What did he do wrong?>nothingThen why'd he lose?
>>542024416Jozef Pilsudski died a few years to soon
We were outnumbered pretty badly and then there was also lend-lease on top of that
>>542024505No one beats Canada.
>>542024505this /thread also bad decisions that if you were in the scenario probably seemed like good decisions. also i think the enigma code being cracked is important too. but realistically with cryptography you should assume every message will be decrypted but yeah when it happens alot faster can have problems
He killed innocent Jews against the will of G-d you fucking retard.
He lost because he kept pressing his luck and bet on the other powers just giving in. Of course they wer eventually going to push back.
People say that he made the mistake of attacking Russia too soon. But he honestly had no choice. The Bolsheviks was controlled by jews and Hitler knew this. Hitler knew that it was jews that got America to enter the war.Knowing all of this, he had to do a preemptive strike to Russia in order to give him the edge from being attacked in multiple directions.
He did nothing wrong.
he trusted Italy to actually do something, he waited too long to invade russia, he thought the brits would cave, among other things
>>542024416He wasn’t smart enough tactically to maneuver and win wars, unlike some real efficient warlords such as Napoleon, Genghis, Alexander, cyrus, caesar, mohammed etc
It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not weakness. That is life.
>>542024416>What did he do wrong?completely failed to understand trve arya and didn’t eradicate desert religions from evropa
>>542024600dis nigga can't spell "were"
>>542024962Its 'We're" you ellitirate fuck
>>542024416steiner didn't attack
>>542024416>Then why'd he lose?The guys who were wrong were more
>>542024416> Then why'd he lose?Traitors and betrayal Russia was about to starve and fall until the anglokike came along
>>542024416He tried knowing he might not succeed. He tried his best. That's always a good thing.
>>542024416Sometimes even if you lose the fight, standing up to fight is still the right thing
>>542024416>no Holocaust>didn't destroy the Brits when he had the chance>tried to zerg Moscow instead of just cutting it off and watching the Bolshekikes implode>allying with the nips when they were on a collision course with the US anyway (completely unnecessary)Those are the big ones. If he did even one of these things actually, he might have won. Two and he for sure would have won.
>>542025136Its very conveneint to "try" with other people's hands (and lives) and then once you failed just fuck off to South America.
>>542024416He did one thing wrong. He was too nice. Instead of letting Brits go at Dunkirk, he should have slaughtered them all and dropped nerve gas on London.
His first mistake was following Japan and declaring war on the USReminder that Japan did not reciprocate and never declared war on USSR or invaded them for a little two front thing. Japan instead got obsessed with SEA. His another mistake was not pivoting towards middle east instead of USSR. He was too obsessed. And his final mistake was not cultivating anti soviet nationalist movements in east europe and cause instability in the region. Before Hitler they hated Stalin a lot more.Like I said before, he just wasn’t smart enough, geopolitics are all about being smart and cunning. Not me attack me fast me win ha ha ha.
>>542024962don't bully me, I just type fast :(
>>542025199Of course that is the nature of leader-follower relationship. Leader is the leader because the people chose to follow him
Germany conquered the whole of Central and Western Europe losing 93,500 men. Then, they lost 4,3 million men against the Soviet Union. Opening the Eastern Front was the stupidest decision in human history.
>>542024416Do you think the winner is always "right"? Fucking imbecile
>>542027551Yes, obviously the morally correct ideology will win out in the long run
