What would it take for you to be Pro-Flock again?
>>541907015You’ve been posting about flock everyday and several times, faggot shill.
>>541907015This issue of privacy in a public place is a Trojan horse for protection of criminalsthe US constitution has become an unfortunate instrument of protection of crime and criminal activity of all kindsNotice that the people whining the loudest against Flock Cameras are Left Wingers
Only brownoids hate flock. ALPRs have been around since 1981. They are used constantly to catch stolen cars. The hysteria only exists now because leftists think they can be used by ice.
How many pro flock twatter threads is this migatroon gonna post
>>541907015If I could unread the book 1984...
>>541907154Not only this, but we must also stand with Israel, our greatest ally, whose capability and willingness to process all the surveillance data is unmatched.
>>541907015No jewish mystery juice, no jewish surveillance network. Simple as that.Your lame psyops won't work, that is all.Now stop polluting the board with your retardation.
>>541907015>What would it take for you to be Pro-FlockIf they were using it to kill niggers, spics, kikes, jeets, chincs, and muzzies.
>>541907015>again. lelTen. Billion. Dollars
>>541907154The US constitution is a liberal document. It's meant to protect individual rights. Flock and other forms of surveillance like it are going agaisnt the document. And those behind it want to normalize it so one day search and seizure can be amended out. That's how you change the US, you normalize something within the private world and it will eventually get into politics. The Christian "right" in the US knew this a long time ago.
>Why are you against the government building a personalized database about you that tracks your behavioral habits, travel routes, economic activity, and personal associations with the exp[licitly stated goal of building a social credit system similar to the one the CCP utilizes? It's the government, they'd never do anything wrong!To preempt the dimwitted rebuttal:>Dude they used it to solve a couple crimes that they could have easily solved anyway without it to convince stupid people to accept it, so why aren't you supportive of it?
>>541907409grand slippery slope argumentThis issue of privacy rights in a public place in such a wide scope is a relatively new phenomenonFrom Google AIBefore 1967: The Supreme Court followed a "trespass doctrine," meaning Fourth Amendment protections applied only to physical property and constitutionally protected spaces like homes, offices, or personal items. Public areas or things outside physical property boundaries had no such protectionSo you seeNew rights are being invented every dayThis is no less pernicious than the 'Right' to abortionit is time these artificially concocted rights are eliminated one by one
>>541907015Always remember that the paid shills on Twitter are not real people and never have to actually live with the consequences of the clownworld they create. They aren’t human the way normal people are. They sold their soul to Satan long ago.
It's going to be hilarious when they're used against miggers doing an impotent chimpout 2 years from now.
>>541907613>>541907154Go back to your Mumbai slum
>again
>>541907015Why do Jews want to abuse the cams? who do they want to traffic?
>>541907613If I wanted to know what some ai agent thought I'd stick my balls in a vice instead. Kill yourself ramshit.
>>541907613The 4th ammendment is not an artificial right you cowshit eating subhuman
>>541907613Did you know that adi shankara was a dirty jew who turned hinduism from an actual religion into a monotheistic noahide slave system? How embarrassing
>>541907702The agent is smarter than you and me, little onAbout time you began to grasp reality
>>54190701550 million dollars and I'll cheerlead for big brother.
>>541907724Did not say that, you of low intelligence
>>541907754Adi Shankara was one of the greatest minds on the planetYou are not worthy enough to even wash his feet
>What would it take for you to be Pro-Flock again?Invite me into your house. I'm going to put my penis on your forehead and you're going to tell me how good it smells. I'm not going to believe you when you say the government's dick smells better. I'm going to beat you because you're a bad little slave, OP. My dick smells better than the government's dick. After you admit that, I'll be OK with putting a bunch of flock cameras around your house to remind everyone what a spineless government sissy you are.
>>541907789You’re literally a brown 70 IQ retard >Protects from unreasonable searches and seizures Being able to track you anywhere you go, warrantless, and collect data on you with no recourse at all times is very clearly an unreasonable search, stupid faggot
>>541907015Nigger.
