Doing 1984 to own the libs
>>541882016>keep America's farmlands under heavy surveillance>preserve liberty and privacy in America's historically Black cities (all of them)
>>541882016only niggers and communists are against flockevery white person supports it
>>541882016People with the last name macintyre are mostly pretentious little pricks.I like his first name though.I think there are multiple arguments against this flock shit:a) it offers the our tech and shekel overlords a lot more control over the retarded goyim.b)it is a slippery slope for even more invasive surveillance technology because "it works so well".Also more social security means less crime, which means less unequal income and wealth distribution. That would be a much more effective solution.
>>541882016>>541882638>>541882774Flock cameras in children's gym classes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMVgdbJqYigHow does this prevent crimes?
>>541882016>jewish D&C thread
>>541882847I wanted to add "somebody think of the children to my post" but then it would have been too much of a ramble.I dont think this flock shit is pedophiles gawking at children i think the problem is that all this technology can be easily abused. For example blackmail people, suddenly something about a political opponent appears (like it does so often doesnt it) or you use it to put citizens under pressure by following the laws extremely rigerously.For example, that is more than 10 years ago some guy that also trains fbi and cia agents said "you are basically commit a crime everyday without you knowing it."OR for example think of germany where you get raided if you say something bad about a politician.Esp. in the current climate this technology is extremely irresponsible.In a super utopia where law enforcement and politicians and tech niggers really adhere to the highest standards this could make sense (and could is a very strong word here). But as it is today, the risk of that being used for evil rather than for good is way too high.Also i simply do not like to be watched.Maybe all those employees should have cameras in their bedrooms, nothing to hide right? That also would be a good sales pitch.
>>541882847It's in case there's a school shooter. If children are slaughtered and our leaders can't see it and enjoy it, the whole ritual is wasted.
>>541883417>is pedophiles gawking at childrenNo, Flock is explicitly about gawking at woman and children. That is why they pointed them at both groups, so they can get nudie shots of both, and since it's a "law enforcement" product the CSAM is "legal". It will never be used against niggers because we already confirmed that Flock itself causes crime enforcement to DECREASE! That's right, the crime resolution rate DROPPED after flock was installed. Turns out it shows niggers doing crime, and cops can then choose to ignore those calls and never enforce laws on blacks. So not only does Flock not actually solve crime in any measurable way, it's already directly being abused. What the fucking point of these things? No crime is resolved, and it just causes more pedo crime! Clear waste of money so cops can fap instead of arresting niggers.
>>541882016Those libs ain’t gonna own themselves
>>541883688Prolong lockdowns to infinity because of the rona.It is about weighting one thing against the other.Just because cops catch a bunch of niggers doesnt mean we should install a total surveillance state.Why dont we put ankle monitors on all people? That also would reduce the crime drastically.
>>541882638Based all White males support an increasingly dystopian surveillance apparatus that will certainly never be used against them
>>541883984Whites don’t commit crimes
