Can anyone explain why race is a social rather than genetic contruct?
>>541954841kill yourself, OP
>>541954841I have 5 hapa kids from my Chinese wife and work in construction.
>>541954941Interesting
>>541954841perhaps it is a lie that race is a social construct and jews that say this are just being assholes.
Race is a social construct. The genetic basis is for a species, and one of the criterion for a species is that it can only breed within the species. Humans can interbreed therefore we are one species. Race has no genetic meaning.
>>541955256Species is also a social construct.> The genetic basis is for a species, and one of the criterion for a species is that it can only breed within the species. Wrong.https://www.newscientist.com/article/2226602-were-beginning-to-question-the-idea-of-species-including-our-own/>Humans can interbreed therefore we are one species. That's not what OP was asking.
>>541955256no matter what words you use it won't change reality anon.
>>541954841People have genetic differences but how you classify them (race) is arbitrary. Chinese and Koreans are considered different races but you can tell by looking at them they have common genes/ancestors. We classify them by borders which are arbitrary. Han Chinese is one of the most loosely defined races, there's probably more genetic diversity within the borders of China than in most of Europe. The CCP sort of invented the Han Chinese race to erase that division so that the populace could unite behind the party/state/communism. If you spend any amount of time thinking about your own and where your ancestors come from then the construct of race becomes apparent. But I can't think for you.
>>541955563>Chinese and Koreans are considered different racesDo you mean ethnicities? They're not commonly seen as being separate races.>Han Chinese is one of the most loosely defined racesOkay you do mean ethnicities.
>>541954841I had a biological anthropology 101 professor try to tell us this line, or the way she put it was something like you could share more genetic similarity with someone from the other side of the world than someone in your own village, and that this was true even in pre-modern times with a lot less migration. But at the same time she let us kind of know this was PC bullshit and said it was how they required her to teach the material. I asked for clarification and what they're saying is basically a short fat Chinese man who happens to be the rare Chinese with blue eyes and a strange ear shape could have more DNA in common with a short fat Frenchman with black hair and blue eyes and this same unusual ear shape than the Frenchman has with the tall woman descended from Muslims and Spaniards and Algerians who lives down the road. It's technically true but it involves some disingenuous mental gymnastics.
>>541954941Nice job. A random Iranian is more related to you than any of your kids. You killed your own lineage.
>>541954841
>>541954841Because modern scientist cannot comprehend how genes related to physiognomy but also behaviour.
>>541955719
>>541955613Han Chinese is an ethnicity according to modern western science which rejects race but according to Chinese people, especially 50 years ago, it's their race.
>>541954841STFU NiggerBLM is a Terrorist organization
Why do Koreans think they're fooling people withe a face full of plastic surgery? They look like aliens.
It can't be deduced a priori therefore is hecking worthless as a concept
>>54195609050 years ago or more like 65-70 during the Gang of 4 MAO years.unrelated but Chinese aren't Communist. they're hypercapitalist but the Government rules under the theme of Communism to keep people in check.China is winning. lets face it. they're slowly building better and have more money than the westit's going to show. They don't spend trillions on research. they just steal shit with the help of people like Hilary and Bill Clinton. just letting them walk right in and taking it from American research centersTREASON AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL
>>541954841I have a theory about this.
>>541954841>social>genetic They are both the same but have different time framesSocial is short term but genetic is a longer form of "social"; to the point that it affects DNA
>>541956467If China was a neoliberal religious monarchy it doesn't change the history behind the Han Chinese classification. Why are you so stupid and brown? Do you think you're the first person to tell me "DUDE CHINA'S NOT COMMUNIST ANYMORE" or "DUDE CLINTONS BAD." Shut the fuck up and stop being brown.