>>541908021The fact is that you did not have these 'rights' until they were invented in a court room in 1967And ideally criminal supporting degenerates should not have these rights
>>541907015KILL EVERY FUCKING JEWISH RAT!
>>541908038That is only a misuse argumentWhen used for the right purpose. Flock cameras work and provide safety for common people
>>541907191Gas yourself, jew.
>>541908114We didn't have the mass surveillance until the last 30 years.
>>541908114We didn’t have to worry about mass surveillance until very recently. Leave it to a Jeet to not understand the spirit vs. the letter of the law. Constant tracking of your movements and behaviors is very obviously not what the people who wrote the constitution intended you stupid poonigger
>>541908283Maybe but stillTracking an individual and holding data on himDoes not amount to violation of search and seizurePrior to 1967 the cops could always track anyoneand this made it easier to catch criminals
>>541908332Tracking you and your movements is not violation of search and seizure. I think you are being a tad hysterical
>>541908429>Muh rightsTranny
>>541908465I think you are misreading the whole discussionI am not the one in favor of frivolous expansion or rights
>>541908429>searching your whereabouts whenever and wherever we want is not a violation of search and seizure Please kill yourself now
>>541907015I've never seen anyone real defend this shit. It genuinely only ever comes from bots and Israel first faggots.
>>541908021You lost, trannyICE WONIf you're not an illegal immigrant, then you have nothing to hide>>541908038Sorry, but ICE won
>>541907015They could pay me $10.000 a day.
Twitter react thread!
>>541908597Since when did your movements become your private propertyIt appears the English language is being stretched and distorted every daySo that degenerates can have more 'rights'
I voted for trump to be tough on crime. Why would I want to be anti flock?
>>541908601Because it's indefensible when you consider the growing implications of it being used to police thought instead of crime. You can't defend this while considering the nuance.
>>541907015Kill yourself kike
>>541907015I've been thinking about this. If they're going to track devices like this I think I just won't carry a phone.
>>541907015/pol is not a place for bootlickers
>>541908683>My bodily autonomy is not my private property This is how stupid you sound. Just STFU and go away shit skin. You have no stake in my country and I wouldnt ever want to discuss yours.
>>541908762Tranny
>>541908790You sound like a woke feminist right nowProbably why you're so triggered by flock
>>541908834>Petty insultsYou have no argument. You are nothing.
>>541907015Nothing, most people developed the same condition as rich jews, they don't actually care about privacy, they are against them simply because jews want them.
>>541908790What does the state keeping track of your movementshave to do with bodily autonomyperhaps you seek a different choice of words
>>541907015When would any of us have ever been pro flock? I’m not even anti flock I understand the purpose of having cameras at busy intersections and at high security areas like power stations and water reclamation plants. I’m just completely against omnidirectional 4k cameras being EVERYWHERE
>>541908762Not just a phone. They track anything with a mac address. Blutooth devices, laptops, tablets, smart watches, any IoT device.
report and sage
>>541908898Why?What are you afraid of?
>>541908892Because that data will be packaged and sold to corporations. You're too dumb for this conversation. You only see what's in front of you like a nigger. That's why your country is a filthy shit hole. I'm not gonna be compensated and neither will anyone else. How would it ever be a good idea for any government to have a biometric profile of people? You're a submissive little bitch.
>>541907015/pol/tards just secrently want to be raped by niggers, shouldn't come as surprise juding by frequent debates over nigger dicks here
>>541907015can you retards PLEASE spend more money on some real shills instead of these retarded faggots we keep getting. This bullshit has nothing to do with me and yet I am becoming more and more against this shit solely due the lack of quality of your shills. It is beyond embarrassing.
>>541907154That is because the right wingers are placing the cameras, it's the same way right wingers were upset when Obama was listening in on his own people, it's the same way democrats were upset when was Trump's first term and he had all the Obama equipment and info. All in all everything US politician is a massive shill that will sell out their people for a single shekel.
