What will come after they erase all history?
just look at the example of christianity, they will deny it, and then point out the internet still exists therefore they saved the information
History 2 Jewish Jewgaloo
>>542090071I go buy a bottle of Chivas, three bottles of decent wine, and four sixpacks of beer, and two packs of cigarettesevery baptism should be a celebration
Reminder that there were writings about the danger of digital files as the basis of society all the way back in the 70s and 80s.In France there were people who destroyed computer systems and wrote to the papers explaining all of this. (No one was caught).If you want to fight this, return to physical, preferably non-digital, media.
>>542090450>If you want to fight this, return to physical, preferably non-digital, media.needs real estate tho
>>542091023Nigger how poor are you that you can't afford cardboard boxes and bookcases?
>>542091084oh sorry I thought you were talking about getting slightly more books than you need... not to mention guarding it against niggers>John Dee's library was a legendary 16th-century private collection in Elizabethan England, containing roughly 3,000 printed books and 1,000 manuscripts at his home in Mortlake>The library was pillaged and scattered in 1583 while Dee was traveling in Europe
>>542090450you can physically store digital files (in fact, they are already all physically stored)a file being digital doesn't dictate the type of storage mediathere's nothing inherently bad about storing textual information in binary representation, because it's just another alphabetbooks can be burned, or banned, or altered, and it might be argued that storing a book as a binary representation lasered into crystal is superior an archival medium, as compared to ink daubed on glued-together slivers of flammable dried wood pulpelectronically-stored digital files being more easily deletable doesn't mean they're more ephemeral, because they're duplicated just as easily, far moreso than a bookyour argument doesn't make sense to me
>>542091373retard
>>542091319>3000 printed booksI have nearly 200 on a single book case, and I'm just some guy not an aristocrat with the ear of the monarch.>>542091373>books can be burned, or banned, or altered, and it might be argued that storing a book as a binary representation lasered into crystal is superior an archival medium, as compared to ink daubed on glued-together slivers of flammable dried wood pulpCool. I have a blu ray full of information. Tell me how, in your end-of-the-world extreme situation I get information off it. Digital media as a backup can't be defended at the extreme, but then treated as the extreme not existing when it comes to accessing it. You can't abandon a hypothetical argument half way through to argue your point.
>>542091467he is rightyou might think you are safe with your printed book, but editing it, printing it, binding it, and swapping out your beloved copy would be just as easy (if they care so much) as editing digital copiesthe media being physical made a difference in the era of manuscripts, not in the era of printing
>>542091589Learn how long digital media lasts moron
History is whatever the ruling power says it is as long is there is no accepted alternative and or proof to the contrary
>>542091589>printingHow do you print it? Seriously think about this before you answer.
>>542091536>I have nearly 200 on a single book case,so 15 book cases do not need at least a room of their own? you are obviously not an aristocrat, as you would need to have 85 IQ and not to shit in the middle of the street in order to be one
>>542091625why would I print it?>>542091615see >>542091319
>>542091373>lasered into crystalWhat if i don't have tens of thousands of euros to spend on a crystal reading and writing device?
>>542091635why can't you answer retard
>>542091693then you go back to india
>>542091624CLODO talked about this (the aforementioned French anti-computer lot). They pointed out that when history is nothing but files that can be edited then the past belongs to those at the keyboard.Paper archives can be destroyed of course, but their absence leaves a hole that is by itself telling. Look at the way people look at the redactions of the Epstein files. The black bars are themselves information.>>542091635Not everyone needs to be an archivist. In a doomsday scenario quantity is better than centralisation. Stop thinking in such a top-down way.>>542091664>why would I print it?Because you said: >the media being physical made a difference in the era of manuscripts, not in the era of printing>in the era of printingBut fine, let's assume that you're not printing it but merely accessing it. Describe this access.>I plug it into my computerWhat computer? Does it have a USB port? Can it read those files?
>>542091760because that issue was not addressed to me; but I answered it, as a reply to another postsee: >>542091664
>>542091817>Not everyone needs to be an archivist.>but files that can be edited then the past belongs to those at the keyboardI bet you are a cunt (hag) because no man can be so stupid>Because you said:no, that was not what I was talking about, I mentioned that to refute the australian anon's pointschizo hag
>muh digital mediaThis is an Apple II floppy disk. Tell me how you access it.>>542091884>because no man can be so stupidSo a digital file can't be deleted or edited after the fact?
>>542091960>So a digital file can't be deleted or edited after the fact?I won't waste any more of my time talking to schizo hags like you.
>>542092049I literally just opened a text file that said "pee pee" and changed it to say "poo poo," then hit CTRL-S.I win.
>>542090071What history do you want preserved? If it's important to you, print it out or buy the book.Whether you save it as a file on a floppy, DVD, blu-ray, what will it matter when kids can't fucking read today?
>>542091960>This is an Apple II floppy disk.Apple Lisa is only machine that ever used that kind of disk, so you'd have to buy a working Lisa.
>>542091373They require techonology to access that will soon disappear and is not reproduceable by a person. You sound dumb.
>>542092596This argument has been made for over 50 years now and there's yet to be a techno-fetishist response other than insults.
>>542092596>t. underage jeetwhat is this world coming to
>>542092688Read the Apple II floppy.Make your own computer.
>>542092740not only you are a schizo hag, you are a jeet too, aren't you
>>542092764Do you need a compatible computer to read certain computer files?
>>542090071>internet>history
>>542091817>CLODO talked about this (the aforementioned French anti-computer lot).imagine becoming an anti-computer nigger just a few years after affordable and capable personal computers became available to the public... and not before, when only government and big businesses could afford themyour heroes were rabid maoist/soviet faggots
>>542090071A new world endlessyly created from the zero'd out bits of the old. Leading to new discoveries and unearthing rare instances of archeotech buried in ancient hardrives. and endless cycle of the digital world.
