For the yanks: how come you guys as a whole are such cowards that you have like 500 million guns in private hands but not one of you has started hunting down guys like the ones Thomas Massie read out loud this week, Luigi Mangione style? I'm not in favor of vigilanteeism of course, but sometimes the extreme circumstances and the rottenness of your state, that doesn't address the will of the people and its own laws, forces such things. Like a revolution but much less bloody. Seems to me that if there was someone who made the first move, and if you were smart enough to ditch your phones, internet and all that, and figured out a way to find where they live or where they go (who knows, maybe you can even tactically collaborate with the Chinese government just to get a safe basic infrastructure to help in this, though perhaps the Chinese like the US to keep shooting itself in the foot like this, morally and politically, and with the actual implications of the blackmail material e.g. wasting a lot of money in Iran/Israelpresumably, etc, but hypothetically they could change their opinion and an opportunity arise), this wouldn't be hard to do, and at the very least you'd make the rest that escaped live in terror and deter future ones. Cheers
I ain't reading all that. I'm happy for u tho. Or sorry that happened.
>>542153790YOU LOST TRANNY
>>542153790Sometimes you realize your psy op to make left wing mass shooters instead of right wing ones failedNever forget a woman shoot that ceo
>>542153790Sorry, Joao, this is MAGA country. We're pro-Israel, pro-Pedo, pro-War, pro-Christian, pro-Corporate, pro-Boomer, and pro-AI here. Trannies seething.
Stochastic terrorism is when you suggest a terrorist act that others could do. You won't do the terrorism yourself but you want to talk about terrorism as often as possible so that other people will overreact and do the terrorism. This way the impulsive man who does the terrorism for you, takes the blame while you remain innocent of any crime. Implying that people should commit murder with guns, is just a suggestion right? You aren't actually saying they should do it. Just strongly implying that they are cowards for not committing a murder.
Let me put it another way, using logistics. Lets discuss territory. The places you occupy are your territory. I tend to work from home and rarely go further than my yard or the local deli. That's my territory. The oligarch's who are guilty of rape and murder and cannibalism on Epstein island, they live in mansions in cities, on coasts or even overseas somewhere. Their territory, and my territory, do NOT overlap. So if the venn diagram of our lives do not intersect, then there is zero probability that any of my guns would ever be used against those ghoulish wendigos.
>>542154285why dont you hunt down epstein perpetrators? >>542154323I don't know what that means. >>542154361I don't know what that means either. You're saying mangione was a psyop to purge the left/make public opinion turn against them? Who cares, Mangione was just an example of 'direct justice' (which I don't agree with in general AND in his case), I'm talking about genuine ones, regardless of his case. >>542154431Fair enough. i dont know why you guys are obsessed by trannies though. Im not into 4chan pop culture. >>542154583Yes, I'm saying you should actively kill them. I can't do it because I'm a Portuguese peasant and not an American peasant living there and with 10 AR-15s at home. Otherwise I'd have to serioulsy consider it. What, killing pedophiles is bad now? Gary Plauche killed his son's abuser - before the abusers' trial btw - and an uncorrupt judge and/or jury (i dont know really how his case worked or how it works in the US in general) absolved him of a crime. Or gave him a slap on the wrist.
Lets also talk about the burden of proof.Can you prove they did a crime?Do you have evidence or are you just listening to the bloodthirsty mob of jealous haters that hate anyone with a dollar to their name?If you aren't absolutely certain that the person you target did the horrible things you think they did, then what if you are wrong? That would just make you a crazy murderer.
>>542153790Unlike you, I'm not a psychopath.
>>542154756Yes, hence the 'hunting' part. I'm not talking about being an angler fish and waiting for them to come to you by chance, that's never gonna happen of course. But it's presumably not that hard to get them. How many "video confrontations" you've seen of literal Rothschilds the ultimate bogeyman by truthers and so on? They're there on youtube. You can bump onto those people all the same. You think in all of those cases their security details - if they're there at all - are so omniscient they know these random strangers just have a video camera and not a knife or a gun? What about George Bush being thrown a shoe in Iraq? and thats the freaking president of the US, the most secure person in the world (theoretically... or at least if he doesnt step on the wrong toes like Kennedy but that's another story)
>>542154756>>542154583Just say admit you are a coward next time and save yourself the essay
>>542154987Don't waste your time Americans are all selfish pussys that's why jews have more power here than even Israel
>>542154826Hey, I can relate to what you are feeling. I feel it too. I also want to be Dirty Harry and face down the villains with my .44 magnum and say a cool one-liner about how they touch kids before executing them in cold blood. But it's a fantasy. It's an unrealistic dream that ignores every aspect of reality. If it was easy to kill satanic oligarchs then people would have done it already. It's the equivalent of a knight fighting a dragon.
