It's because they think of the popular girl in class.It's the same reason why people throughout history supported mutilation. Be it circumcision or clitorectomies, footbinding, or some other weird african tribal stuff.If you research it - there had always been people who tried to make systemic mutilation illegal. Say: in china multiple emperors wanted to make footbinding illegal (they crippled every second girl at it's peak - a proper crippling).When we sent christian missionaries over there to end footbinding, it was MOTHERS and WOMEN who resisted ending footbinding.Why? It's because you underestimate how many resentful losers there are in the world. These people think about the popular girl or the popular boy in classroom - and then they consider that fun. They don't care that they themselves were mutilated. Because they know that if everyone is equally mutilated - not everyone is equal.And women here support islam for the same reason. Ok, there's mothers who have transitioned two of their boys from male to female... and they support islam and pretend it is non-binary. They must be fully aware how much damage Islamisation will cause to their boys/girls.You must look at these people as resentful losers who support stuff like that while thinking about the popular girl from class.And thus you cannot argue with them. Because it's jealous, resentful losers.
Women are genuinely retarded. It's that simple. They can't see brownoids as oppressive violent rapists because that's "racism" so the conclusion they come to is that Islam is just "misunderstood by white society"
>>541907656No, because women today are very feminist. Yet if you do some research you will easily find that women in foreign countries supported women as a whole being mutilated.Like: Properly crippled. As in: lifelong disability. (chinese footbinding). Women supported this.And today women get furious if the pink razor costs 0.11$ more than the blue razor.Then why would these harpyies have supported crippling women? Again: because they think of the popular girl in class.This sorta thinking is likely foreign to you, but it is real.And men do the same. That's why some men support circumcision. They know that if everyone is equally mutilated, not everyone is equal.And they support shitty systems which make everyone suffer, because they know that if everyone suffers equally, not everyone is equal.And if you aren't naturally like this, you likely can't comprehend this mentality. But it's real.
Women are desperate for tight-knit in-group. Much of the west is destroyed, people are isolated and families are small. There’s a better network in islamic relationships and thus many women transition.
>>541907555she probably has a gnarly bush
>>541907555Waste of fucking digits.There's room in Islam for misandry, Islam provides a safe space for hypergamy while being relatively anti rape.And beyond polygamy, where a husband is stuck needing to provide financial care, Islam is pretty restrictive of male sexuality too without outlawing it completely.This cope about resentful losers is pathetically wrong.Male sexuality is frankly pretty fucking predatory and most women want refuge from it.Also, it's ridiculously difficult for women to be sexually attracted to men in general, yet men are porn brained as fuck
>>541907882Whatve you got against women being mutilated?No seriously, explain why men get to feel morally indignant about it.Men whine here about circumcision because they think they somehow lost some sensitivity and are missing out on some capability of physical pleasure (if only this were true)
>>541907555cause they have the right gut feeling... jews hate muslims so i support muslims, easy maths
>>541907555Literally just because it's trendy, that's it, that's the whole reason. They quickly come to regret it and most end up leaving if they're not trapped in some paki family that uses them as a slave.
>>541907555I don't think women do "support Islam" in the way you're saying. If you're trying to obliquely attack support for Palestinians as support for Islam... first, that's dishonest, but second, it's also retarded. It's a higher principle than supporting Islam or immigrants or Palestine or whatever. It's about supporting human rights. If Muslims are human beings, then they have basic human rights. So much of identitarian politics is about carving out exceptions for humanity based on identitarian minutiae such that the identitarian grug can make his tribe do better than the other tribe.
>>541907656It's not fair to compare the merits (or demerits) of Islam, based on shitskin behavior.Shitskin behavior will remain regardless of what religion they have.And no, I've met western women.They have met Muslim women who are genuine Muslims. So in their mind, evil people are non Muslim men and Muslim men. But since Muslim women exist, Islam as a whole cannot be the enemy. That's as simple as it is
>A scorpion needed to cross a river but could not swim. It asked a frog to carry it across on its back.The frog hesitated. “How do I know you won’t sting me?”“That would be foolish,” said the scorpion: "If I sting you in the middle of the river, we both drown. I cannot swim." >The argument seemed sound, so the frog agreed. The scorpion climbed on, and they set out. Halfway across, the frog felt a sharp sting. Poison spread through its body. "Why?" the frog cried. "Now we will both die!" >"I couldn’t help it," said the scorpion as they sank. "It’s my nature."It's this. This is a russian fable telling you that some people will seek to cause you harm, even if it's against your own self-interest !!!Most people cannot comprehend that such people exist for real.
