>11 not guilty>1 guiltyAm I understanding this correctly? A single dumb chud is holding us back from deleting women's rights?
a thread died for this
it doesn't matter since its just massachusetts
why would letting a murder get away with it delete women's rights? You cant even bring justice to one foid
Another Lindsay Clansy thread died for this.
>>541933920>Women are crazy>It's not their fault tho cuz hormones>This is not mainstream factWhat do you think happens next
>>541934060>This is now*
don't forget it could also be 11 manslaughter and 1 1st degree, still the best possible outcome for defence so he doesn't to do it all again
>>541934060>What do you think happens nextWomen have more privilege and less responsibility, the trajectory they've been on since they got suffrage.
>>541934338>Women are biologically crazy and not responsible for their actions>They will get more privilege and less responsibilitylol?
>>541934769Hoe J. Simpson walking isn’t going to affect anything. Women have weaponized their collective delusions (like “forensic astrology”) and all the simps will defend them no matter what.
Yes. Apparently one juror "doesn't understand reasonable doubt" which is another way of saying that only one juror actually understands reasonable doubt
>>541934769>>541934060You will definitely do something for REAL this time. In Two Weeks after the acquittal. Bros… This goy means business.
>>541935252That’s the modern world in a nutshell isnt it? 1 normal person and 11 freaks?
>>541935460So you don't think male normies will be black pilled en masse? Doesn't precedent matter?
>>541934060> What do you think happens nextI would assume a lot of women murder their children next
>>541934060i think women get away with even more shit and have even less accountability while maintaining more Rights than men.
>>541933574I just can’t with how weak most men are. We really need to kill simps.
Either >11 Guilty and 1 NGRIThe lone person has a doubt that isn't reasonable and the others are trying to convince them to convict >11 NGRI and 1 GuiltyThe lone person is trying to convince the other 11 that there is no reasonable doubt Honestly the top scenario is the only one thay makes sense. Especially when Clancy's lawyer has come out and said that the one juror "has doubt".
>>541936923it's the bottom one, otherwise clancy's lawyer would be in support of the lone juror rather than claiming they don't understand reasonable doubt (translation: they do understand reasonable doubt, but they want to prosecute my client)
>>541933574>A single dumb chud is holding us back from deleting women's rights?Kek. You unironically think that something good like that would ever happen. No, he just delays the time until women are free to murder whoever they want.
>>541934060Hmm, let me meditate upon that question
>>541935521Pretty mich
>>541934160How do people determine it's a manslaughter when the whole of it shows planning and calculation and the murders themselves show real intent? it's not as if she killed one kid by hitting it in the head repeatedly with an object that happened to be there. She carefully and deliberately murdered three, one after the other.
>>541934769>Niggers are biologically crazy and not responsible for their actionsWhat happened next?
>>541933574>Am i understanding the current thing correctly?
>>541934060Men will not be able to ever reassert total control over women unless society itself collapses back to a preindustrial state, however if that ever happened in the west a coalition of muslims and communists would step in to fill the void first ushering in a complete hell world.This may actually be unavoidable at this point.The only hope of avoiding it is to speed run the singularity and hope AI decides humanity is worth preserving.
>>541934002subtle kek
>>541934060>What do you think happens nextPeople move on to the next flavor of the week story, she is forgotten, & nothing changes
i can't take seriously somebody called clancy because all i think about is the tom clancy videogames
>>541938044Understandable but this is more overarching I guess, even blacks have women
>>541937384It took me a min to realize the problem with this however: How is the defense and prosecution gaining access to what the jury is doing? They shouldn't have -any- information of what the jury is doing until the verdict is read. They can assume I guess, or unless a juror just flat out told the judge what was what.
>>541934106THIS IS NOW (NOW)HOW CAN I CHANGE TOMORROW IF I CAN'T CHANGE TODAY?THIS IS NOW (NOW)IF I CONTROL MYSELF, I CONTROL MY DESTINY
>11 jurors reached the same conclusion>1 juror disagrees>Am I understanding this correctly?No. You're speculating. Based off previous cases, it is the opposite.
>>541942092It's the opposite? So 1 juror reached the same conclusion and 11 disagree?
