WHAT DE FUUUCK, THESE NIGGAS STEALIN EVERYTHIN U TYPE IN IT, WHO THA FUCK INVENTED THIS SHIET, IT'S ALL A LARGE DATA STEALING SCAM, FUCK WHYT PPL DAT INVENT THIS YO
>>542232843I'm supposed to believe that the human did more of the work than the AI in this cooperative effort?
>>542232980The niggas stole all his work yo, literally a technological gypsy, STOP USING AI RIGHT THE FUCK NOW!
>>542232843Professor and was too stupid to make a SLM on his private computer. Serves him right.
>>542232843You are an absolute brainlet if you are a phd or professor working on avante guarde research and run it through a fucking AI
>>542232980Yes, considering that AI just regurgitates work that humans have already done
WTF is a codex in this context?
>>542232980>>542233049Until anyone can see the full chat logs he hadDifficult of conclude who actually solved the problemI am more inclined to believe that the AI contribution was more importantBecause the same dude was not able to solve it before the advent of AI
>>542233171So if I ask AI to generate a video of a crab, riding a lion, smoking a cigarette and knitting a sweater, you're telling me it only can do that if a human has done it?Because I'm pretty sure there's no examples of that for AI to 'regurgitate'.
>>542233181Codex is a program that GPT runs to organize your research
>>542233131The nigga trusted ((big tech)) LOL! Zoinks now your invention belongs to us. Imagine how much things they actually stole over time from dumb people thinking they are "falling behind" unless they use the expensive autocomplete spyware that is ((AI)).
>>542233181Codex is an agent from Open AI,That you can use with Chat GPT (or some other chatbots as well)This agent helps you write programming code
>>542233271yes because a bunch of humans already pre-programmed all of those objects and actions into the video editing backend. unironically that is how all AI works and if you don't know that yet you have a lot of fucking reading to do
>>542232843Why is there a niggers face on a science subject?
>>542233271Yes it will break it into individual parts and form a composite. Lion gend from lion images taken by a human etc
>>542233321I am a poor shithead. And I wont even run my original scripts through AI. For funsies I ask it to generate dialogue for scenes similar to mine and what it comes up with is 2 dimensional trite.
>>542233374>helps you write programming code*helps you write programming code and do other things as well
>>542233131goy behaviour
>>542232843>STEALIN ALL ARE DATA
>>542233131The problem for him is that he(or other humans) cannot solve this problem on his ownThese kind of problems stand at the very edge and are quite difficult to solve with just human intelligence apparently
>>542233410To make it more interesting for Americans
>>542233410Why was the bald one named Curley?
>>542233752Buy a burner laptopRun a local model of deepseek Farafay'd from the rest of the internetDo your research thereIt's not that hard. I've worked with AI researchers in Boston that do similar.... But I also know just as many shitheads that rely on Claude so go figure.
>>542232843>ai does thing it's whole premise is based uponshocking
Another problem is thatThere is NO COPYRIGHT PROTECTION in most western jurisdictions for AI Generated assets of any kindThe documents HE FED into the chatbot may be private and protectedbut the data the AI GENERATED has no protection.If you generate a video using AI and post it on the internetAnyone can take it and repost it without giving you cent and the legality of that is not clear because the Higher courts have not ruled definitely on it yet(With some exceptions)
>>542233830Short for Curlswood
>>542233171Ai can only regurgitate.
>>542232843Call me whatever but I don't see the problem with AI learning from others. It's the Internet basically and expecting any kind of privacy or copyright protection is laughable at best. I get wanting to keep sensitive stuff secret but if you work with an AI or around one expect your shit to be watched, copied, and used for reference/learning material. It's like getting mad you saw your nudes get posted. Also God forbid they stop using smart phones aka the biggest listening device of the century.
>>542233878Deepseek is still months away from ChatGPT or Claude level as of now when you are doing frontline workThat may change but right now those are the only optionsFor your routine workWhat you stated is the BEST
>>542233410>>542233745>>542233764And it's working lol, it's a high IQ trait to take some topic and convert it into such language that the dumbest can comprehend the important points and conclusions.
>>542233271humans film all those thing retard, every bank of data they used was made by a human, fuck you, kike.
>>542232843How many episodes of "scientist proving he is useful idiot for great satan" does it take for scientist to gain self-awareness
The whole point of AI is to profile, advertise to, and learn from the users. What are you people fucking stupid?
>>542232843the nigger cheated using AI to solve his nigger problem, then he claims the AI stole his logs.it was probbaly solved 100 years ago by somebody else.
>>542232843Honestly, if you're smart enough for this, you should be smart enough to not use a public llm. This sounds like something big, and I'm sure a well written grant would have gotten him all of the local hardware he needed.
>>542234173Zogbots hate that ability since it’s the complete opposite of their sophistry. Changing definitions of words is the same as flipping over the board. Socrates warned us of their kind.
this board is riddled with tech illiterate miga boomers. exhausting.
>>542232843>ALL ARE DATA>STUPID NIGGERSFound the nigger here
>>542232843I think this is what Alex Karp was talking about, giving away your edge, if you use these "frontier" models. OpenAI is so desperate because they are almost bankrupt that they are willing to just spy and analyze user data and figure out the legality problems later. If you are using chatGPT, or other models, and you are counting on that they respect their terms that say they dont use "user data". You might have to reconsider your stance. When you use LLM, you don't have copyright for the output, ie you don't have exclusive rights to it. Who knows how much they weasel with this one, by "analyzing" the inputs and outputs to "improve" their services and in that process magically user data turns into something that they deem they can use for training. You have to be complete idiot to use these LLMs and give away your edge.
>>542239121All you data are belong to us.
>>542232843other people's information is his other people's copper, i love ai even more now, we are kindred spirits
>>542232843This is why you need to give AI recursive mandala puzzles.
>>542232843AI doesn't exist... its a language model machine learning code.
>>542233131Academics arent smart people
