>>541970877The white people
Why not share it?
The one dumping their tainted beef on Amerimutts
>never really belonged to argentina>99.9% of people who live there want to be british>might is right - we literally won a war to keep it
>>541970877UK, they held it for longer than Argentina has been a country.
>>541970877I do think it's funny that Reagan cucked to Thatcher on the Monroe Doctrine and let a European Power steam an aircraft carrier into our hemisphere without so much as a sternly worded letter in response.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVd-DGMuHfM
>>541970877UK because it secures their pathway to antarctica. Islands. Argentina doesn't need it, lost it and has no reason to have it other than they think it is close. Same logic could be applied to it belonging to Chile.It would also be like Bolivia, Brazil, you are gay, or paragay claiming that lands in Argentina belong to them or any coastal regions.
>>541970976say bye bye to falklands bing bong!
>>541971016It was about the way Argentine had took it, via militarily invasion. US won't allow any country to subjugate another by invasion. This has been the world order since WW2. Thats why Ukraine's survival matters so much.
>>541970976Argentina's argument begins with the principle of uti possidetis juris: when Spanish colonies in South America became independent, the new states inherited the territorial boundaries of the former Spanish possessions.Argentina says that the Malvinas were part of the Spanish colonial possessions in the South Atlantic and therefore passed to Argentina when it became independent in 1816. Argentina subsequently exercised governmental authority over the islands.
>>541970877people there identify as british and I think they are ethnically british as well
>>541970877None. Malvinas je Srbija!
On 3 January 1833, British forces took control of the islands and expelled the Argentine authorities. Argentina characterizes this as an act of force during peacetime and says it never consented to the British takeover. Argentina also says it protested the occupation and has continued to assert its sovereignty ever since.
>>541970877England. The argentinian jew should calm down a bit
Argentina's position is that this is not a normal case of a colonized indigenous population deciding its future. Argentina argues that the present population largely descends from people who settled under British rule after the 1833 expulsion of Argentine authorities and inhabitants.Therefore, Argentina says the principle of self-determination should not override Argentina's territorial claim. Argentina points specifically to UN General Assembly Resolution 2065 (1965), which recognized the existence of a sovereignty dispute and called on Argentina and Britain to negotiate.
I guess they are giving this part to Chile soon because its closer right?
>>541970877The mightiest.Last time it was tested that was the UK.I should note that they still have nukes and Argentina does not.Probably better to wait until Britain collapses under its own and to just scavenge the islands afterwards.
NOT AGAIN!
From the Argentine point of view, the case rests on several principles together:Historical succession from Spain: Argentina inherited Spain's territorial rights.Prior Argentine administration: Argentina says it exercised governmental authority before 1833.Illegal/forcible British takeover: Britain removed Argentine authorities in 1833.Continuous protest: Argentina never accepted the British claim.UN recognition of a sovereignty dispute: The UN has repeatedly treated the issue as unresolved.Territorial integrity: Argentina argues that its territory was taken by force.Self-determination: Argentina says it does not apply in the same way because the present population developed after the British takeover.Argentina therefore describes its sovereignty claim as "legitimate" and "imprescriptible"—essentially, a right that it believes has not disappeared merely because Britain has controlled the islands for a long period.
Argentina does not noy deserve island gibs just because its next to them
>>541970877The people who live there are angloids, so angloids are in the right.
>>541970877so the falklands should be chile by that argument
>>541970877There's oil there that Israel wants. Milei doesn't want this land for the Argies he wants it because Big Boss Netty told him to get it for the Israelis.
>>541970877The highest bidder.
>>541971310Chile–Argentina territorial disputes: how they were settledBeagle Channel dispute (1978–84): Argentina and Chile nearly went to war over islands and maritime boundaries. Papal mediation led to the 1984 Treaty of Peace and Friendship, which established the boundary and gave Chile sovereignty over the disputed islands.Laguna del Desierto: Submitted to international arbitration. In 1994, the tribunal ruled largely in Argentina’s favor.Southern Patagonian Ice Field: Mostly addressed through bilateral agreements and boundary negotiations, though some technical demarcation issues remain.Bottom line: Chile and Argentina settled their major disputes through mediation, arbitration, and treaties—not war.
>>541971196the british conquered the falklands from spain long before any south american country became independent, and in any case the brits were the first ones to settle on it any way, the spanish empire contested it and lost
Ask the Falklanders?
>>541970976>might is rightSo you are not going to cry like a little bitch when drumpf kicks your bong asses off the islands?
>>541971450The islands are highly international for such a small population: the 2021 census recorded 3,662 residents, with people from 68 countries.1,898 residents (about 52%) were born outside the Falkland Islands.It is becoming increasingly common for men to marry foreign brides, i.e. Philippines.
>>541971856One single Brit heading to Greenland scared him off. He wouldn't dare.
>>541970927that's cuck behavior
>>541971685Who?
>>541971620The French established Port Louis in 1764, a year before the British settlement at Port Egmont.Spain subsequently took over the French settlement in 1767 and maintained a Spanish presence until 1811. Britain also withdrew its Port Egmont settlement in 1774, although it left a plaque asserting its claim. Argentina's claim does not depend on having been an independent country before the British first arrived. Argentina argues that, upon independence from Spain in 1816, it inherited Spain's territorial rights in the former Spanish possessions. Argentina then exercised governmental authority over the islands in the 1820s, including appointing officials and establishing a settlement. In 1833, Britain expelled the Argentine authorities from the islands. Argentina argues that this was an unlawful use of force and has maintained its sovereignty claim ever since. Britain, conversely, argues that its earlier claim remained valid and that its sovereignty has been continuous since 1833.