>>541908996Those are fundamentally different questionsThe important question isDid the original 4th amendmentGive a citizen a right against being tracked?Not until 1967, he did notThese 'rights' against being tracked were invented in a court roomThis is an ABUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION of the USAIf you want to change the constitution do it the right wayBy having a constitutional AMENDMENT
>>541907015Maybe you should return to Twitter
>>541909124Please see >>541909130I hold that the "Right to not be tracked"Does not exist in the US constitutionIt was invented in a court room in 1967Prove me wrong
>>541908695ThisAnti-flock is anti-ICE
>>541907015
>>541908734You lost, IMMIGRANT If ICE wants to cover the country in flock cameras, let them... I voted for this THREE TIMES!ICE's flock cameras have my full support
>>541907015More flock cameras.>My city is piloting drone flock cameras that pursue unscannables. They have nowhere left to hide.
I would trust them if they actually started publishing the results, that almost all of the crime comes from black men. I would trust the system when cameras will be used to stop actual crime, instead of arresting white men who criticize Israel
>>541907122he's an actual tranny and his twitter is depressing. Just posting into the void with no replies/likes/whatever every day
>>541909189The supreme Court has ruled many times against public surveillance in different forms. The only way I'd ever support a Flock like system is if everyone, no exceptions, was forced to wear a body camera. Hell, let's go a step further and graft them into people's foreheads. Nothing to hide, nothing to fear, right? If you don't support this you're a criminal and should be put down.
>>541908762>I'm not gonna use a phone to own ICEKYS TRANNYI hope ICE deports you to a random country like Iran
>>541908945That over zealous cops and shitty AI will use the extra information to harass citizens. I had a friend come over and as a cop pulled them over in front of my house because the camera on the front of his car flagged the license plate as not having insurance and it just turned out to be a clerical error on the insurance companies end. That’s all I see flock cameras doing if this becomes to wide spread
/pol/ is dead, where can I have engaging right wing leaning (or extremist on all sides of the spectrum) discussions with people online in an anonymous and neutral setting these days?
>>541908163Yeah but it's not used for the right purposehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_purpose_of_a_system_is_what_it_does
>>541908877ICE and their flock cameras are super popular in the USA
>>541907015>againthat implyes anyone but kikes was ever in favor of Orwellian surveliancei mean how couldn't they be, their neighbourghoods are the onlyones without any cameras, guess zogbots don't wanna risk finding any more undergroud tunnelstop bait thoguh
>>541907015i wanna do illegal shit and not be tracked, sorry
>>541909359>>541909382>>541909393I understand these concernsHowever, it is a FACT, that Flock Cameras help the cops to catch criminalsPerhaps a balance will have to be foundBut being unconditionally against Flock cameras means you are unwitting HELPING CRIMINALS
>>541908898When we supported ICE and the Global War on Terror, you fucking TRANNYTRUMP WON THREE TIMES
>>541909417Slap a camera to this man's chest. He wants to be ruled.
>>541909460>means you are unwitting HELPING CRIMINALSmeans you are *unwittingly HELPING CRIMINALS
>>5419093883 Indians come online every single second. The internet is going to become MUCH worse before it gets any better. Public internet like Instagram is just 80% ran by bots, both posts and comments. You're shouting into the wind for the small offchance of reaching a white man
>>541909015ICE and flock won, tranny
>>541908762They sure didn’t like this one
>>541909460You're just a dumb nigger thinking he's playing intellectually superior devils advocate when really you don't even seem to understand the argument or are just doing a shitty attempt at trolling. You're probably too ill to move much from your general lack of sanitation. I can understand being bored. I don't understand being intentionally retarded and subservient.
>>541909460>help the cops to catch criminalsIn theory, yes but not in practice. In practice, they are used to track white men and antisemitic sentiment. Of course you have no issue with this, as an Indian you are one of the bioweapons that Jews punish us with
>>541909472You agree with an Indian >>541909460that’s is all you mongaloid fuck
>>541909313Immigrants hate flock drones
>>541909520I reached you, so that's something but goddamn It's bleak I miss the old internet
>>541909566>I don't understand being intentionally retarded and subservient.Look up Izzat. Indians think tricking people (even while debasing yourself) is a kind of intellectual endeavour. If you can make someone believe something, that means you have power over them. Obviously it doesn't make sense to a clearheaded white man, but Indians have a couple of screws loose
>>541909572>In practice, they are used to track white men and antisemitic sentiment.I think you are being hyperbolic hereThe same argument could be made against all laws that help law enforcement thenWhat do you propose?That we just dismantle the police?Because ostensibly they could be misused against law abiding citizens?
