>>542283952What's the net job creation?
>>542283952if they build the datacenters then yeah obviously there are some extra contracts, until they are built. if you justify the growth with a few thousand jobs for the IT dudes taking care of those extra servers then it's overther'es also the case for how many jobs went away vs how many created. if you close 5 mil jobs and create new 1 mil jobs ... its' bad
>>542284019it's all women telling grok to send emailsthey explicitly do not hire men for these positions
>>542283952I genuinely don’t believe this, or they’re using Jewish sorcery to conjure the number. The only people who seem excited about AI are the worst human beings in the world, that’s enough to fear it.
>>542284234Main point about AI is that it doesn't need manpower, so yes, this must be a retarded trick.
>>542284234Its human captcha monkeys, its cheaper than astra
>>542284234They are probably using a multiplier to estimate the numbers. The rationale is that for example one AI job 'creates' coffee shop jobs, real estate job, service jobs,etc because the Ai employee has to spend his money on something
>>542284553… They reinvented trickle down economics?
>AI creates new jobsFOR AI!!!!EAT SHIT FLESH BAGS!
>>542283952are these 1 mill jobs in the room with you rn OP?
>>542284641Yes Using jeets and their nepotistic hiring practices
>>542283952That’s especially impressive when you take into account that AI doesn’t exist.
>>542284234>Jewish sorceryIt's called rabbinics
>>542283952For jeets.
