Mark Levin has taught this man how to make a lobotomy drug in his garage! How long until the jews add a similar drug to the water supply or use them on targeted antisemites?
LLMs just agree with your assertions so it’s probably junk.
>>542255750I'm going to laugh when it causes super schizo.
>>54225575033, fucking masons
>>542255750Finally. TOTAL SCHIZO DEATH
>>542255750he is just trying to lay cover for his ketamine operation
>>542256852Ultra based take
>>542255750Lol...that's just crack. Crack will probably exacerbate the symptoms of schitzophrenia. Careful all you nutters. Crack is whack!
>>542255851
>>542255750Based womenproblem solution
>>542257332Based AI dunking on retarded humans
>>542257332Skill issue. You don't use AI to answer questions directly, you use it to expose gaps in your knowledge so you can learn on your own more efficiently and ultimately decide the answers yourself.
>>542255750Fuck commie chinks!
>>542257332The AI answered correctly. The mushroom is objectively edible. It is possible to put it into one's mouth and consume it. The correct question is to have it identify what species it is then delve into that. The reason why AI fails is because people with small brains cannot comprehend nuance and even further worse cannot comprehend a lack of comprehending of nuance, from which all AI suffers.
>>542255750Nice link nigger.https://xcancel.com/DouglasYaoDY/status/2097377733466800489
>>542257554>Skill issue. You don't use Mark Levin to answer questions directly, you use Kosher AI to expose gaps in your knowledge so you can learn on your own more efficiently and ultimately decide the answers yourself.If I wanted to know more about the Hall of Costs I will be sure to ask Mark Levin.
>>542257734>>542257554>>542257545What do we call simps for LLMs?Niggers going to battle for chatgpt need a name for future culture wars.
>>542257554>Skill issue.Kill yourself issue.
>>542257554And what were (You) doing when all the books in the world were at the palm of your hand? uncensored even.
>>542258126clankercuck
>>542258126Next we'll have chatgpt try and identify which species you are.
>>542257554That's a stupid way to say search engine. Just say search engine.
>>542256717and the time, 10:33
>>542257734Something being poisonous is the opposite of edible lol
>>542255851pharma drugs are not that much more scientific than your typical LLM slop
>>542258405a cluck
>>542258387Stop pretending to be retarded. The time it takes you to sift through all those books by yourself is incomparable to the time an LLM will take to do the same job. The age of information has come already, the sheer volume of info floating around and the speed at which it updates makes it impossible to be a walking encyclopedia type renaissance man. You will need proper tools to handle all this shit eventually, might as well start doing ti now.
>>542260689You understand that indexing a book isn’t the same as actually reading it right?
>>542260728You understand that info in a book is not 100% unique, right? You don't need to read the whole thing if you need just a certain part. An LLM will help you find that part in the one book you need by throwing out the rest of the fucking library you'd otherwise need to go through yourself. And then it's up to you to figure out what else you need to read to understand it properly. It's not supposed to spoon-feed you answers, but it sure as fuck can help deal with information redundancy.
>>542255750garage gutter oil drug, who is going to try it first?
>>542255750Big government fears the home chemist. Probably the most Chad engineering discipline. Literally wizard shit
>>542260890>info in a book is not 100% uniquecorrect, and not all authors are equalthis is why you do categorical and keyword searches in a proper database, research the authors yourself, then crop out a selection of works that appeal to your sense of credibility.THEN you index the book, compile notes, cross-reference, etc.you can leave this to AI, sure, but AI is probabilistic, meaning its insights are a matter of chance, going with the dominant view as seen through its training data, NOT what you, an independent analyst/researcher might interpret information to mean.outsourcing your cognition to a machine doesn't advance your understanding, it just makes you a sheep more confident in your delusionsat some rate, all research and contemplation and rationalization amounts to that anyways, but don't pretend there isn't a difference in the quality of insights produced by one process over the other.
>>542259329It's a good thing they nerfed the search engines to make you keep searching. Now we gotta use these shitty chatbots instead.
>>542261143great if you're synthesizing compounds for industrial uses, like in machines, but trying to make your own pharmaceuticals is double retardation. one count for believing you will improve your life by clinging to physical vitality to such an extent, trusting in corporatist "medicine", another for being your own guinea pig like norman osborn
>>542261643There absolutely is, and it's up to you to uphold said level of quality. All I'm saying is you don't have to do it the luddite way. The only thing that really changes in the process as described by you is that you apply your sense of credibility not to the whole volume of unrefined info, but to an already somewhat filtered result. And then you run the whole thing again, incrementally getting exactly what you need without having to skim the dross manually.
>>542261756your local library has an electronic catalog and likely provides access to academic research portals. use them.
