What are the political implications of this?
>>542017733Why is this news? Who thought it did?
>>542017733TOTALKIKEVICTORY
>>542018491Probably leftists. They’re retarded and think things like food, shelter, healthcare are human rights and don’t think deeper than “nice thing? Why can’t have nice thing? It would be so nice if we can have nice thing!”. They don’t understand the difference between privileges and natural rights, hence their lack of gratitude or appreciation for the sacrifices of men for civilization, which they actively participate in destroying.
>>542017733>B-but mr whiteman, why won't you clean our water!? >We hate you and claim the world would be a better place without you, but we need dat clean dranking water only you can provide!!
>>542017733For the last time:Rights are things that can't be taken away, not guaranteed free shit
>>542018601>Probably leftists. They’re retarded and think things like food, shelter, healthcare are human rights and don’t think deeper than “nice thing? Why can’t have nice thing? It would be so nice if we can have nice thing!”. They don’t understand the difference between privileges and natural rights,This. Screencap relevant example of another "right".Also, anything government controls (public water for example) is ruined by the politicians and DEI hires.
Why would the constitution cover the right to clean water?
>>542018641Isn't this about nestle etc. harvesting sources of natural water and selling it for a premium. Or was that already ok and this is about datacenters?Water should be close to free, if you are serious you are a good goy.
>>542018491niggers, jews, trannies and simps
Because the constitution is a very clearly defined set of rules that the government must obey by. Leftists have a poor understanding of this because they only see the world as how they feel it should be, not how it actually is.
>>542017733leftists will never understand the difference between a right to do these things for yourself, and the entitlement to demand these things be done for you by someone else, free of cost to you.
>>542018601This.
>>542018815By implication that it would make poisoning water wildly illegal which is does not.
>>542017733The political implications of this is the economy is the only thing that matters and datacenters need that water sorry goy.
>>542019022It is wildly illegal to poison water supplies. How illegal it actually is depends on the how and why.>Government fuckup leading to poisoned waterNot illegal. Civilly liable for damages>Corporation cutting corners and polluting a waterwayIllegal and civilly liable for damages results in fees and lawsuits>Bad actor intentionally poisoning water in attempt to poison peopleAct of terrorism. Prison sentences, restitution.
>michigan water cyber attacks>mfw noticing the water is starting to taste funkyanybody else drink water out of the fridge tap? have you noticed any difference?