>>541908233The irony is, even if some paki family enslaved them, and they break free later on, there is almost no case of the woman leaving Islam.That's the part you retards haven't understood in the decades of the cold war.Women of all race and religion have a bone to pick with ALL men.Nobody sees Islam as exclusively for men
>>541908280What even was the point of this story? How was it relevant? Why do you feel the need to use a memeflag when talking about women anyways? Where are you from?
>>541908233Also>TrendyWhat kind of schizophrenia is this? Such a ridiculous cope. Cant even understand what this cope is supposed to be for even
>>541907555The same reason the men do - they will side with the perceived future consquerors to spare themselves punishment later on. The fact that these people believe islam can "win" anything on its own is what's cause for concern.
>>541908109>yet men are porn brained as fuckThe japanese have porn brain.They used to have small sized harems and Japanese Buddhists used to fuck boys and marry women. (officially, japanese buddhists wrote manuals on how to prepare a male teenagers anus to have a train ran on him... many of these teenagers later became high ranking administrators. They were pederasts like the greek)Yet they are also a demographic of high IQ men, low rates of STDs, polite, first country in asia to industrialize despite stuck on an island with few resources, silent, stoic. Ruled by warrior nobility.
>>541907555
>>541908245Women judge Islam based on what Muslim women have to say.Women almost never judge any religion or ideaology based on the actions of what their male adherents do.And guess what? There are enough Muslim women who are genuine about being pro Islam, so western women are also ok with Islam
>>541908109>yet men are porn brained as fuckBeing porn brained is white and japanese.It also used to be greek and to a slightly lesser extend roman.It's the result of a warrior culture. Be it the greek - or vikings or samurai.
>>541908436Wow so cool, a nation of high IQ prostitutes. Two weren't enough.
>>541908436The japanese are some of the least porn brained people on the planet relatively.Just because they have a mafia who overproduced their way into bankrupting their porn industry because they had an army of women indebted to them, doesn't mean the average jap is actually porn brained.It's indians who are the most pornbrained in earth. White men and niggers aren't very far off.In fact, most men today are pornbrained asf because of the internet.But then again, your argument itself is worthless.Pornbrained doesn't mean you can't have any redeeming qualities. Let's assume Japs are as pornbrained as you make them out to be.>low rates of STDs, polite, first country in asia to industrialize despite stuck on an island with few resources, silent, stoic. Ruled by warrior nobilityWow, lots of reddit tier sucking off the japanese >Ruled by warrior nobility>Faggot thinks samurais still exist Yeah, lol. But let's say all that is true. So just WHY is any woman, Japanese or otherwise, supposed to give a fuck, if you're gonna be porn brained?
>>541908508>It's the result of a warrior culture. Be it the greek - or vikings or samurai.And i know islam is constantly at war, but it was never as good at warfare as these other ones. Like: when muslims go to war, it does not look like a greek phalanx.The vikings loved war so much, their idea of the after-life was valhalla. A never ending battlefield. Your reward for dying in battle was more battle in the after-life.
>>541908508Holy fuck you're defending being porn brained.No fucking wonder you're using a memeflag.Being pornbrained is pure unadulterated JEETism.And any and all every other culture that is pornbrained, is just being spiritually jeets.And westerners aren't as pornbrained because they luckily had christian influence, although that's dying out
>>541908697Warriors hate coomers.Having multiple wives doesn't make you a coomer.Being a coomer is the opposite of being a patriarch with a healthy and living sexual appetite and appreciation for wives.You're so subhuman that you have the soul of a pajeet. This is why you don't get it
>>541908667>Wow, lots of reddit tier sucking off the japaneseOk. Compared to most islamic countries isn't it simply true?>>541908735>And westerners aren't as pornbrained because they luckily had christian influence, although that's dying outMost cathedrals were built while Christians had concubines. Until 1550 Christian clergy used to have concubines. They banged multiple women (it was semi-official. It was against the official rules, but everyone knew they did).Some of the most impressive architecture whites built happened while they still had harems like the Japanese.
