This short book is banned in almost every country on earth.It's called "Supercommunism". It advocates for society where every being (human, animal) is cared for, is happy, is not exploited, while avoiding common pitfalls of standard communism.Definitely worth reading. I recommend.The short book is here:https://web.archive.org/web/20260218025138/https://supercommunism.neocities.org/I will paste some parts of the book in this thread.
>>541723235Not an that interesting to me but I'll just drop this here:https://annas-archive.gl/md5/23ab69bc5115b8ba018ffc78348c7069?&check=1
FemalesWomen equality vs inequality with males. Should women have same rights, same jobs, same everything, as men? No. The evolution made females and males different, they are built in different way and their purpose in society was always different and should be different. Females have different skeletons, brains, hormones, looks, strength, hobbies. They shouldn't do same things as males. If evolution "thought" that equality is good, then females and males would look the same, have same brains, skeletons, everything.What a "equality" policy of females does is, it destroys the diversity of the sexes. This is invented by capitalists, because they don't need males and females, they need workers, or actually, slaves. They want males and females to look in same way and do same jobs. This will also tank birth rates, but capitalists don't care about that because they don't think long term. They only want short term profits, even if they will destroy society or planet Earth.Capitalists invented "equality" and put women into workplace in order to have double amount of workers and to drop the wages by half. They want women and men to compete for jobs.But should we have full segregation of the sexes like in the middle east and Afghanistan? Not necessarily. If full political power is given to males, they often do wars, war crimes, nazism, holocaust and all kinds of stuff. Also, some females have male talents and they are capable of doing male jobs. This is why I am leaning to a compromise system, where most females should be stay-at-home wives or work female jobs like nurses, but some females could have real careers and work in male jobs.One possibility is a two-tier system, where a young female is tested for her intellect and talents and she is either classified into a mother/wife or into a career woman. The first one will have to marry someone and give him babies and cook food, while the second one will be allowed to study, work, do male jobs, drive a car.
Females 2 Another possibility is that all women, when young, would be wives and have babies, but later when their kids are bigger they would go to work.Women should have about 2-3 babies, they should have them when they are young, after this they could study or work. But not all women should be mothers. We should ban all alternatives to motherhood, such as owning cats or dogs and treating them like children.Females and males, maybe should be segregated in schools. Females should be taught how to be a good wife, how to cook, clean the house, how to care their babies. They should be married off when they are young, like 12 year old to a 30+ year old males, as both of them are in their peak attractiveness. After the wife raises the kids, maybe she could go to study and get some job.Divorces. Divorces are bad and they are promoted by the capitalists. They need divorces because after divorce the couple needs two houses/apartments instead of one. A lonely woman is also sad and buys a lot of wine, products, movies, she buys a lot of stuff to fill her shallow and empty life. Divorces = less children. Divorces = children do not have families. I am not saying divorces should be fully banned, but they should be restricted, a couple should first try to fix their relationship and not jump to divorce.Should rape in marriage be allowed? Or if not, at least, wives should be punished for not giving sex with fines and arrest, or divorced with their fault. Giving sex is wife's duty.Adultery. Adultery should be punished. But I am not sure if males should also be punished for it, or only females. The adultery of a male and female are not the same thing.We need to lower age of marriage. If sex with 12 year old girls was bad, the evolution wouldn't give them puberty and period, and evolution wouldn't make them sexy. But they have period, can be impregnated and they are sexy, so it's clear that nature and evolution want us to fuck and impregnate little girls.
>>541723235>It advocates for society where every being (human, animal)So is society supposed to stop animals from brutally killing each other or?
>>541723703>We need to lower age of marriage. If sex with 12 year old girls was bad, the evolution wouldn't give them puberty and period, and evolution wouldn't make them sexy. But they have period, can be impregnated and they are sexy, so it's clear that nature and evolution want us to fuck and impregnate little girls.Fucking kill yourself.
