strongly to his own personal principles). He merely wished to consolidate the pieces of the pie, and tried his best to make damn sure he was the only one serving the pie; he was no different from any other power hungry megalomaniac when it was all said and done.
>>541695232Yes, Caesar was just a broom, Augustus did most of the actual reform work.Autocrats/kings can be good or bad, depending on the throw of the dice. A bad one will eventually die of old age, if nothing else.But oligarchies can endure forever, by constantly replenishing their ranks.Orwell explained the concept well in his book-within-a-book in 1984.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Theory_and_Practice_of_Oligarchical_Collectivism
>>541693038Because you're stuck with a shitty king for decades only for a gamble of getting another shitty king or a decent to good king.Meanwhile politicians are switched out from time to time.
>>541693038There are countries that still have monarchies that technically have control over the nation's militaries: UK, Spain, Norway, Sweden... they just aren't doing jackshit and only care about money. Evidently the enlightenment era bros from early America had it right.
>>541695664Man, that's crazy.When was the last time we had a competent prime minister?I guess one could argue for Reinfeldt but he used his competence to subvert Sweden, not to help Sweden.
>>541695799I agree, we haven't had very competent prime ministers. But switching from one shitty system to another shitty system won't solve having shitty leaders.
>>541695880Isn't it crazy that you growing up in a democracy was repeatedly taught in school that democracy is good and monarchy is bad?
>>541693038kikes and foids
>>541695778They don't have monarchs, they have tourist attractions.The UK didn't even have a monarch at the time of the American revolution. All royal powers had been transferred to parliament in 1688. "Overthrowing the tyrant King George" is a fairy story peddled by the American education system.
>>541695958Democracy is arguably better.
>>541696003Wrong. The militaries of every European country (ones applicable) are swear an oath of allegiance to the monarchy. They can take control back at any time they want. But they don't want to. They want to just soak up tax payer money, worry about their paintings and castles and shit, and make short PR recordings of 'we need to accept refugees!' otherwise Mr. Globalism might take away deals that give them even more free money. 'Nobility' is not noble - it never was. They're just flawed humans as any other and greedy cunts with animality in their hearts -- a selfish bunch uncaring of the people.
>>541696123Sure, one could argue that. it's just weird that pretty much all democracies are facing extreme decline after 50-200 years of democracy when they were stable monarchies for Lang centuries before.
>>541696123If you’re a retard maybe
>>541696227Their oath is to the head of state.Their paychecks come from the parliaments.
>>541696123Democracy only works if the least amount of people can vote though.
>>541693038I miss our Sun King so much, bros.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQk-FvXAXC0
>>541696306Their oaths are to the monarchy. See:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head_of_the_Armed_ForcesTrust me they're just selfish, greedy cunts. These 'kings' could be helping the people any time they want. They're just blinded by their fancy possessions and money in their private lives to give a fuck about you. Famously the direct decendent of Brian Boru in Ireland was more interested in getting his fucking paintings back using taxpayer's money during a financial crisis.
>>541693038>Inbreds with wierd metabolic and mental deficiencies.The best!
>>541696269>it's just weird that pretty much all democracies are facing extreme decline after 50-200 years of democracy when they were stable monarchies for Lang centuries before.It's not that weird since a lot of cultures doesn't allow for people to have a voice if it goes against tradition. Sweden got somewhat eased into democracy for about two centuries by gradually removing the monarchs power after abuse of power. It began with Karl XII fuck up.>>541696380That's how it started, but even then the grass wasn't much greener if at all. When you have minority deciding for their own wellbeing and the majority just have to live with those decisions, with sometimes the cost of their own wellbeing, will only lead to further dissatisfaction which eventually will cause problems. Even more now since people have had the right to vote for a bit over 100 years now. You need a military uprising if you want to change from democracy now, and most democracies doesn't have privately owned military. They are publicly owned.
>>541696003Because it’s part of the lie that we just didn’t want a kind we wanted democracy. In reality the Founders wanted a republic where we had RIGHTS. The same rights that the jews and bolsheviks and boomers and the rest all hate with their heart and soul.
>>541696467There are only three real monarchies left in Europe: Liechtenstein, Monaco, and the Vatican. All others have been neutered by the merchant class, after the merchant class genocided the nobility.
>>541696710>Want to be elected into office? Just cannibalize this child for me in camera real quickMuch better!
>>541696906The founders were masonic faggots that worshipped jews. They didn’t care about liberty they just used that to stir up the poor against their mother country. They are all burning in hell as we speak.
