How can we stop women from ruining the Kingdom?
>>541828110>Gen 3:17What was Adam's first crime?The one satan is trying so hard to hide to the point most people, even those who read it, missed it and are completely unaware that there were TWO crimes.
>>541828110
>>541829295>>What was Adam's first crime?Accepting the race-mixing of Eve
>>541828110>Jews attempting to blame Women
Take their rights away
we should get rid of that "religion" that attempts to blame women for everything, I think
>>541829295You can’t just say that and leave or else I’m going to ask ChatGPT what the Fuck this means. COME BACK NIGGER PLEASE
>>541830054>jews make it illegal to reject whores>heh, guess you’ll be having me (((at my best))) whether you like it or not goy
>>541829295He made eve his god. Then he willfully sinned to seal the deal physically.
>>541830432Why would God put them in the midst of the non-White races and never tell them to erase them? I mean, it with be really simple>Go kill all the non-Adamic peopleThe end. It's really simple. There's this idea that God basically deceived Adam and his descendants so that nowadays everyone believes the "jews", and nothing but white genocide ever happens. It's a weird idea. Why isn't the story more clear that she gendered with a serpent/angel if that's what happened?
>>541830432>>541830702Close.>>541830608Kek, sorry, I'm back. But I would indeed prefer you guys do dig this up yourselves than for me to spoonfeed, lest you say I'm priming you either way. All I'm asking is to read Gen 3:17 and see what to me is plain as day: Adam committed two distinct and equally important crimes, one of which has been completely forgotten.Idk what is the based Bible version in English, so here's KJV:>And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;
>>541828110Take our rib back.
>>541831128So you're saying listening to Eve his wife and 'eating' of the tree were two different things? I guess the comma there could indicate that.
>>541830702>men have been the lesser weaker gender since the startI mean that is the gist of history. Men punching each other over women's attention
>>541831452Every single translation I see, it's clear as day that there are two distinct crimes. Satan hid it, so now we all listen to women and can't see that God literally wrote it down "Hey guys, remember when everything went to shit? Yeah, make sure you write it down that it was because YOU LISTENED TO WOMEN, okay? Don't ever forget that".
>>541831825I went overboard. It was because we listened to woman AND disobeyed God. The verse always clearly uses "and" or something other that makes it sound like "A and B", both were equally important, not just one and completely disregard the other like I just did. Sorry.
>>541831825>>541831890That's an interesting point I'll have to keep in mind. Do you think "eating" of the tree is some type of euphemism for sexual commerce? I've heard that is what the kabbalists say, but what else would explain the "eyes" being "opened"?
>>541828110FOIDSLOP THREAD
>>541828110I think we might have to start having sex with them. Idk if I'm ready though
>>541832347I'll be honest. I'm too dumb and haven't studied that part in depth yet. But I'm inclined to agree with the theory that it was, indeed, sexual sin (not sure about commerce). I think some very smart Saint elaborated on this (but I haven't read it yet). I won't elaborate why I believe so (beyond that appeal to authority, which is not the core of my argument) because I haven't studied it enough to be able to defend this position and wouldn't want to risk leading an honest anon like you down a potentially false and heretical rabbit hole.
.