Lick the boot, lose your teeth
>>541909656>What do you propose?>That we just dismantle the police?I didn't propose anything, but nice work intentionally misrepresenting my arguments. I rest my case
It is sort of correct under the assumption that the people collecting that data are just. Unfortunately, we know they are not.
>>541909596That is a lame way to argue somethingDisplays your intellectual weaknessThat you cannot articulate your own arguments
>>541909656No that’s exactly what they’re used for, they’re used to harass citizens for expressing wrong think. We’ve already seen it out of TEXAS AND FLORIDA where cops in hard red states will go after people who post negatively about isreal and Zionists on public accounts like Twitter and Facebook that shit will get all the worse with more cameras everywhere
>>541909691I suppose you wont explain what the misrepresentation was?
>>541909472he's lucky biden only wanted to be president once instead of taking it from him all 3 times
>>541907015>Being pro surveillanceKill yourself
>>541907154You are a criminal. You are indian. I don't need a magic false computer-god monitoring a hundred million cameras simultaneously, simulating omniscience. I can just see your skin, which the actual God of creation has marked.
>>541909726If that is indeed the case, then the remedy is action against LEOs misusing those powersI think your argument is against corrupt cops not Flock Cameras
>>541909717You want more power to go to the state as a way of balancing out their general incompetence rather than pushing for more competence among law enforcement you push for loss of rights privacy and safety. I have already given my opinions on where I would be comfortable with this sort of technology as their are venerable spots in many cities that I would be fine with a greater ability to surveil I just don’t believe that that is enough to justify its omnipresence as we already have given up enough privacy through the use of phones and the governments used of drones and satellites
>>541907015I'm only against them when they are used to send people citations in the mail. In my area a bunch of people got fined for driving without insurance, when the majority of the people had insurance and the cameras company was using bad data.
>>541907015>paid partnershipjej
>>541907015>againgay retard nigger
>>541909835>your argument against the state mass surveillance system is against the state and not the mass surveillance systemWhat? Private or not I am against any sort of implementation of things like this when all it is going to be used for it to make life worse not better
>>541909761You didn't say anything about my arguments, you just made up something I didn't say (the straw man) and attacked that one. The name of the fallacy comes from a man who creates a fake, weak statue of his enemy (made of straw) and attacks him, and pretends that he attacked his enemy. You are out of your depth, jam boy. You don't belong here, you have no roots and no stake in our countries.
>>541909851It is very much possible for laws to be written and protocols to be madeSuch that there are strict disciplinary actions when Law enforcement misuses their powersHoweverA blanket anti Flock position is not desirableGiven that it is a vital tool in legitimate law enforcement
>>541909656remove all jews and almost every other problem slowly gets resolved naturally
>>541907122I personally don't mind it since flock and surveillence is hitting a level that is finally making a lot of people mad. Maybe we can finally push some ire towards data brokers and privacy rights in general.
>>541909881>driving without insuranceOnce again this is a brown man's game. White men pay their taxes and their insurance dilligently, and follow all the rules. This allows Jews in power to send all our money to sustaining brown families, in our own countries and overseas
>>541909938Alright, what crucial distinction do you make then between Flock CamerasAnd other tools which might aid law enforcementYour primary argument boils down toCops are corruptDo not give them any more toolsCorrect me I am wrongI do not think this argument is fundamentally sustainable
>>541907613>from google AI>he can't speak in his own words
>>541909952My first post was my understanding that cameras like these have purpose in certain locations so your assumption that I’m just against it all is flawed as it stands just as your assumption that these won’t be used to harass law abiding citizens who publicly express disdain towards the system is flawed. You do not gain rights back after they have been lost you just lose the rights and the government weathers the bitching until those legitimate grievances are replaced by other legitimate grievances
>>541910060Why don't you just answer the question? Would you be comfortable with a camera surgically grafted into your forehead?
