[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: mum.png (761 KB, 1156x592)
761 KB PNG
Sense of entitlement?
>>
White privilege
>>
8billion humans,there ought to be some crazy folks roaming around
>>
File: SIDS.png (536 KB, 1377x5915)
536 KB PNG
>>542104144
is this why judges default on giving women custody? Because if they don't, they'll kill the kids and society will go up in flames? Kind of like if they were honest about SIDS
>>
>>542104144
I honestly don't get it.
They spend 9 months with their baby, 24/7.
When they come out, there is already a bond.
Personally, I didn't feel an immediate bond with my kids at their birth. I think men claiming to have such a bond are either lying or created a bond with an idea rather than the being in front of them.
So, in the time it takes for the man to build such a relationship, that's when newborns are the most vulnerable, and, it is quite odd women are the ones doing it.
In fact, newborns are so fucking cute even if you don't feel anything for them, you don't want to hurt them.
>>
>>542104144
That ball-on-top hairdo is a dead givaway for craziness.
>>
>>542104630
Maternal instinct doesn't exist, it's been scientifically established, and newborns are screaming flesh turds
>>
>>542104851
>newborns are screaming flesh turds
Your shit isn't supposed to scream, Rakesh.
That said, my point is that they learn to love their baby for 9 months when it's inside them. You can actually start to see a personality if you pay attention.
>>
>>542105126
Maternal instinct doesn't exist, women don't automatically come to "love" their children

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/26/opinion/sunday/maternal-instinct-myth.html
>>
>>542104144
women need a win, and they've settled for this one like the bitches they are.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FgxacX72snA&ra=m
>>
>>542105223
>I'll debate my strawman and quote you
Please push your IQ into the three digits realm before replying.
Thank you.
>>
>>542105498
You're the low IQ retard here forcing unsubstantiated claims, if you actually have anything to support your claims feel free to quote me
>>
>>542105661
>You're the low IQ retard here forcing unsubstantiated claims,
Show me where I talked about maternal instincts.
>>
>>542105805
>They spend 9 months with their baby, 24/7.
When they come out, there is already a bond.
Inb4
>"That's not maternal instinct."
You're a retard
>>
>>542104144
some of these are likely false events to further the the actual crimes. yet another population control event that eliminates both the moehter and daughter at the same time. social media is truly the weapon that keeps on giving (AIDS/cancer)
>>
Women are the nigger of the world, think about it.
>>
>>542105958
I never claim it was maternal instinct, I even explained the process why it wasn't maternal instinct and you still read it as maternal instinct.
I'll go back to what I said earlier, get your IQ in order, you are not nearly half as smart as you think you are.
>>
>>542106350
The claim that women "bond" instantly with their children is, in scientific jargon, maternal instinct, that women have an innate ability to care and nurture newborns, this phenomenon is ascribed a catch all term "maternal instinct", when I say that women don't have maternal instinct; they don't have have the automatic "bonding" and "nurturing" behaviour you claimed they had, they don't, in fact most women report feeling nothing to negatively towards their newborns

You'll probably not read anything I wrote, and will harp on with another garbage concept called IQ, I get it, challenging deeply held beliefs often elicit violent reactions
>>
>>542106874
Except I never claimed it was automatic.
I even explained how it develop.
Thank you for playing.
>>
>>542106992
Uh, you didn't, but okay
>>
>>542105223
>>542104851
>>542104144
>>542105958
>>542106992

Biologically, Puberty is the Adulthood Age for Humans just as it is for Chimpanzees. Stop beating around the bush & just advocate for the ancient social standard where the age of majority is puberty. Grooming is based on Biological Instinct, any organism past puberty is commanded to begin biological reproduction. Females across numerous Animal Kingdom Species are recorded to be promiscuous per Darwin's observations in the 'Descent of Man'. Grooming Theory is an anti-scientific 1800s Feminist Hoax built on the idea that Evil Male Oppressors corrupt Women into Sexual Immorality. This Grooming Theory was promoted by Feminists to counter Conservative Opponents to Women's Suffrage who argued that women were too immoral for suffrage citing prostitution. Suffragists predicted that Feminism would lead to greater levels of sexual morality as evil men would be less able to exploit women, of course, the exact opposite ended up happening, thus confirming the instincts of ancient conservatives as well as as that of animal kingdom dynamics. Before Feminism & the Evil Male Oppressor Theory that was constructed to build Feminism, Males got the benefit of the doubt in terms of divorce/sexual harassment judgements. Males also received child custody by default. The Age of C0nsent was also set at puberty. The entire reason why Britain hiked the Age of Majority in India from 15/16 to 18 is to combat the hoax called 'grooming'. Teen Prostitutes as well as Prostitutes in general per Ancient Conservatism were considered to be Jezebel Harlots & Temptresses that were tempting Righteous Men into acts of immorality akin to how Eve ate the Forbidden Fruit & tempted Adam to do the same. Sexual Immorality was blamed on Women, people were following biological instinct & understood the properties of the Animal Kingdom. It's ironic how the modern feminist liberal experiment is less in touch with real world biology vs Ancient Conservatism.
>>
Kike brainwashing and the nigger-fication of American culture
>>
>>542106054
Didn't John Lennon say that?
>>
>>542104851
This
>>542104630
Patriarchal societies forced mothers to adore their children because they got backhanded or lobotomized if they didn’t want to do their job as a mother/housewife
>>542107911
Also women are naturally evil
>>
>>542107148
Faggot retard jeet cant read
>>
>>542108106
And yet, womans desire is to her husband, regardless of all the feminism horseshit brainwashing
They are evil sinners also, yet. And more vile as their main export is their sex and not their violence; but they still more often than not crave a pregnancy as a solution to all the problema they face
>>
>>542108106
>Also women are naturally evil
No, they're just incredibly responsive to peer pressure. If the prevailing ideology is child sacrifice, women will adopt child sacrifice. If the prevailing ideology is to be a trade wife, they'll do that. You can say that being so prone to pressure is evil in and of itself, but I'd argue that with few exceptions, women largely are incapable of being independently minded enough to think her own thoughts.
>>
>>542108106

see

>>542107677
>>
>>542108573
>trade wife
trad wife
>>
>>542108573

Women in a vacuum behave like all other promiscuous females in the animal kingdom.

see

>>542107677
>>
>>542108684
Stop referencing yourself you fucking retard
>>
>>542104420
Feminists pushed what's known as the Tender Years Doctrine.
>>
>>542104420
I personally think it was the same sexism we want now is what put ALL parental rights in the mother's hands in the case of single parenthood
>oh that kid stuff? Woman's work
>>
>>542108898
You don't think it has anything to do with decades of men NOT wanting to raise their own kids? Until recently, American men had a generally standoffish position as father, primarily he brought home money, that was it.
>>
>>542111266
This.
Even this site has mountains of posts of psychopathic fathers complaining about how they have no responsibilty to take care of their own child. men are by far the least responsible gender when it comes to taking care of childrens needs.

90% of mens complaints about child costody are completely self-centered.
>>
>>542104144
to make more room for jeets
>>
>>542113612
>90% of mens complaints about child costody are completely self-centered.
I see it as performative probably at least 80% of the time.
>>
>>542116142
Perfomative yes, but self-serving.
>>
>>542116295
Yeah. My favorite is the "I worked 16 hour days to provide for this family." dudes. 1, I've worked with those guys, they milk the day for all it's worth to delay going home. 2. They're too retarded to understand that their family would actually rather be a little poor but at least see dad when he's NOT drunk tired and mean
>>
>>542116295
yes im sure the mothers who btw divorce most of the time and take the kids arent selfserving you absolute simp



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.