>>541696929Don't be naive. All monarchies in Europe have direct control of the nation's militaries. Their parliaments even have stipulations that the monarchy could dissolve them at any time becoming the despot. The merchant class did nothing but bribe the monarchies with free money. That's it. These 'nobles' only care about money and people kissing their ass. They do not give two fucks about your home being given to Abdullah from Pakistan and trucks being plowed into theaters full of people. Naive Monarchism is a repeated pattern that always falls flat -- colloqually 'if only the Emperor knew' - the emperor does know and he does not and never cared.
>>541697198>All monarchies in Europe have direct control of the nation's militaries.Not in Sweden since 1975. Hell, you have the smaller parties constantly suggesting getting rid of the monarchy because the royal family costs tax payer money.
>>541693038Mainly because of that guy's family. The Bourbon dynasty are the biggest bunch of retards imaginable. The Habsburg dynasty were inbred but still far more competent than them.>When the Bourbons were restored in 1814, these émigrés returned to their country with exactly the same mentality they had left 25 years earlier. Talleyrand said of them: “They learned nothing and forgot nothing.”
>>541693038>literally cucked by politiciansyeah you're a real spaniard, no vpn
>>541697198You are the most naive nigger around. The Prince of Luxembourg tried to block a law that permits Euthanasia and parliament just passed a law saying that they don’t need royal assent for anything and stripped him of all his real power. Modern monarchs are vestigial organs, the real power behind these nations are high finance.
>>541697357>Not in Sweden since 1975. Hell, you have the smaller parties constantly suggesting getting rid of the monarchy because the royal family costs tax payer money.Well you can just look at your neighbor Norway which still does and see how wonderful their royal family is. Their princess married an American scam artist that peddled magic crystals, another princess was caught begging Epstein for his children, and a prince is under SA charges. Oh yeah and the Norway monarchy is doing 0 about national troubles.
>>541697617>Well you can just look at your neighbor Norway which still does and see how wonderful their royal family is.Sure, but I just answered autistically since the claim was "all monarchies in europe".
>>541693038They are dangerous to the jewish banks.A monarch with a heart can merely declare circumcision and usury illegal. What will the rabbis and the bankers do then? No, they need to have a popularity contest among the immature, to ensure the candyman rules- and there is no heart making any decisions.
>>541693038If you were going to restore all the monarchies, you'd absolutely have to get rid of the current stock of nobility and start over. Almost all the current blue bloods are incredibly low quality. Bunch of retarded neoliberal globalists. An ideal monarchy would have better rulers as time went on. Currently, the opposite is true. Just look at britain. Queen Elizabeth>Charles, and his kids are even worse than him. Like 80 iq between the two.
>>541697497>The Prince of Luxembourg tried to block a law that permits Euthanasia and parliament just passed a law saying that they don’t need royal assent for anything and stripped him of all his real powerNo fuck you the Luxembourg grand duke is sworn an oath to by their military. They can march into their own parliament and tell them to go fuck themself. You forget how these monarchies got their power in the first place - I'll give you a hint: it wasn't money. (except the first chinese emperor)
>>541697842> the Luxembourg grand duke is sworn an oath to by their military. They can march into their own parliament and tell them to go fuck themselfDo you wear a helmet to bed?
>>541698087>ad hominemLow IQ, animalistic faggot detected. Being the head of a military you can order them to march on anywhere. But of course you can't conceptualize in your stupid head except upsaled Nikes and basketball like a normoid dumbfuck.
>>541693038Dictatorship is even better. The royal bloodline in a monarchy can be targeted by jews and contaminated with foreign genes, so it's a natural point of weakness, but dictatorships don't have to worry about that.
>>541698458>but dictatorships don't have to worry about that.Why not?
>>541695880Democracy:>Finally get one good prime minister(impossible difficulty)>He only gets 4 years to do his thing before another shitty one ruins his work in 4 monthsMonarchy:>Finally get one good king(less than impossible difficulty)>Country enjoys a golden age for decades, because he rules long enough to actually make a difference
>>541698458>Dictatorship is even better.Russia is now 15% muslim with Putin glorifying how fast they're breeding. This winter most of the country will be without power and food. All this so he can run a multiyear war against a people that were a part of his country not 30 years ago. Then we can get into how insanely corrupt the entirety of the Russian oligarchy is. No dictatorships aren't any better -- in fact they're worse because at least with blue bloods you can just bully them until their retreat to their gated pavilions with the supplementary prostitutes.