>>541907015they could be fun if they were used to hunt down non white.
>>541910095As I stated beforeGoogle AI is smarter and better informed than both you and IWhat is the point of pretensions here?
>>541907015kill yourself
>>541907015>Flock = Security FOR JEWSThis kind of things only benefit the rich, you will probably use It to hunt minorities and specialy to track Antisemites, that Is why /pol/ Is against it
>>541910128I am not about to answer childish questions
>>541910164What are google AIs biases and who owns those biases?
>>541910004>maybe we can spin this into holding bad people accountablewhat a grand and intoxicating innocence
>>541910190Because you're a pussy first and a retard second. Criminals = cameras good, right? So why not a camera for everyone? Follow your own goddamn logic.
>>541910111Alright. If you are not blanket anti Flock then I have no issues with your position
>>541907015I'm indifferent to it. The issue is that everybody carries a phone, that they voted to put cameras and kill switches into cars already.That they all have ring cameras.This is a silly time waster.
>>541910190It’s not a childish question, if you are for mass surveillance to stop criminality that you should be for everyone having cameras and tracking chips to be placed upon their person to make sure that everyone is law abiding
Holy shit they are relentless, take a vacation bro.>One of the symptoms of approaching nervous breakdown is the belief that one's work is terribly important - Bernard Russel
>the twitter tranny once again makes his 1pbtid flock bait thread>/pol/ once again obliges him with a guaranteed 300 replies You niggers are the dumbest faggots imaginable.
>>541907015I'm pro Flock of Seagulls
>>541909460>it is a FACTLOL
>>541910272Alright. This is the last step I take in this rabbit hole. I am not entertaining this infantile argument any furtherHere it isPlacing tracking chips inside your body WITHOUT your consentis an ACTUAL violation of the 4th Amendment"Not the contrived one invented in 1967That is all I have to say on the matter
>>541910290These threads are created by the machine to judge its own acceptance. It needs our data to learn how to be. Best way to obtain that data is to observe the human organism in its most natural state. In conjunction with the government apparatus it's a coming hell world.
>>541910369Give us your actual opinion not some robot read out. You are human aren't you? Recipe for muffins maybe?
>>541910343From Google AITracking Vehicles: The cameras take still photos of passing cars and read license plates. Police search this database to find suspect vehicles in violent crimes, thefts, and kidnappingsSolving Cases: Data from the company shows the system supports roughly one million investigations a year. Police in various cities credit the system with helping solve homicides and catch dangerous suspects quicklyFinding Missing People: The network helps locate over 10,000 missing or endangered people every year.
>>541910411>>541910411>Give us your actual opinion not some robot read outWhat for?Are you sentimental or somethingYou have an argument against something? Elaborate it
>mass surveillance thread>jeet desperately trying to rationalize said surveillanceAt least use a meme flag or vpn you nigger, hows the government glowie payroll?
>>541910517I fed your posts to Gemini and asked what you're doing. While there isn't a single official psychological term for this exact behavior, several terms from psychology, rhetoric, and slang describe specific angles of it:Rhetorical & Psychological TermsPedant / Pedantic: A person who is overly concerned with minor details, formal rules, and literal facts, often ignoring the human context, personal values, or bigger picture of a conversation.Technocrat: In a debate context, this refers to someone who treats every issue purely as a cold, data-driven math problem while completely ignoring the human elements, values, or personal perspectives involved.Proof-Surfing / Cherry-Picking: Throwing out stats without revealing a personal stance is often a tactic called "cherry-picking"—selecting only data points that support a specific outcome while pretending to remain neutral.Intellectualizing: A psychological defense mechanism where someone uses cold facts, logic, and data to completely avoid dealing with emotions, personal beliefs, or genuine human connection.Slang & Informal TermsFact-Checking / Stat-Dumping: A person who "stat-dumps" throws overwhelming amounts of data at you to shut down a debate rather than having an honest back-and-forth about how they actually feel or what they believe.Playing Devil's Advocate: If they are bringing up stats for a point of view they don't even agree with just for the sake of arguing, they are playing devil's advocate.Sealioning: A debate tactic where someone pretends to be purely objective and just "asking for evidence" or "presenting data," but does so in bad faith to exhaust the other person without ever revealing their true stance.
