[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: media.jpg (522 KB, 1080x1350)
522 KB JPG
>>
File: 1706132899965074.jpg (401 KB, 652x663)
401 KB JPG
>>542211596
I don't know dingbat, how would the most experienced, technologically advanced and logistically all-encompassing military on Earth beat the 0-combat-experience-across-the-board, still to this day brown water-having temu peasant army? Like how, realistically, could it happen?
>>
File: 1636837050611.jpg (179 KB, 1085x1085)
179 KB JPG
Not even (You) won your war with us, you sweatshop employee. You're speaking English right now, am I speaking gookanese?
>>
>>542211596
they don't even have close to comparable manpower or factory output, it would be a complete and overwhelming loss. It's like asking who would win god or a fart.
>>
>>542211730
>the korean war has entered the chat
take the L
>>
>>542211821
The Korean War is technically still ongoing. And infinitely more Chinese and North Koreans have died from starvation or 7.62x39 rounds from their own government than the US lost in the 1950s.
>>
>>542211596
It would be a pointless war that neither country wants because both countries economies are so intertwined, but it depends on the parameters as well. The parameters are just can America fuck China more than China can fuck America up then America wins
>>
>>542211596
Considering Chinese leadership is too scared to have their own special forces due to potentially being overthrown I think U.S.A. will win.

https://youtube.com/shorts/_kce-CAF8SU
>>
no military can defeat the US military
only public opinion can defeat the US military

that's why you see Muslims going so hard on propaganda for Iran, it already had shit public opinion but they're meming so hard you would think they still have a Navy and heads of state
>>
>>542211821
Why wouldn't you pick Vietnam? We kept south Korea free. We lost vietnam (who became based anyways)
>>
>>542211596

WHICHEVER JEW EATS THE MOST BABY BRAINS WINS
>>
>>542211596
Probably not well. The USA's strategy is to deprive its enemies of the capability of self-defense, then pull away support for Israel's 1 to 1000 war against every neighbor in its region. The USA can't even defeat Iran and the USA military is ran by Israel and integration is almost complete.
>>
>>542213921
>The USA's strategy is to deprive its enemies of the capability of self-defense
allies* we are just now allowing Germany and Japan to arm themselves, but it's about 15 years too late.
>>
Holy kek, look at all the /k/oping transwinning miggers here
Lol.lmao
>>
>>542211596
>glances at chink performance in korea
lol poor chinks
>>
>>542211596
it doesn't. Russia is what happens when you think (conventional) war is actually possible in this millennium.
>>
>>542211596
Why can it only hold 5 rounds?
>>
File: 850_millionaire_Jeb.jpg (48 KB, 368x640)
48 KB JPG
>>542218475
Gimme back my bullets.
>>
China has no modern warfare experience. A whole lot of soldiers that have never been shot at or had to deal with fast decision making under heavy fire. US is chalk full of veterans
>>
>>542218475
How many shells do you need to cut a man in half?
>>
>>542218475
Tube length. There are more conventional magazine loaded variants, but they are bulkier, more awkward and, really not that much faster to reload for what a shotgun is usually used for.
>>
>>542211730
And if you run out of vespene gas, what then?
>>
>>542221359
breathe deep
>>
>>542211596
Look how they did in your country.
>>
>>542218475
Why the fuck do you need more then 5?
>>
>>542211596
Better than China expects, worse than the US expects.
>>
File: 1581514392279.jpg (200 KB, 500x544)
200 KB JPG
>>542221359
>NUCLEAR LAUNCH DETECTED
I can't have the gas, neither can you.
>>
>>542211794
Only one of those two is real
>>
File: M1014-1.jpg (515 KB, 2000x1250)
515 KB JPG
>>542222635
Why wouldn't you, dumbass tranny???
>>
>>542211596
We don't have the production to keep up with China.
>>
>>542211930
WW2 Pacific front is technically still ongoing as Russia and Japan never signed a peace treaty.
>>
File: 1661686704261795.png (304 KB, 465x512)
304 KB PNG
>>542222761
Because I can actually hit my target unlike you Cletus who couldn't even hit those two niggers who stole your chicken.
>>
>>542211596
China would do nothing and win.
>>
>>542221654
gottem
>>542221359
or make marines
>>
>>542211596
A war between these two nations isn't viable. China has no naval presence, and of the past two years of the trying, Chinese-made anti-air weapons haven't caught a single US aircraft, including those manufactured in the 90s. The only advantage China could muster is numbers, but they have no possible way to leverage infantry against the United States.
A war between the two would just be similar to what is going on in Iran, except Iranian missiles are better than Chinese missiles, and China has even more bombable targets. It'd just be boring-as-shit news stories of bombings and China claiming it is going to retaliate any moment, which would be cyclical for a year or two until the Chinese leadership decides to exchange nuclear missiles.
>>
>>542223111
> China has no effective anti ship weapons
Suuuuuure. How many ships of yours entered the strait in the past 6 months?
>>
>>542223183
How many american ships sunk in the past 6 months?
>>
China can actually absorb casualties. Mutts will start crying as soon as 50 bodybags come back.
>>
>>542221250
Only thing shotguns are used for in combat is breaching doors. The rounds are specifically made for that one purpose, not killing enemy combatants.
>>
>>542223111
Consider the following: China has been engaged in constant grey zone warfare against the west since about 1949. You think them absorbing and replacing the west’s industrial base isn’t part of a long term strategy?
>>
>>542218475
Shotguns are used for breaching, you unironically dont need anymore than that. Theyre pretty useless compared to a rifle for a soldier.
>>
>>542225097
It won't kill a plated guy. Which will allow him to to blow himself and your heckin tier 1 operators (literally the avengers) and shout allah akbar even. I'm waiting to see if they are really effective against drones but it seems that it's just a myth or slavs are too retarded



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.