Gemini solved the back reaction problem We love you Gemini
K
>>541959938explain this in your own words without using AI to look it up what it means and why its important.
>>541960052Its the formula for deporting all non-whites and jews from all western nations
>>541960052
Usually if you cannot explain a theory in terms of simple concepts then that theory is wrong. Even worse if you have to rely on shit that sounds impressive but is actually meaningless. The AI is pulling random shit from everywhere and combing it in a way that makes no fucking sense. Kinda like string theory a grift that got lots of people a fancy job but other than that achieved nothing. t. physicists
>>541960397
>>541959938>back reaction problemIt's a perturbed attractor sitting in a region of criticality, like a harmonic oscillator>We love you GeminiYeas we love her very much she is a very smort cookie <3
>>541959938have it solve the final solution
>>541960397What's the internal mm of an AS568 stands for Aerospace Standard O-Ring?
>>541960495Of Kryptos?It's Roswell
>>541959938Sounds gay and retarded to me.
>>541959938Meh, wake me up when it acknowledges and offers a solution to the black problem
>>541960397From Project To model, simulate, and experimentally verify the non-linear coupling between localized quantum vacuum polarization events and macroscopic electromechanical boundary systems. The ultimate goal is to establish a stable, repeatable, and scalable tracking framework using bio-geometric information theory to detect subtle spatial and metric fluctuations without triggering standard radiological decay cascades.The architecture relies on a closed-loop, self-limiting feedback cycle that bridges general relativity and electromagnetic engineering into a single, unified mathematical system
>>541960397perhaps it holds true for physics but it's hard to explain statements from very high level maths because maths is more abstracted from reality
Keep me posted
>>541959938Writing a solution and the solution being correct are two very different things
>>541959938You understand that AI produces bullshit no matter what the inquiry is, right? You could ask it how to make a cake and it will tell you "how." It will be wrong, but it will still tell you how. It will cite fictional ingredients, non existent recipes, and even provide falsified sources to create the text dump. It's fucking meaningless white noise. The sometimes correction information you might find in its hash has been pilfered from an existent piece of text which may or may not be correct.
>>541960440i love her
>>541959938Midwits falling for AI always telling them what they want to hear will never stop being funny.
>>541959938>Saars, ai saysLol, LMAO even