>>541910369If you consider everyone a suspect you destroy civic trust and your society rots, and that damage is far worse than whatever the criminals can do, that's all i'll say to you as well.
>>541910473>From Google AI (LLM)
>>541910604ok>Sealioningreally?
>>541910639You have better arguments or sources?Do provide it
>>541910111Except when the government does change policy and "gives you more rights". The progressive has defacto given criminals the right to smoke meth in public. Often times progressives refuse to take away the rights of criminals abusing them. I believe the anti-flock business is more of the same. They have been in operation for nine years without anyone making databases or trying to create a social credit system. The police get a lot of calls as a natural result of flooding the country with illegals and sanctuary states trying to handle niggers with kid gloves. If the surveillance existed it could result in plenty of these being incarcerated which could result in consituencies chimping out.The average DNC voter with their sloganeering don't see anything wrong with a little bit of burglary, petty theft, and vandalism. To them the penal code is this insufferable and unfair yoke they can't possibly carry. Incarceration hardly breaks them of this mindset and anything the justice system does is injust in their minds.But, they can dissimulate that the cops are going to track and monitor people for no reason or unjustifiable reasons. If the cops had that kind of time we wouldn't need cameras.
>>541910651The robot hath spoken. It is your god. It has unredeemed you.
>>541908923Yes, that's exactly what I meant.
>>541910060good post.I think a major part of the problem, is how we deal with cops that act in bad faith. A local cop routinely uses flock system to track a girl they like that doesn't like them back, or an ex wife, or like that. There needs to be a PUBLIC example made out of them. I'm not talking about that cop-nanny bullshit, either. A week off without pay, wow, how will they live through their punishment. I'm talking prosecuted after being fired and stripped of their free cop lawyers. The people responsible for "law and order" need to demonstrate that procedure.>The public has lost faith in police. There's little tiny girl cops you know are useless in a real situation and will shoot the innocent bystanders on a bad scene. The big strong men? Will taser grandma's and drag them out of cars for burned out tail lights. Go fucking figure the poublic has *ZERO* confidence that the whole flock system won't be misused.>What's the difference between a flock camera and a gun?Not much. Both are valuable tools. Both can be used improperly.
>>541907015Kill all jews and niggers
>>541907191Most stolen cars are never recovered
>>541910813>What's the difference between a flock camera and a gun?>Not much. Both are valuable tools. Both can be used improperly.Exactly
>>541907015all the brown haired whites will do whatever the jews tell them, they always do. they look white enough but mentally are nothing but a nigger slave doing what daddy neanderkike says to do.blonde haired whites are gonna save you like we always do, you dumb little niggers
>>541907154>>541907613you eat feces, literally no one cares about your opinions or thoughts
>>541910813>>541910884We have no reason to trust whatever you are saying, you both look very suspicious. You like that? Get used to it either way, you voted for it.
>>541910318>I'm pro Flock of Seagulls"They ran... niggers ran so far away couldn't get away(drum solo)"
>>541910813What a lot of people don't realize is cops are constantly arresting cops. Sometimes they do get out of control when they've formed police gangs that know how to duck IA and there can be much more grievous examples when judges or prosecutors get in on the conspiracy but for the vast majority the badge gets them someone in their department not field sobriety testing them when they get caught in a DUI checkpoint or some other regular person crime. Cops have been caught abusing the flock system and have been removed from the force and prosecuted. This is because there are already systems in place to catch abuses of power because if the police don't self police the people can make a big stink over it and some politician can run on completely reforming the police department. An AG can invite the feds in. Then you have a situation where Sherriff's are going to federal prison and the department losing public trust that could have been prevented if the bad apples were rooted out sooner.
>>5419070151pbtid shill thread
>>541907015It's fine for nigger infested ghettos.
