>U.S nuking Iran means the whole world will die instantlyCan someone explain this logic?
>>541743964perhaps it means than oil era will die instantly
>>541743964No, because Tucker was just being retarded, as is anybody that says that. Nobody in BRICS cares about the other BRICS nations outside of pretending like they're sticking it to the US. None of them like each other. Period. As such, none of them would be coming to the others' aid. And none of them are going to do retaliatory nukes that'd just come back to bite themselves in the ass in order to avenge the IRGC. People forget that the Iranian people are largely okay. It's the IRGC that sucks complete and utter ass, and nobody is going to do anything particularly meaningful to help them.
>>541743964He's being alarmist but then again the jews claiming we need to nuke Tehran are 1000% more alarmist
Have we considered nuking Tel Aviv instead?
>>541743964Gladly Nukes are fake
>>541743964Can anyone start by explaining why we would nuke iran?And no, "muh kikes" isnt an answer.Explain how.many nukes we would use, what the targets would be, and what the strategic objective of using them would be.Nobody can, because the idea is retarded and anyone repeating it is a moron.
>>541744206Based, how do I upvote?
>>541744086If there is no people there is no.need for oil
>>541743964He’s a boomer who was raised son Cold War propaganda about le nuclear winter. That said the logic checks out, if America nukes Iran Russia will be forced to nuke Ukraine to send a message that it’s not weak. That kicks off nuclear war unless this administration suddenly grows foresight which seems unlikely
>>541744263It’s retarded but so was this entire war. If they use nukes my guess is they will be as part of a boots on the ground land war targeting logistics hubs and military bases
He's afraid of nuke normalization where the use by the US will embolden Russia to use tactical nukes and China to start manufacturing insane amounts of nukes.
>>541744263
>>541743964>logictucker carlson called the metric system a demonic tool from satan
>>541743964This has been the agreed upon logic for nearly 80 years retard.Once any country uses a nuclear weapon, against anyone, nuclear weapons forever stop being a deterrent. And thats game over man.
>>541744428It isWe use freedom units, not heathen units, swedecuck
>>541744410Lebanon, Somalia, Sudan and Iran aren't done jobs. In 5x the timeframe they set, they only finished the job in 3 / 7 of their targets, and one of the 3 was turned by Iran into a proxy state (Iraq), so it's really only 2 / 7.
>>541743964Media retards always hype up nuclear weapons to be thousands of times more destructive than they actually are. Such hyperbole is the main reason so many ignoramuses think nuclear weapons are fake.It would 100% destroy the world economy and probably lead to other nuclear powers using their weapons on pesky enemies, and a scramble for all nations to become nuclear armed or absorbed into a nuclear armed nation.Definitely a hellscape panopticon conrtol grid dystopia, but nothing close to ending all human life.
>>541744517except we used two on Japan??????????????(unless you believe the firebomb conspiracy)
>>541743964t.kabalah nigger
Pakistan will nuke Israel if the US nukes Iran. That's why most action in Iran has stopped. Pakistan is already in a refugee crisis because of the US and Israel's attacks on Iran. Over a million refugees so far and that information was from months ago. It could threaten their country's stability, which I'm sure Israel wouldn't mind at all.
>>541744775iirc, in one of his interviews, he claimed he didn't know what that string meant. >>541743964it's this >>541744387
>>541744562The hubris of a jew knows no bounds...
>>541744708even if he believed in that theory, the favt that the people that have control over the world don't act like the theory is true proves that his reasoning is retardedif using nuclear weapons did guarantee MAD between countries that weren't even involved, how would people that had them just not conclude "we should use them, otherwise the people will realize that the conspiracy theory is actually true"it ain't that hard to understand really, countries only care about themselves, and using nukes against another country that has nukes just because they nuked an ally of yours isn't positive EV, because doing nothing might suck, but nuking them in retaliation would guarantee your own destruction, therefore game theory dictates that you shouldn't retaliate with nukesthe problem is that room temperature IQ people can't comprehend this
>>541745444acknowledging your trips, macacoWhen we first dropped them there weren't any other nuclear powers that could have retaliatednow everyone has nukes
>>541744562Yeah they are actually really shitty in bringing their plans to success. I mean the rabbis literally talked about how whites are going extinct within one generation in like the 50s, lmao.
>>541743964Who knows what would happen exactly but for sure it would lead to nuclear proliferation. And from there, much higher risks.I guess, best case scenario, a few other countries build nukes or get very near to building them in secured underground facilities. Maybe the US and other powers help them keep it secret or ambiguous to prevent mass hysteria. And it ends there. Those countries keep their nukes to themselves. Don't use them in wars. Don't fire warning shots. A stable balance of power is established and accepted long-term. There are more areas where the US can't use force and its hegemony shrinks (which was probably going to happen anyway because running the world is getting too expensive). There could be a few wars that happen before involved countries nuclearize. A pre-nuke scramble of sorts where countries try to rearrange their neighborhoods while they still can. And then it would end. There would be more nukes in the world controlled by more governments so the risks would be higher but it could end there. Most nuclear countries probably wouldn't be on a hair trigger like the US/Russia and they wouldn't have a giant arsenal. They'd be minor nuclear powers. But they could still do extreme economic damages.Or, proliferation goes out of control. The early pre-nuke scramble goes badly. No stable balance of power. Small countries start using/sharing their nukes to try to save their asses. From there anything could happen. Maybe the major powers manage to stay out of it and not enough nukes go off to make nuclear winter unmanageable. Maybe they start pre-nuking every other countries that's about to get nukes. Man that would be living in interesting times.
>>541743964Maybe because we are not all religious fanatic jews who want the world to end in a nuclear fire ball so our Messiah will return to protect us and only us.Anyone who wants to normalize nuclear Armageddon should be erased from the planet.
Israel is America's dependable friend and closest ally in the region. Just ignore Tucker QATARLSON. He says he's Christian but just LOVES THE MUSLIMS.
>>541743964Serbians killing an Austrian prince will mean Britain declares against Hungary.
Removing the nuclear weapons taboo to damage but not destroy pickaxe mountain is a retarded idea. If I was Russia I would immediately look for a place to use a tactical nuke in Ukraine just to make the point clear
>>541744206Upvote
>>541743964It means that market forces can decide what to nuke which is definitely the end of the world.
>>541743964Reminder that the US could actually get away with nuking Iran without much consequence.They literally already got away with using nukes against Japan at a time when they didn't control countries to the degree they do now.The US has no shortage of vassals states that consistently do as they are told.>b-but Russia and China!Exactly, they'll bitch and moan but won't drop nukes unless they are being directly threatened.
How would a nuclear war between Russia and the US affect you personally?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xthzy1PxTA
