With all the baby killer shit going on I think it's a good time to discuss something that we have suspected for a long time. SIDS is just women killing their babies. People typically don't just "die" suddenly, there is a reason.I don't have the greentext of the guy describing this. But I want to know if instances of SIDS is common across the board or if those numbers drop to nothing in single parent father headed households, ie when dad has the baby.If the number with dad is practically zero, then the answer is clear, SIDS is just a cop out for bitches killing their babies.
>>541774560>People typically don't just "die" suddenlyWoah there chud they do if they've been vaccinated and as we know babies are immediately vaccinated after birth.
>>541774560Ingesting take but you must also weight number of deaths against time spent with kid. If women spend 20h/day on average vs men 5h/average you should observe 4x death rate with females if no wrong doing is committed
>>541774560I think vaccines cause SIDS, there are crazy women out there, but not nearly that many.
>>541774781Well, if the numbers are consistent through all households then it may point to that. We need to eliminate this possibility though.
>>541774792You’re fuckin brainded
>>541774560>SIDS is just women killing their babies. People typically don't just "die" suddenly, there is a reason.this was a subplot in pol's favorite movie 'Falling Down'detective Pendergast suspected his wife of killing their child, the movie was misogynist to the core
>>541775036No more brother wars. They could have cleaned things up, together.
>>541774560I just did an AI research on this. The best data it could find was from some researcher named Tappin, who did collect data on SIDS from single-parent households (mostly mothers) vs two-parent households... and buried it, calling it insignificant instead of releasing the data, claiming what was really relevant was whether the baby was alone when he died, taking the mothers word for truth that she had just left!My gut calls bullshit: they knew and hid it, OP.NEVER LET A WOMAN ALONE WITH YOUR CHILDREN, ANONS, NOT EVEN THE MOTHER.
>>541774983How so? If sids is not related to parent, it's probability should be distributed evenly in time (unless it's more probable at some time of day for some reason). If it is not, then probabilities in time for sexes would differ. Where am I wrong?
>>541776015It's not that he buried the whole data, from what I gather on AI summary (I didn't read the whole thing in the few minutes since you created the thread), it's just that they lumped "single vs two parents" into "noise" like whether the mother smoked, or other dumb shit, presenting that the only significant factor was leaving the baby to sleep alone.I couldn't even get the AI to cough up data on baby alone in room, but parent was in the house and probably lied, vs alone but with two parents in the house making it that much harder to lie. Maybe it's skill issue on steering the AI. But idc, I'm convinced.
>>541774800This
>>541774560>I don't have the greentext of the guy describing this.I’ve got this here, anon.
>>541774560>It's the Jews anon, it's always the jews.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6412606/
>>541774983No, he's not, it's entirely common in couples for the father to have oversight over the baby for some time, even if it's nominally the wombmyn's job.>does it die during those times?My gut feeling says "No, but sometimes yes because dad is drunk/a nigger/a pitbull/a junkie criminal/a psycho".