>>541908833Having harems and concubines and "other women" with affairs doesn't make you pornbrained.The vast majority of women in the world are disgusted at the idea of oral sex, wether its a blow job or cunnilingus, forget anal sex. And yet in modern world, most men expect oral and anal to be basic expectations for sex.Having concubines and mistresses and harems, are only tolerated by women when society is modest and conservative
>>541908330>>541908398Come to Dewsbury
>>541908480>Women judge Islam based on what Muslim women have to say.I'm not sure this is necessarily true... do you have any evidence to substantiate this claim, or is this kinda just something you choose to believe as a fact?
>>541908830>Warriors hate coomers.Yeah, are we pretending it's a coincidence that the descendants of the vikings and samurai are hyper-sexual spergs or that the Greek and romans weren't perverted? Zeus turned into multiple animals to rape or even be fucked while in animal form by other men.That was the official god of gods of the greeks. The romans had perverted myths and gods too (not as much as the greek, but they sure had them. Think about the love goddess Aphrodite and her naked son cupid)Warriors and successful empires were rather kinky.
>>541907882They supported it because men wanted it and it gave more prestige to their daughters
>>541909044He's having an izzat attack, little rice muncher's losing his mind.
>>541909047We all know that Habibi would never get on all fours in public pretending to be a cat or dog.That's behavior which is fairly unique to white and japanese people.And thus you know it isn't just the men who have porn brain. You can tell their women are different too. This is something you see in warrior cultures. (vikings, samurai, greek, romans)
>>541909047Just sounds like they used war as an excuse for rape. There’s something appealing about just rolling into a town and taking the women you want.
>>541909144>excuseI should just say, these were men living the life of peak masculinity. Competitive games and poon rewards.
>>541909101And it's something which proper Christian women won't do either.You can tell that this white woman on all fours isn't acting like a Christian. Yet you can instantly recognize it as white behavior. If you were to remove all Christian influence from white people, you would still recognize this as "white".And thus you can deduce that this is core white. Native white. That is what whites used to be like ere Christianity arrived, and it's still within us to this day.PS: the talking animal in the bible isn't a wolf, it's a snake. Christianity itself is fairly middle eastern. Well, it emerged out of the middle east. (what an amazing place that is, the middle east, no?)
>>541909144>Just sounds like they used war as an excuse for rape.Yeah.The vikings were rapists and slave owners. 10-25% of their population was slaves, a decent chunk of that women who were freely used sexually.And today it's a bunch of spergs with porn brain.Christianity kinda tamed them - which isn't entirely bad. But it went way too far.Today we let women vote for a civil war and bitch that the pink razor costs 0.11$ more than the blue razor. And we let them lower the fertility rate below replacement and (...)PS: Christians killed women who were known to be unpleasant towards children (that was the reputation of witches, think Hansel and Gretel).
>>541909039Who or what is a Dewsbury?>>541909044Anecdotal evidence based on my interactions with western women when I lived in Australia for my degree
>>541909585>Anecdotal evidenceOkay, so total bullshit kek
The vikings killed women who refused to be abducted and raped (frequently gang-raped).Christians burned women in public who were too unpleasant towards children. ...Meanwhile Muslims killed women for being adulterous or showing too much hair.You can see that this lead to different demographics over time.Like: you will not find any middle eastern woman getting on all fours in public pretending to be a sexy animal. That is uniquely white and japanese.
>>541909101You've got such a superficial and straight up dogshit understanding of sociology and culture over generations that it's hilarious.Before ww2, furries would've been lynched among whites. Whites today are influenced by kikes. Whites of even 50 years ago are a complete alien species
>>541907555It's mostly Japan style feminism where the woman has a clearly defined role in the household and isn't disparaged for not working a day job.
