[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


It is unreasonable to believe that the UK can hold the Falklands for much longer. The decline of the UK is steady and constant, while the abyss between NATO powers deepens. Argentina attacked the Falklands back when the alliance was much stronger, they should not and will not hesitate to do it again, now thst the UK is the sick man of the West and living standards are 3rd-world league. Trump himself offered billions of dollars in bailouts during argentinian election season to keep the Brazil and China-aligned politicians from taking the legislative, and they'd love their loyal puppet Milei to fulfill the argentinian dream of conquering those lands. There is no greater prize, and the first argentinian leader to claim the Malvinas will dominate argentinian politics for life.

In summary, to defend the islands is an ungrateful gargantuan task for no gain, and to conquer them would be the greatest feat in Argentina's history since its independence.

Argentina will reclaim the islands in the next decade. That is not a hypothesis, it is a spoiler.

The war between them is asymmetric. Argentina is hours away from the Malvinas.

I side with the UK, but
>>
does argentina even have a military anymore
>>
>>541942350
They won't win because they are strong, they will win because their opponent lacks the will to fight. They have everything to gain, the UK has nothing.
>>
>>541942433
Why are pardos so upset about our little island. Shouldn't you have beef with Portugal?
>>
>>541942232
>Incredible brown cope
>>
File: tg45g54g.webm (666 KB, 560x560)
666 KB
666 KB WEBM
>>541942232
>>541942433
>>
>>541942232
yes nigger monkey, its a matter of time with the brownization of the uk, but its too early to think about bananas. just wait 2 decades until 50%+ uk is pakistani and it will be a piece of cake.

just know that pakistan constantly looses wars against india
>>
>>541943242
I am not upset, I am team UK. But it is unrealistic to think the UK will hold on to the Falklands.

Do you think all the empoverished british outside London and all the immigrants would truly rally around a sacred calling to kick argentinians off an island that is a few hours away from Buenos Aires?
>>
>>541942232
>Las Malvinas voted for Brexit

lol. I unironically would have taken the side of the Brits but the Church of England with their “White people can’t be refugees” bullshit is infuriating.
>>
File: Argiebutthurt.jpg (166 KB, 1600x900)
166 KB JPG
>>
>>541943993
Pakis are good at war. Hence why the Saudis allied them after they scared off the latest indian invasion.
>>
>>541943566
Brit children are now under 50%, id be interested to see Brazil's stats to see which country is browner
>>
>>541943993
Pakistan undeniably won that minor “war” that took place between Pakistan and India recently, anon. They BTFO the Indian Air Force so hard Rafales stock tanked because the chink shit the Pakistanis wield looked superior in comparison.
>>
>>541943993
>Country full of border injuns
Ngmi
>>
How the war will be:

>Im Jewish
>If you attack me i will cry and the US will leave NATO.
>UK: Okay well you can have it.

>Thanks
>>
>>541944247
Indians began blaming the "software" of the jets being blackboxxed, because "indian engineers" would totally code a gundam in it and not brick the entire weapon.

I don't know where this myth of pakis losing to India in the 2025 war came from.

All military engagements were decisive paki victory. The pakis historically ruled over all the subcontinent. Their people fight like animals, moved by a religion that compels them to war and victory. Indians were moved by evil and greed, after some paki terrorists killed some male tourists and spared the women and children, thus enticing jeet rage due to love jihad.
>>
>>541942433
this isn't true at all. defending the falklands is a political shibboleth in the uk. no prime minister could survive not defending them
>>
>>541943242
>Shouldn't you have beef with Portugal?
Why would we?
>>
>>541942232
HOLY FUCK MILEI PLEASE DO IT

IT WILL BE THE GREATEST PIBE MOMENT OF ALL HISTORY

YOU SURE ARE GONNA WIN JUST DO IT FEDE
>>
>>541945127
Your prime ministers can't even reach 20% approval in times of peace. They cannot harness enthusiasm for anything, I don't seen them convincing the immigrants that they should fight for ice and sheep.

To defend the islands a second time would be an unthinkable gambit, especially because the UK would be hopelessly holding on.

If a war does break out in Europe as you forecast it will, then Argentina recovering the islands becomes a certainty.