>>541910715>The progressive has defacto given criminals the right to smoke meth in public....is that really your evidence for the assertion that government occasionally gives back rights? That they neglect to enforce drug laws?That's not even the reason for that specific phenomena, even putting aside that doing drugs is a pretty shit "right." They don't enforce against methheads and other druggies because enforcement against them is difficult and resource-consuming due to the total lack of cooperation from the methhead. It's anarcho-tyranny; they will neglect to enforce against anyone who makes it difficult and gleefully over-enforce against the compliant, such as middle class White people. Nobody in government said to give people back a right for drugs, they just decided druggies aren't profitable enough to prosecute.Moreover, you're giving the exact reason why the Flock/ALPR/Axion/etc cameras can't possibly be on the track for being used for good. Government will simply ignore those it's already choosing to ignore, like the 100 million illegal immigrants or the druggies or the race rioters or whoever, the people you'd want the cameras for. It will only use the cameras against those who will show up to a court date, i.e. Joe Plumber who used to wear a MAGA hat. Also,>But, they can dissimulate that the cops are going to track and monitor people for no reason or unjustifiable reasons.THIS HAS ALREADY HAPPENED:https://www.bostonglobe.com/2026/09/02/metro/revere-police-flock-cameras-girlfriend/https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/wisconsin-cops-used-flock-over-151519589.html?guccounter=1https://www.foxnews.com/us/ex-indiana-deputy-charged-felony-allegedly-using-flock-cameras-stalk-girlfriendhttps://abcnews.com/US/officer-allegedly-flock-license-plate-cameras-track-boyfriends/story?id=135418955NOT A THEORY, ALREADY HAPPENED, A LOT. These are just the first 4 articles I found, there's dozens more.Quit being a dumbass boomer.
Catching criminals is not a problem, it's the judges that are letting them go that are the problem. All those retards on the news have like 30 arrests. Police is doing just fine without flock. Look at El Salvador.
>>541911291Why are you shifting the goalpost on cops instead of the abuses by the regimes in power? We haven't lost faith in cops but in the state, it's weak, afraid, paranoid and believe that if citizens feel constantly watched and guilty, they are far less likely to organize, protest and challenge the ruling power, just the usual Stasis and KGB shit.
>>541907613Shut the hell up streetshitter
If you want to solve these problems. Go after data brokers...
>>541910171Flock is for the goyim, the chosen ones don't need it.
>>541907015Again? Never was. I'll be pro flock when they remove them from our streets and install them in the homes and offices of all public officials and the corporate stooges who are running companies on the government's behalf using black budget money
>>541907154The constitution needs to be abolished. the fourth is a hindrance to fighting crime.
>>541907015When did feds get so funny at shilling, brigading and shitposting?
>>541910715Ghetto culture is cultivated and protected by the state to allow for people like you to be fine with mass surveillance states and an increased police presence. You’re willingness to break this down to “red team good blue team bad” is helping the situation they are creating not hindering it
>>541912020>The constitution needs to be abolished. the fourth is a hindrance to fighting crime.This sounds like something an Epstein Class member would say.Why do you hate America and why do you hate our 4th amendment rights for, comrade?And how's the weather in Tel Aviv?
>>541907015i'm getting really tired of seeing your faggy anime pfp in your twitter screencap posts every day
>>541911766No, fuck your nationless mob of animals calling for revolution.Besides, the threat isn't revolution. It's trannies on duscord plotting terrorist attacks and lone gunmen trying to assassinate the president. The left will never behave. It's obvious what any post revolution government needs to do about that in order to usher in their dictatorship and they have and will.
>>541907015>anonymous people are against the death of anonymity>badWhere do you think you are?
>>541907015I will not be pro flock, eat shit MIGA.
>>541907015>What would it take for you to be Pro-Flock again?I was never pro-flock to begin with you fucking nigger kike.
>>541907015What would it take for you to be Pro-Flock again?Make the data they collect on politicians and anyone they associate with by any means and in any capacity public domain and freely searchable.
>>541907015All israelis deserve to be burnt to death on camera while the world sings joyously in harmony.