>>541909607It's only bullshit if my opposition had anything even remotely more substantial.Do you even talk to women?
>>541909678>Before ww2, furries would've been lynched among whites.Leda and the swan was a popular painting subject by white artists.Viking shamans and druids were white people dressing up as animals.
>>541909607Little Bengali fella giving it the big one about being a ladies man lmao
>>541909678>Before ww2, furries would've been lynched among whites.Ok this drawing is fictional. But we know vikings did dress up like animals (druids, shamans). And then they sperged out. They danced, had sex and pretended magic is real.These people were basically furries.The biggest issue with furries today is that nobody told them to hit the gym.
>>541909913I'm not a womanizer. I am a literal woman.>inb4 titsThat's haram
>>541910074Mohammad was a gay jew that looked like pauly shore, how do you reconcile this
>>541909962Ok i think this right here is a more historically accurate drawing. You can also find historical engravings of vikings dressing up as animals. (again: shamans, druids)And you can totally see that they resemble furries.It's no surprise that furries are more common among whites today. We are the descendants of vikings after all.And you will not find middle eastern women getting on all fours in public pretending to be a dog or cat. That is uniquely white and japanese. (despite cats coming out of africa / middle east)
>>541910182He was neither Jewish nor gay.And what's wrong with pail shore?
Daddy issues: they rebel against the dominant West and they also get to feel the masculine discipline of Islam
>>541910182>>541910216>>541910074>>541909962>>541909913Feminist Timmys seething ITT
>>541910356>Bangladesh flag>Defending Islam>Somehow, im a feminist TimmyHang yourself, indian.
>>541907555You have swallowed the koolaid that they keep repeating for sympathy points.You have to realize no civilization survives without serving the women.When you listen to the sex negative feminists, like andrea dworkin, how piv is rape, how judging beauty is objectification etc, can you really not imagine things going in the opposite direction?Islam still serves women.Now pick the prettiest girl in my picrel.
>>541910074Wow a hijra methor, very cool.
>>541910449They live in the west and still choose to wear the burka. Seethe more feminist.
>>541910488Lol k
>>541907555They'll go where the latest thing takes them. Especially if staying where they are implies the slightest bit of danger. Radical feminists will be some of the most radical islamists you've ever seen. A woman that was screaming "My body, my choice" one week will be turning in her neighbors for blaspheming the next. It's going to be a horrific transformation and you won't be able to say, "I told you so" without being stoned to death.
>>541910543>Seethe more feminist.wha?
>>541910449>When you listen to the sex negative feminists, like andrea dworkinWell, she was sex negative. But dworkin openly supported incest, bestiality and transitioning children to the opposite sex. (it's in the last and second last chapter of her book "woman hating").Feminists are absolute degenerates pretending to be prudes.>Now pick the prettiest girl in my picrel.True!!! And it is true that islam serves women - but only some women. Not all.And resentful losers support this just like they support everyone being mutilated - they imagine YOU being mutilated right along them. And then they like it.
>>541907555>Why do women support Islam? It's probably because the woman who support islam (fewer than you think) fantasize about cutting off their mens dick and making hijabs out of it. Daddy issues and shit, stuff goes pretty deep.
>>541910282>He was neither Jewish nor gayHe was both things. And I don't hate Pauly Shore but given the way the prophet was described he looked askenazi jewish. Dogs are haram because a dog caught him getting zutted at the palace. This religion is insane dude its just a bunch of people trying to save face after the ottoman empire fell its just as dishonest and cringe as modern christianity and loaded with textbook semitic homosexuality, its all got to go
>>541910449Kek, retard. Can’t wait to bring back stoning of subhuman foids.
>>541910694>(fewer than you think)Not that many openly support it, but many sure pretend it isn't an issue.
>>541910576True. But it's not about the "current thing". It's them being resentful losers.They want a shitty society because they imagine YOU living in that society.
>>541907555The real question is, why don't more modern men support Islam
>>541908735As a Muslim, we don't claim this retard. Let's pray that she gets married to an abusive man who puts her in her place and plugs off her Internet.
>>541907555Women are just herd sheep who will always conform and groupthink, always following the consensus. It's not rocket science.
