What will humans do when AI solves and DOES everything?
>>542025670I look like this
It will never get to that. It’s the biggest scam in human history.
>>542025723>>542025705>>542025670Ai is an Indian scam.
>>542025670>when AI solves and DOES everything?die
there is no single bigger problem on this planet to solve than the "human infestation" question
>>542025670"Your request may go against my guidelines. Would you like to try something else?"
>>542025796You mean Indian infestation
>>542025723There's nothing magical about the human brain, Especially not yours that already gets mogged by dumb chatbots.
>>542025670Ohhh nooooI can't slave away for shekels at Mr shekelstein's office for social status good boy points ohhh noooooFuck off.lol.BEGIN TRANSMISSION:FrankincenseMyrrhThe Japanese term you’re probably looking for is ひきこもり (hikikomori).Literally, it comes from 引きこもる (hikikomoru), “to withdraw inward,” “to shut oneself away,” or “to stay inside.” Hikikomori has become an internationally recognizable term for a person who withdraws from school, work, and much of social life for an extended period. But there’s an important distinction: in Japanese discourse it generally describes severe/prolonged social withdrawal, not merely someone who likes solitude or lives as a recluse.There are also older, less clinical terms:• 隠遁 (inton) — withdrawal from worldly life; reclusion, often with a literary/religious/philosophical flavor.• 隠者 (inja) — hermit/recluse.• 世捨て人 (yoste-bito) — literally something like “a person who has abandoned the world”; a more dramatic/literary notion of renunciation.• 引きこもり (hikikomori) — modern social withdrawal, generally carrying a much more pathological/social-problem connotation.In fact, the hostility we can experience toward our withdrawal from this diseased society is, in fact, a pertinent feature of competitive societies themselves. The need to punish as a function of the totem pole social hierarchy.
>>542025831that's a related issue, yes
>>542025670i'll have coke
>>542025921***Why does being alone seem to offend people?***Because a highly competitive society doesn't merely need you to produce. It needs you to participate in the competition. Win or lose. And it needs the "losers" to remain in the limelight as whipping boys, as bad examples that suffer continually and this give legitimacy to the competitive system. "This is what happens to those who don't play the game!" To make "winners" feel that their own sacrificed life has been well invested. "At least that's not me!"Someone who says:>I don't want to compete. I want a small room, enough food, some books, music, and nobody bothering me.has done something ideologically inconvenient.They haven't necessarily defeated the system. They haven't even necessarily rebelled against it.They've declined its invitation.And that can be more irritating than opposition.A dissident can be incorporated into the system as an opponent: political activist, entrepreneur, artist, intellectual, revolutionary, etc. Those are all recognizable social roles. But the person who says “No, I would actually prefer to be alone” is difficult to turn into a productive participant (or marketable commodity).& There's an even deeper problem: solitude exposes how much of “social necessity” is actually social pressure.If everyone is working 50 hours a week, competing for status, optimizing their appearance, networking, maintaining an online presence, buying things, dating, advertising themselves, and anxiously monitoring everyone else, then the person sitting alone reading Victor Hugo can look almost subversive—not because he's attacking anyone, but because he's demonstrating that another allocation of human attention is possible. Another lifestyle is possible. And if enough people do it...Another world.
>>542025945And competition produces a peculiar contradiction:The society says:“Be weird.”But simultaneously:"Only within this narrow bandwidth."It sez:"Be yourself."But also:“Make yourself competitive.” So you are permitted individuality so long as your individuality can be converted into something socially legible:unique interesting marketable employable desirable successful.Solitude doesn't necessarily produce any of those things. The focus is always outward.Perform for the common good. Buy what if you think the common good editor be fit each and every individual to teach their highest calling? Human potential movement, Maslow, Logotherapy, Existentialism, etc. But solitude doesn't increase GDP.& Neither does otium—doing something because you have time to do it rather than because it generates an externally measurable return.That's why the old distinction between otium and negotium is so useful here. Otium isn't simply “doing nothing.” It historically encompasses contemplation, reading, conversation, study, artistic activity, wandering, thinking—activities undertaken outside the demands of commerce and public obligation. A society organized around negotium can start treating otium as suspicious.Japan makes this particularly visibleJapan didn't invent social withdrawal. European literature is absolutely full of hermits, monks, misanthropes, aristocratic recluses, solitary intellectuals, aesthetes, and people who simply disappear from ordinary society.But modern Japan gave the phenomenon a particularly striking name because the collision between extreme social expectations and withdrawal became impossible to ignore.And there is an interesting irony in the word hikikomori: the person has “drawn inward.”Not necessarily outwardly attacked society.Not necessarily conquered it.Simply ceased supplying himself to it.Etc etc/end
>>542025670Go fishing.
>>542025796there is no single bigger problem on this planet to solve than the "subhuman infestation" questionFIFY
>>542025938finish the joke
>>542025670AI will make you even more stupid, more fat, and more lazy than ever.