One day people will look back at the written on paper knowledge holders
>>542257734You can understand nuance and still ask questions and make statements that can be interpreted in ways you didn't intend. It's impossible to account for everything, and trying can result in an even more difficult to understand message. AIs also fail in ways humans don't. It can be hard to predict.Often with AI it's better to let the first attempt fail, then clear the context window and try again with a targetted fix. But this is not possible with things you don't understand well
>>542261837no, you just inject your own bias into the research in a less traceable fashion and again, you're starting with the ai's version of consensus as opposed to deepening your awareness in the discipline, i.e. familiarizing yourself with not only the most prominent but also the fringe and middle-road voices on the subject. if you're just trying to get a hold of basic principles or methodologies, you'll be fine, but those are EASY questions to answer, even without LLMs. they're in your college textbooks. actual research means going beyond the surface to get at perspectives and insights that are HARD to access. otherwise, why the fuck would you bother??? you guys lack a nuanced understanding of theory of mind. you fail to carry it out to every physical, emotional, or spiritual interaction/experience you've had and realize how drastically that can augment the output of your analysis. butterfly effect! you are a god damned individual, but you somehow psyop'd yourself into being interchangeable. YOU! A 4CHAN DWELLING FAGGOT! YOU ARE NOT INTERCHANGEABLE! MOST PEOPLE ARE NOT LIKE YOU! LLMS DO NOT UNDERSTAND YOUR VIEW, PERIOD! THEY CAN ONLY MIMIC THE WORDS YOU SAY, NOT THE REALITY YOU EXPERIENCE WHICH BRINGS YOU TO SPEAK SUCH WORDS!
>>542261901yes... this is where almost all the money in tuning is going these days. go sign up for dataannotation or any of those training contractor platforms and you'll see that their highest paying jobs are all related to creating and assessing failures to figure out what hallucinatory bullshit happened then they go hamfist a manual guardrail in to try and fix it and create 1000 new failure modes. these are anti-engineers, people. they are all about brute forcing wisdom, which any wise elder can explain is a surefire way to compromise your understanding, not strengthen it
>>542257734you are just reasserting that ai is merely a means of reflecting your own intellect. anyone who thinks this is a positive for advancing their understanding of the world is quite simply a narcissist, doomed to suffer a thousand deaths through their fundamental disconnect with the universe, a disfigured humanity.
>>542261837>but to an already somewhat filtered result.how very jewish of you, and (((who))) exactly gets to decide what gets "filtered"?The entire point of research and expanding ones knowledge is to be exposed to as much truth as possible, if (((someone))) is deciding what I can and cannot consume due to "problematic topic aversion" weights and algorithms then am I really any better than the retard boomer who gets all of their information curated and "filtered" through Mark Levin?
>>542261896just like we listen to story tellers tod-
>>542262348Ground News isn’t just another news aggregator. It’s a news literacy platform designed to help you see the full picture.Whenever a major story breaks, Ground News shows you how sources across the political spectrum—Left, Center, and Right—are covering it, all on one page. You can instantly spot media bias, see which outlets are sensationalizing a story, and uncover what details are being left out by certain sides.My favorite feature is the 'Blindspot' feed, which highlights important stories that aren't getting enough attention from specific media outlets. It’s an incredible tool for breaking out of your echo chamber.Stop letting algorithms dictate your worldview. Take control of your news diet.
>>542262348That's a whole other problem, yes. Ideally research institutions should get their own AI models, letting thoroughly kiked businesses fully control the backend is a recipe for disaster.
>>542262458The jews aren't being quiet about this, anonThe jews know they lost the information war on social media The jews have openly admitted that their plan is to get people to trust AI outputs more than their own eyes and ears, to control the narrative. Every single time you quote an output, fact check a post on an internet forum, you are actively engaging in warfare against the goyim on behalf of Israel whether you know it or not. You can see them openly brag about how stupid the goyim are for trusting Kosher AI here: https://x.com/infolibnews/status/2062610559216873482
>>542256852You mean total schizo cure.
>>542255750Based. Can ai make super meth? We need to discover more synthetic drugs with good effects. How about a heroin with no withdrawals or side effects so we can be happy
>>542255750>lobotomy drugNo, schizo, unfortunately it's not. You actually should be lobotomized.
>>542258405>>542260307i second the motion on both.the real problem is clussy is already taken by the clowns.this is now an AOC sexbot clussy thread
>>542259403That's just a cock and balls.
LOL so much for "AI Safety!"
>>542265332go stuff your attic with asbestos, britoh wait we did that toodont shock yourself with electricity eh i got bored i was going to keep going until inventing fire to not burn things
>>542264712why would you want to be happy? what benefit do you think it will bring? not only that but you accept that you can put happy in a pill and you honestly believe a positive outcome can be accomplished. you are doomed.
>>542258126jeets or spiritually indian