Thatcher was the first british PM in near a century to have had no role during either world war. She had to prove herself, and thr UK was still cohesive enough to undertake a war.

Now your politicians can't be bothered. Too busy with Ukraine and keeping your whites behaving well on social media.

More brits would answer a call to attack London than to defend the Falklands.
>>
>>541944832
>>541944247
Pakistan "won" a minor scramble, and lost 3 major wars where they lost tens of thousands of soldiers and 1/3 of their territory.
I could care less for Pajeets, but give them their due.
>>
File: Fuck.jpg (72 KB, 770x600)
72 KB JPG
Unrelated to the thread but, why are brazilians such subhumans?
>>
>>541942232
Do people think the Falklands belong to Argentina just because they are close to Argentina? Is that their claim to it?
>>
>>541942232
The Argentinians can't stop Chinese fishing vessels from illegally entering and raping their Exclusive Economic Zone. How are they going to take the Falklands?
>>
>>541945547
>make thread making argentinians look good
>they are calling you a monkey within 20 replies

I remember when we won a war for you. And when we gave you money so you didn't go bankrupt before the presidential elections, all for Milei to accuse us of tempering with your "democracy".

Honestly, we should sack Buenos Aires again. You are a problem waiting to happen. You almost sold out Patagonia a hundred years ago to the Herzl's zionists, but Oswaldo Aranha had to stop you.

Brazil will tire from saving you from your own mess all the time, only to be insulted.
>>
>>541945439
bro i hate the uk government and every prime minister there has been in my lifetime, but I'm telling you, no uk government would ever surrender the falklands. your assessment of our national feeling is totally wrong in this case
>>
>>541942350
Does the uk?
>>
>>541945584
Pretty much.

I can't insult the argentinians, because Brazil did attack and take over the french and dutch colonies during the napoleonic wars (when the royal family of Portugal fled to Brazil).
>>
>>541942232
Give Falklands nuclear weapons and independence
>>
>>541945741
Odd. I must concede that you are right, then, as I am no brit.

I read a book on the original Falklands war, and then there was already a large faction that did not want a jingoistic epic showdown with Argentina.

Your people never appeared to me as patriotic or passionate, but rather hopeless and demotivated.
>>
>>541945719
Ignore the retard, thanks brazilbro. Feel free to sack buenos aires anytime though, most here won't shed a tear
>>
>>541942232
Absolutely based

We are gonna kill so many UK faggots. Modern warfare is completely different than the 80s and even then the modern UK is a shithole.

The moment I set foot in these islands I'm gonna rape and kill every single male
>>
>>541942232
Trump is supporting Argentina because Britain wouldn't help in Israel's war against Iran
>>
>>541945593
Brits cant either, they just liosensit for gibs.
>>
>>541942350
American Evangelicals will find a way to interpret the Schofield bible in a way that equates the modern state of Argentina with biblical Israel thereby justifying mililtary intervention on its behalf
Besides, the bongistanis didn't even say 'thank you'
>>
>>541942232
>ai slop news
How do I unsubscribe from the modern world?
>>
>>541942232
Holy fuck its all bots in this thread. Does no one see that label is over Brazil. Jesus Christ
>>
>>541945439

Nuclear defense. It hosts a submarine base. Meanung it would be a Trident way point. Outside of both its RAF bases. Aren't there at least two airfields spread on the islands with radar, coms, and some military. Outside of any other conspiracy which I won't get into.

Does it need arming, or deterrence. Sure the Argies could. But it would be defended. They might get there slightly quicker. Holding it, no chance.

It's mostly about its oil fields and waters and further potential into Antarctica's oilfields. Now you're talking a huge supply that is held up by nobody using it. For it to be used would need Mainland support refineries, pipelines, shipping.

Hence the conundrum
>>
File: ARCHI_1100371.jpg (86 KB, 760x469)
86 KB JPG
>>541942232
I'm ready for total war. Let's go.
>>
We have four Typhoons at Port Stanley, an Astute class submarine lurking around probably, quite sufficient to deal with the Argies before making any special efforts.

We have a press that uses defence to constantly attack the government of the day but you don't want to take it too seriously.

See what your AI thinks of course.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.