>>541907015Honestly the only reason people hate the surviellance state is becuase it will make it harder for them to rebel/revolt against the system.If you protest against the system they will track you down.the fault in their reason lies in the fact that they want to rebel on their own terms when rebellion is really just a response to an overly oppressive regime (with ALOT of glowie/3rd party help)If they really hated the big brother system theyd be burning down corporate offices,factories and the homes of corporate ceos.
>>541911291Well, I wouldn't say "constantly". Cops are looking to arrest other cops as a last resort. And while what you went on to describe is all true and real, its not 1% as "vigorous" as you make it sound.>the actual real world results are this... the system does not like to hear about dirty cops or cops bending rules. If they can plug their ears and say "na na na" until the problem goes away (out of the news cycle) they will do that every time they can. though the public thinks otherwise, the public likes it better when its ignored, too. They feel better thinking it doesn't happen or almost never happens.>the net result of this "system" is complete chaos, and every cop knows that in reality its "Pirates of the Caribbbean RUles" that actually matter. IE, the law? Fuck that puppy shit. The only law is what a man can do, and what he can't. Well, that's the COP'S LAW. For ordinary citizens? Quite a different experience.>If you have never hd a chance to make a cop squirm or get scared before, I suggest you do it carefully. But it is VERY enjoyable and highly satisfying to see the big bad uniformed street hero? Illusion shattered, they're scared and acting out and pouting like a little kid.
>>541912089>When did feds get so funny at shilling, brigading and shitposting?sounds like they hired australianskek
>>541913017>If they really hated the big brother system theyd be burning down corporate offices,factories and the homes of corporate ceos.I ran this through google translate, into english..."don't attack me for fucking you over, instead here's a list of other people you should go get them"
>>541907015>What would it take for you to be Pro-Flock again?TKD
Identifying jews and nonwhites with AI and flock cameras so they can be sent to concentration camps.
>>541907015Male the police trustworthy again.
I accept your concession.
>>541908332>2004 is recent
>>541907015Cop misuses the collected data: automatic death penalty for the copCompany has a data leak: everyone at the company receives the death penalty, even the janitorA data error leads to someone being inconvenienced in any way due to that error: death penalty for everyone at the company, even the janitorThose are my three requirements to not completely oppose Flock and Flock like systems.
>>541913613Ahh yes, that last bastion of cope and seethe. The lense of projection.Gotta build me up like a strawman just so you feel some sense of superioritySad really
>>541914027Im pretty on board with this. I was thinking about the 'harddrive failure' or whatever bullshit excuse they gave for the Epstein missing footage the other day, and how footage getting corrupted for high profile cases should automatically be treated as tampering with evidence. There needs to be serious incentive to make sure shit like that never, ever happens because otherwise we get bullshit like what we have now.IF ALL IT TAKES TO HIDE EVIDENCE OF THE ELITES DOING ILLEGAL AND EVIL SHIT IS TO CLAIM "technical error" THEN THEY WILL AND DO EXPLOIT IT. The death penalty woupd be great incentive to making sure footage never goes missing ever again.
MAGA stands with Flock. /pol/ is a MAGA TRUMP BOARD. If you're a leftist shill crying about Flock it's about time you leave and go back to your tranny discord or redbit.You lost, tranniesinb4>miggerback to rebbit troon
>>541912504You should take a look into who this person is:https://youtu.be/1GCb3koY7SUWhat he is involved with. Because he says some interesting things.
>>541907015I support them now simply because desantis is against them
>>541911820>The rich dont have cameras surveiling themPrecisely my point
>>541907015When every government is becoming increasingly british (see jewish) it's surveillance not for my benefit like arresting niggers and shit committing crimes but arresting white people for going 3 over the speed limit or trying to prevent their daughter from being raped by niggers.A trustworthy government that actively had it's citizens interests in mind few would be against the cameras, unfortunately no western nation (previously known as white nations) have that.
>>541907724Taking pictures in public isn't a search or a seizure. We just need legislation that limits long term storage of the resulting data. Because over time a profile on a specific plate becomes the equivalent of a car having a GPS tracker on it, which would require a warrant.