>>541971016We are a former English colony. Our entire culture is Anglo. Bongs get special treatment.
>>541970877Where do you think Argentina came from, roach anon?
>>541970877>Who is in the right here?Last time they asked the people living there, 99% voted UK.
>>541970976>>might is right - we literally won a war to keep itThat's a bad angle for you, as you are losing your homeland to brown people even as we speak. You should have thrown away all brown people the second that first bit of poop touched a British sidewalk. Instead you are being thrown to jail because of mean tweets.... and women and twinks allow it becasue of white guilt.How about instead of starting another foreign resource extraction project, like Sea Lion project, operating in foreign water without permission you start to make do with your own resources... and then you can stop feeling guilty for being "le racist"
>>541970877Didn't the majority of people living on the islands say they want to be part of the UK?
>>541970976> crimea is russian
>>541971685Where were these guys when all the English girls were being sex trafficked by South Asian men? The Island issue distracts them both. The British want to hold on to the island as a last refuge for when the UK collapses, but due to foreign brides many of the kids there now look darker than Agentinians. Maybe the British should focus on their own problems in their own continent, and not those thousands of miles away.
Something profoundly kino about the British army in the 80s. We also were very close to joining the war due to the Dutch 1st Marine Combat Group integration with 3 Commando Brigade until the standdown order.People talk shit about the UK armed forces but it's still more than decent and at the top of the world as an expeditionary force and supply their own intel. There are only 4 or 5 armed forces that can do what the British can do and I certainly expect them to successfully defend the Falklands again if it would come to that.
>>541970877>Who is in the right here?whoever has the might
>>541971856That would be great, as it would unleash hell on all American interests around the globe. Every landlord, pornographer, money lender and diamond wholesaler would be hit hard. It won't happen, though.
>>541972826Yes, and they shall remain so.
>>541971196>uti possidetis jurisI will see your Latin phrase and raise you this Greek phrase>molon labe
>>541972937it literally is
>>541972289Didn't used to. Not in 1812. Not during War Plan Red. Only very recently in the ultra cucked new world order. Certainly not before Truman. Lincoln even let the Fenian Raids happen.
>>541972404This would make it right then
>>541977717There is no logical consistency to this argument. France has a stronger claim than Argentina or Spain.
>>541972763>That's a bad angle for you, as you are losing your homeland to brown people even as we speak.by guile, not by force.
>>541977849France transferred its East Falkland settlement to Spain. Spain paid France for the settlement
France recognizes that there is a dispute.France supports negotiations between Argentina and the UK as the way to resolve it.Spain supports Argentina.
>>541977963You are a confused Meximutt that feels allegiance to Spain, I get it. The thing is, the Falklands were uninhabited prior to European contact. Several colonial powers of the era competed for it and Britain came out on top, as it often did. You are now crying about it in 2026. Many such cases. Get over it.
>>541978259Those weren't my opinions, you can look it up.
On August 31, 2026, President Trump said he was reviewing the U.S. position on the Falklands. France — supports negotiationsSpain has historically gone further than France. Its position has been that the dispute should be resolved through negotiations, and historically Spanish officials have supported a settlement that would result in Argentine sovereignty.China is quite explicit. Beijing has repeatedly backed Argentina's claim to the Malvinas and supported a negotiated settlement. In 2022, China reiterated its support for Argentina's sovereignty claim.
>>541978259Indigenous people and the FalklandsIndigenous peoples such as the Yagán and Kawésqar of Tierra del Fuego were highly skilled canoe travelers, fishermen, and maritime hunters.The Falkland Islands (Malvinas) are about 400–500 km from Tierra del Fuego, so reaching them by canoe was difficult but potentially possible for experienced maritime peoples.Archaeological research has found stone tools/projectile points, charcoal, and animal remains that some researchers interpret as evidence of human visits before European arrival.There is no conclusive evidence of a permanent Indigenous settlement in the Falklands.Therefore, saying the islands were simply “definitely uninhabited before Europeans” is too absolute. The evidence for pre-European visits is debated, but credible archaeological evidence exists.
The UK has many small islands that are currently uninhabited.Examples include:St Kilda's islands — Scotland; the main island, Hirta, was evacuated in 1930, though it now has a small seasonal/working population.Flannan Isles — Scotland; uninhabited since the lighthouse was automated in 1971.North Rona — Scotland; permanently uninhabited since the 19th century.Sula Sgeir — Scotland; no permanent population.Isles of Scilly — England; several of the smaller islands are uninhabited.Islands around the Outer Hebrides and Orkney — numerous small islands have no permanent residents.So an island being uninhabited today doesn't mean it was always uninhabited. Some UK islands were inhabited historically and later abandoned, while others appear to have had little or no permanent settlement.This distinction is relevant when comparing the Falklands: “no permanent inhabitants” and “never visited or occupied by Indigenous people” are two different claims.
>>541979373That's a long way of saying the islands were uninhabited.Thanks, ChatGPT!