>>541723235>everybody should just be nice and stuff.Thats nice Timmy, now go do your chores or you're not getting your allowance this month
>pls read my shitty book of schizo ramblingsNo.
infantile and superficial takesno deeper thoughts, could have been made by some teenage tiktoker trying to ragebait
Females 3 Sex and marriage with little girls is illegal because of organized mafia of capitalists and old females. Capitalists do not want men to have good things for free, while old females do not want better competition, they cannot compete with little girls. Little girls are superior in every way to old hags.When women are allowed to select their sexual partner, they choose a loud drug addict with tattoos, he knocks her up, she has his baby, then he dumps her and she is a single mother. Is this good for society? Or woman chooses popular rock singer who fucks 1000 other women, the woman gets STDs from him and he will not be a father that supports this 1000 babies. Is this good for society?Of course it's not. Women have to be banned from selecting partners, because they are not capable of selecting a partner. In old times and current times in other societies, the father chosen to who he will give his daughter, but this is also not great, it has many issues. We could have some mixed system, where a woman wouldn't be allowed to freely choose her husband, but she would be given choice of few men that are suitable, then meet and know all of them, and make a choice. But maybe this is bad, to give her choice at all.Another option, is to use computer algorithm, that will select best choice, pair most fitting man and woman, so that both are happy and produce quality children.
>>541723746>So is society supposed to stop animals from brutally killing each other or?Yes. (unironically). We have to stop this. We cannot let nature doing nasty things.
>>541723235WHOMST'VE IS ENFORCING IT
>>541723235No such society can exist. Man is imperfect, and so everything that man creates is imperfect. Trying to create a perfect system for society is likely to cause even greater harm and tragedy than looking out for those closest to you, because none of us is able to reliably predict fourth or fifth order consequences of our policies without practical testing.
>>541723235Yes Jews don't want you to know that it's possible to live in a utopia if you let every 100 home commune produce it's food, water, energy independently, you will essentially have free food, water, electricity and people to trust and guarantee a job since birth
Ok you wasted 3 posts on what to do about women, but what about the jews and the niggers?
>>541723703This, 1000% true, the governments did so much social engineering to make this sound like hell
>>541723514>If full political power is given to males, they often do wars, war crimes, nazism, holocaustAt first it was based till it became cringe in this part. Who the fuck do you think is behind capitalism? Are the Natzees controlling the banks, blackmailing politicians and making propaganda on mass media?
That i is a the most juvenile collection of ideas ever concocted. The Turner Diaries is more plausible
>>541724554Lybia under gaddafi was going to start this with having communes that produce it's own food, water, energy etc... NATO Jews didn't like this cuz they knew if it was implemented it would make their capitalistic model so shit, so they bombed him
Supercommunism?Does that mean more supercorruption, supergulags, superlong bread lines?
>>541724712Soviet union was fake communism, if you read Lenin he never wanted a centralized state that controls everything from the economy a'd he never wanted the state to control the food production either
>>541724753>It wasn't REAL communism.Fuck outta here mentally ill psychopathic commie scumbag.
>>541724819Why do you think they killed trotsky? It's because he wanted real communism and he ended up being right about everything he even predicted the soviet unions collapse, keep being a wagie retard working for your capitalist masters, you don't even know if they feed you tyranny chemicals to make you compliment secretly
>>541725008*complient
>>541723235I don't want my enemies to be happy. They should hurt.
>>541725028Under supercommunism, there won't be enemies, all people will be allies.
>>541723235>It advocates for society where every being (human, animal) is cared forthe problem here is that somebody has to do the caring, and thats an awful lot of work, so that guy is going to need a team, and even thats not going to be enough, you have to spread the work out. like if everyone pitched in, then life would be easy. and actually if everyone just took care of themselves, then it would be so easy that you wouldnt need this system in the first place. and a actually we have that system already, its called adulthood.
>>541723870But enough about Nein Kampf
>>541725008hey pssst your hair looks really nice today
>>541723235Who exactly does the caring, makes people happy and makes sure people are not exploited then?
