https://www.avinc.com/2026/09/02/avs-locust-selected-for-nearly-500-million-army-counter-uas-contract-for-enduring-high-energy-laser-e-hel-program/
Johnny 5?
>>542203369This is ridiculous. Just nuke their source, total exterminatus.
>>542203711Okay, and what is your plan when they nuke back with twice the warheads?
>>542203369Revelation 9~7 And the shapes of the LOCUSTS were like unto horses prepared unto battle; and on their heads were as it were crowns like gold, and their faces were as the faces of men.>the locusts are like horses prepared unto battle crowned with gold and driven by the faces of men>https://www.zerohedge.com/military/army-spend-465-million-group-3-killer-anti-drone-laserWhy are the people in power trying to speed run the book of Revelation?
>>542203711>Nuking mountains and random open desertHmmmmmm
>>542203829>muh jewbook schizobabble
21st century warfare is so fucking gay
>>542203566
>>542203780Don't be a pussy, embrace death.
>>542203369If enough of them were produced they would help certainly, but this is experimental tech going up against techniques tested in actual heavy combat for almost five years straight. They might not be perfect at first and people will go “it doesn’t shoot 100.0% of them down? What a waste of money get some boys with shotguns out there” when with enough practice against real targets and tactics they could get it down pretty well. A combat laser actually melts a fiber optic cable like butter (it’s just plastic) so may be quite good at dealing with those since you don’t need an exact bead on it, just sweep the general area underneath it to snag the cable probably quite far out with a high success rate. You can easily spot fiber drones vs wireless since they carry a big spool canister. As for the non wireless where you would have a couple seconds to pivot and hit it as it’s coming in, that sounds like it should be the same thing and it ought to generally work, but because you have no time to make corrections and there is ‘dwell time’ for the beam to actually damage something, if for example you put out its camera eye but not the motors it will probably still keep coming and close that last couple meters blind and hit you anyway. I also wonder if they would start making metal arm/propeller drones that (at the expense of cost and range) would now take too much laser dwell time to easily damage in time before the strike. Like they save laser proofed drones only to take out these systems when spotted, etc. that is how the world works, nobody is going to just go “aww shucks they have something new it’s over we lost let’s go home” and will instead start working on countering it.
>>542203369Shits been around forever. Wonder why the change of heart now.Also- why does Northrup do everything first but never get the contracts?
I get it. Inside the cities you are protected "you must go with the program. Even giving your children over to pedophile elite, outside the cities drones will find you and kill you. There you go. That's their plan, but worse comes before that. Which I will detail tomorrow.
>>542205003Actually cool insight, you could make jewlywood movies.
>>542203829Idiot. The locusts are my drones.
>millions of dollars per unit meme laser weapon>gets blown up by a 20 dollar drone
>>542204529US didn't know what to do after cold war. Now everyone caught up because (30) years spent in the middle east has come to bite us in the ass. And so technology demonstrators from that time are now being produced. US already had an idea of what 6th gen planes and other weapon system would look like because well those issues are just physics problems and we solved a lot of the physics by the 80's and 90's. Computing power wasn't there though. As for lasers, its always been a battery/power source problem. That's why you see either large truck with generators or lasers on ships first. Lasers have their limitations though... but like everything, that's why you have another weapon system to cover for that weakness.So the real problem is now mass producing them affordably.
>>542203369Only near installations with their own powerstation there or nearby. Why, because of the amount of energy required>>542205003