>>541693038>Royals get DEW with cancer or blackmailed>Checkmate>Islamo-marxist floods the countylol, lmao!!! no thanx.
>>541693038>MonarchyThe best Government is a good king, by far. The current system is in gridlock. Real change cannot happen w/o a reset. The Magna Carta, which led to Parliament and Congress, with a division of powers was always a mistake. Hence the English Civil War and the French Revolution and the current clowns in the US Congress. A GODLY King needs to rule w/o interference. He can appoint whom he chooses.
>>541698492There is no royal bloodline in dictatorship. So unless the entire race ends up race mixed, there will always be genetically pure candidates for leadership available.
>>541698669>He only gets 4 years to do his thing before another shitty one ruins his work in 4 monthsIn Sweden, as long as the party gets re-elected and accepted by the riksdag, we can have the same prime minister for several decades.
>>541698793>There is no royal bloodline in dictatorship. So unless the entire race ends up race mixed, there will always be genetically pure candidates for leadership available.And this matters because..?
>>541698697>Russia is 15% muslimThat's still better than the US, UK, France and Germany. Meanwhile North Korea is 99.998% Korean, and doesn't have a jew controlled Central Bank.
>>541698839Because race mixing is bad.
>>541693038there is no god and monarchies are all frauds
>>541693038>Why hasn't the West reverted to Absolute Monarchy yet?We have, but it's all jewish behind the scenes anon.
>>541694601>you'd need someone like a Caesar to turn out this conspiracy of villains and psychopaths.Trump
>>541698794>we can have the same prime minister for several decadesThat was true for Hungary too, until a bad leader won a single time and changed it to keep the good leader (Orban) from ever getting into power again.
>>541693038We are under an Absolute Monarchy, as Jesus Christ is Lord and King over all.
>>541693038fascism is the way
>>541696420Me too confrère, me toohttps://youtube.com/watch?v=I6vFNYJMlzs
>>541699481We looked at the data and found that chirst is king of jews, not of all.>>541693038Under actualbmonarchy you can't have capitalism and free flow of capital as much.
>>541699481Thats Platos philosopher king, another anon erroneously attributed to a Christian king. Some of the greatest men were not anti abrahamic, just not adjacent. Cyrus for example, its why Trump is cryus inside Israel politics. But i digress, the problem with your statement is theres a few billion, me included, that say then hand over USA to the vatican. No? Then you need a Republic to ensure the philospher king (ones self, JC) wins.
In the end, the difference is nominal. The powerful rule, the peasants obey. Back then it was the aristocrats, now it is the capitalists.
>>541693231America is a democracy though
>>541701815>the powerful ruleits more about where the concept of power derives from anon. You either stand with divine right to rule or you stand with the state, there is no politics. Thats what the dichotomy is of power.
>>541693038president has more power than any king has ever wielded. fallen for the easiest scam in the books with operation left rightsmonarchy is a much better checks and balances.democracy works when the population maintains a certain culture and education requirement (to vote at least). problem is, as was seen with fbi director mccarthy's project failing and subsequent reputation tarnished, there is 0 checks to cultural subversion with democracy. in a generation every western country was allowed to be flooded with propaganda.a king at least has their own interests to maintain so has incentive to stop it. a king is also trained from birth with machiavellianism to spot manipulation.
>>541702018troll post? democracy = capitalism is American soft power. Not sure about pozzed education these days, but theres not one part of the process in USA thats democratized. Its all proportion based, Republic. There is not one office that rests on popular vote
>>541702090the read pill for me was long ago thinking, imagine a Lord having to see the people often and shit. 100% more interactive with their peasants then CEOs. They had to at least know they had to face their peasants
>>541693231the United Kingdom is not a popular vote run nation, what is this comment? This isnt a white person speaking
>>541693038Because an absolute monarchy doesn’t make sense without any power. We already have one absolute monarch that makes sense, the pope, and we don’t need another.Maybe one day an emperor will emerge and we will get a monarch again. Maybe it will happen in Russia when it decides to nuke and conquer europe.Maybe in America if they decide to get rid of the Jews.If that happens, he will have to pay homage to the pope.Until then, there is nothing much to discuss
>>541693038I think voting census would work. Like only people who pay 1 mln a year in taxes can vote. No more silly populism and retarded people forgetting what happened 4 years ago. There would be a very limited voting base of money earners who are harder to trick with cheap demagogy aimed at 80iq peons.
>>541693038Because Judeo-Freemason amerimutt golems