>>541725755The work will still exist, there will be doctors, nurses, electricians etc.But they will work part time and for their local community.If we stop big pharma cartels from ruining our health, we won't need so many doctors and hospitals like we need now. We won't need so many car repair services because cars won't be designed to break after few years.Little work will be needed.
>>541723235Is that your book? You shilling here?
>>541725008>keep being a wagie retard working for your capitalist mastersThey pay me pretty good to run their machines and I have 4 ten hour shifts. I agreed to work for them and I have yet to have a commie offer me a better deal. Many of the ideas that the OP posted I agree with, however, he is far too focused on women and not the jews and the niggers.
>>541726013No.
>>541725867>We won't need so many car repair services because cars won't be designed to break after few years.The biggest mistake this country made was having companies be beholden to the stock holders and not the customers. Technology has progressed in every industry everywhere yet things are not only more expensive, the quality is downright shit. Not to mention everything becoming subscription based service. IT'S THE FUCKING JEWS
>is banned>here's the link
>>541726657It is banned from neocities, you have to use web.archive to access it.
>>541723235Let me guess>let's go back to gorilla niggerism so the theory can work
All delusions of communism will never work as long as niggers, jews, and jeets are alive on this earth.Be cursed with this knowledge.
where exactly is ur blogpost banned kiddo ? take ur meds. right now.
>>541723235Is communism without enslaving a portion of the population possible? How does supercommunism reward those who engage in difficult or undesirable labor/risky jobs?If it does not reward them with special privileges, how does supercommunism ensure those jobs get done?
>>541726234Very cool anon wish I could find a job, I'm talking about real poverty eradication,you would also eliminate the need for migrants... Also my bad, trotsky sucks dick and is a rat, makhno is the real Chad, he is the one that would have made this possible but (((they))) stabbed him in the back.
>>541727330>How does supercommunism reward those who engage in difficult or undesirable labor/risky jobs?>If it does not reward them with special privileges, how does supercommunism ensure those jobs get done?Everybody in supercommunism gets free food and shelter. But if you will work, you will receive more items and stuff. This will motivate some people to work.Also, supercommunism will regulate who can have children, who will spread his genes. People who behave badly or have bad genes would be prevented from having children.
Supercommunism is the future of happiness.
>>541727600capital can be a pile of rockscapital can be favors why work - still applies if you cannot gain capitalyou work for profit - that is moral
Good book.
This book is really banned.
>>541727600People who are most productive and willing to work wont have the ability to raise or birth a lot of kids.So your system encourages those who work to not reproduce.
>>541729731No, under supercommunism nobody will work 40 hours per week like now in capitalism, we will work part time, so there will be plenty of time to raise kids. Also, husband can work while wife can stay at home and babysit.
Supercommunism could revolutionize our lives. Paradise.
This book should be printed.
>>541729731"most productive and willing to work" this is capitalist propaganda instilled from birth which is designed to sap your labor value for the wealthy to remain wealthy.
>>541723235>commies can't find a editor>it's banned everywereIt's very stupid from what I could read, at the level of children.
>>541723235Fuck you subhuman animal, you deserve death not to be taken care of. FUCKING LOSER
>Gets destroyed by supercapitalism
The future.
>>541732963YOU WILL NEVER WINThe bums will always lose.
>>541723235What do you do for work now and what will your job be when we get super communism?
> It advocates for society where every being (human, animal) is cared for, is happy, is not exploited, while avoiding common pitfalls of standard communism.Leftists fall for the dumbest most pie in the sky delusional shit. Should we all advocate for cotton candy trees and superpowers too? Fucking retards man. It’s all utopian nonsense.
>oh nyo! banned books!read them online then, faggot
>>541733211>What do you do for work nowNothing because there is nothing to work for under capitalism, salary is a joke you can't even buy house and virgin wife.>what will your job be when we get super communism?Dictator. I would be a dictator of supercommunism.