>>542154911that's a fair point, you'd have to start with the ones there's mountains of evidence for, but your DOJ leaves alone. I understand the dangerous precedent this sets, i'm not a bloodthirsty revolutionary, but sometimes you gotta get shit done. Dont get all emotional on me, you guys are paying taxes to kill people in half the middle east as we speak. Im pretty sure these people deserve it far more than random civilians. And if you wanna say the war against Iran is just (very debatable, if anything I'd just take out their nuke potential and leave), and you dont target civilians, which I generally tend to believe, Israel which for all intents and purposes is the same entity as the US, certainly does target civilians systematically.
>>542155106Well, ackshuallly -pushes up thick glasses-The government asks the Fed to print money, which inflates the currency like a hidden tax. We don't have less dollars but each dollar is worth less. Jewish coin clipping for the digital age. So when the government collects taxes, what they are really doing is destroying your money, to increase the value of their money. You have to give up your money, and the government just deletes it to attempt to balance the books from when they overspent for 60 consecutive years.
>>542155062Why not? This is not exactly asking why you dont build your own rockets to live in Mars. It's just using numbers to your advantage, with a bare minimum of coordination or at least consciousness of the problem. At the very least I'd expect someone to try. Maybe they'd fail and be in very serious trouble, sure but it's possible. A guy shot even Reagan, i didnt see anybody creating plausible conspiracy theories about it. Unless that too was a psyop and everything is a psyop so all of history can be labeled fake and all statements about it become unfalsifiable.
>>542154938Why is this psychopathic? Here, read what I said with a very concrete example: killing pedophiles is bad now? Gary Plauche killed his son's abuser - before the abusers' trial btw - and an uncorrupt judge and/or jury (i dont know really how his case worked or how it works in the US in general) absolved him of a crime. Or gave him a slap on the wrist.
>>542155295i dont understand the relevance of that here.
>>542155483You mentioned that we pay taxes and those taxes are going into the hands of the Epstein class to rape and eat kids (paraphrasing)and I'm reassuring you and anyone else who is listening that no, we did not pay for the horrors that happened at Epstein island. The government prints money out of thin air. They don't need our taxes to do anything. So we are not actually guilty at all, at least not financially. We had no hand in it and most people would violently wish to stop it from happening. The guilt for raping, killing and eating children rests solely in the hearts and minds of the guilty parties who did the evil acts.That's all I was saying. My taxes didn't do that.
>>542155668I'm pretty sure that no economist agrees with that, but anyway, be that as it may, I was saying specifically to people that are saying im a psycho, or this would be a step too far, create a bad precedent etc. I understand the sentiment, but I pointed out that its not like Americans arent used to killing people all the time... each other, abroad, and so on. This would be the one of the most deserved ones. I mean since a lot of you people like Hitler here, not saying you necessarily, lets put it this way: would you have shot Stalin and his top minions if you had the chance? He wasnt put on trial. Heck he might not even know 50 or 90 or 95% of the atrocities that his system caused. But wouldn't you have taken the chance? Why the difference here, for the ones which are clearly guilty? this by contrast, is not political murder. I dont care about billionaires or their views on this or that. child abuse is not a political issue.
If you see a crime, you have some responsibility to act, but this gets real muddy when you are talking about crimes that you never saw, that you have no evidence of. And if the crimes are abstract financial crimes or they emerge from the bureaucracy then who is to blame? Is it a man's fault or is it a systems fault? Systems have momentum and perpetuate themselves over time. Stopping the system is a bit like trying to stop a bullet train going down hill.
You and I have a pretty serious difference of opinion. You see it as political while I see it as a moral problem. Like the ethics of our society have failed. I agree we should combat evil systems and evil organizations, on moral grounds. Fighting evil is worthwhile in and of itself. But you have to know what you are talking about and know what you are doing so you aren't sloppy. Because a sloppy vigilante does more harm than good.
>>542155941but im not arguing for far more controversial cases like Mangione's where it is pretty much a 'crime of the system', from those who oppose what the CEO's firm was doing. that's political and I dont wanna get into that. child abuse is absolutely not a political issue. however, I sympathize with your view, but Im saying if we could prove some beyond a reasonable doubt by various standards... testimony from Epstein's house manager Alfredo Rodriguez and others, by the victims, other pieces of evidence, etc.
>>542158818I feel like Thomas Massie is already doing what you suggest, by naming his list of guilty associates who should be prosecuted. We're in a weird place as a society, because the people who make the world work, got caught being naughty and they don't want to pay for it. We can't ask our rulers to punish themselves. They won't. So it causes a lot of loss of morale in general. Nobody likes that the gross pedophile cannibals are still out there being rich and happy. It doesn't seem fair. Why do the most evil people, live the best lives, while the best people, live the hardest lives. Why?
>>542153790Because despite your cope about your beliefs beibg universal very few of them actually agree with your views.It's usually what gets you seething browns>Pretend everybody hates your enemy>Call everybody who objects a shill, liar, jew, etc.>People stop bothering to respond so you assume you are winning>You grow cocky and start the fight>You lose said fight because you convinced nobody and are fighting alone
