After this war in Ukraine when it is over, Russia has a good chance of not remaining a white country because it will have a big deficit of men in relation to women, which exists to a lesser extent than before the war. And Russia will need men for their women to be inseminated and for the economic sector to recover their country, which will open the gates of Russia for jeets and niggas because there are no white westerners who want to move to Russia. This will be an opportunity for hikikomori to get a life and a woman because Russian women would rather be inseminated and wash and cook for a Japanese hikikomori than for a drunk Slav or for jeets or niggas. It's much better for those of you who are hikikomori to live with a white woman in a kommunalka surrounded by roads with mud than to live hopelessly within the same walls of your parental home in Japan where you can't cope with social pressure. Russia doesn't really emphasize the culture of shame.
>>542290621Her physically making smile says it all
>>542290621Obligatory spam...(Sprry! It simply MUST BE DONE though)..Begin transmission:The Japanese term you’re probably looking for is ひきこもり (hikikomori).Literally, it comes from 引きこもる (hikikomoru), “to withdraw inward,” “to shut oneself away,” or “to stay inside.” Hikikomori has become an internationally recognizable term for a person who withdraws from school, work, and much of social life for an extended period. But there’s an important distinction: in Japanese discourse it generally describes severe/prolonged social withdrawal, not merely someone who likes solitude or lives as a recluse.There are also older, less clinical terms:• 隠遁 (inton) — withdrawal from worldly life; reclusion, often with a literary/religious/philosophical flavor.• 隠者 (inja) — hermit/recluse.• 世捨て人 (yoste-bito) — literally something like “a person who has abandoned the world”; a more dramatic/literary notion of renunciation.• 引きこもり (hikikomori) — modern social withdrawal, generally carrying a much more pathological/social-problem connotation.In fact, the hostility we can experience toward our withdrawal from this diseased society is, in fact, a pertinent feature of competitive societies themselves. The need to punish as a function of the totem pole social hierarchy. Why does being alone seem to offend people?Because a highly competitive society doesn't merely need you to produce. It needs you to participate in the competition. Win or lose. And it needs the "losers" to remain in the limelight as whipping boys, as bad examples that suffer continually and this give legitimacy to the competitive system. "This is what happens to those who don't play the game!" To make "winners" feel that their own sacrificed life has been well invested. "At least that's not me!"
>>542290866Someone who says:>I don't want to compete. I want a small room, enough food, some books, music, and nobody bothering me.has done something ideologically inconvenient.They haven't necessarily defeated the system. They haven't even necessarily rebelled against it.They've declined its invitation.And that can be more irritating than opposition.A dissident can be incorporated into the system as an opponent: political activist, entrepreneur, artist, intellectual, revolutionary, etc. Those are all recognizable social roles. But the person who says “No, I would actually prefer to be alone” is difficult to turn into a productive participant (or marketable commodity).& There's an even deeper problem: solitude exposes how much of “social necessity” is actually social pressure.If everyone is working 50 hours a week, competing for status, optimizing their appearance, networking, maintaining an online presence, buying things, dating, advertising themselves, and anxiously monitoring everyone else, then the person sitting alone reading Victor Hugo can look almost subversive—not because he's attacking anyone, but because he's demonstrating that another allocation of human attention is possible.Another lifestyle is possible. And if enough people do it...Another world.And competition produces a peculiar contradiction:The society says:“Be weird.”But simultaneously:"Only within this narrow bandwidth."It sez:"Be yourself."But also:“Make yourself competitive.”So you are permitted individuality so long as your individuality can be converted into $$$ (something socially legible):unique interesting **marketable** employable desirable successful.Solitude doesn't necessarily produce any of those things.
>>542290866The focus is always outward.Perform for the common good. Buy what if you think the common good editor be fit each and every individual to teach their highest calling? Human potential movement, Maslow, Logotherapy, Existentialism, etc. But solitude doesn't increase GDP.& Neither does otium—doing something because you have time to do it rather than because it generates an externally measurable return.That's why the old distinction between otium and negotium is so useful here. Otium isn't simply “doing nothing.” It historically encompasses contemplation, reading, conversation, study, artistic activity, wandering, thinking—activities undertaken outside the demands of commerce and public obligation.A society organized around negotium can start treating otium as suspicious.Japan makes this particularly visibleJapan didn't invent social withdrawal. European literature is absolutely full of hermits, monks, misanthropes, aristocratic recluses, solitary intellectuals, aesthetes, and people who simply disappear from ordinary society.But modern Japan gave the phenomenon a particularly striking name because the collision between extreme social expectations and withdrawal became impossible to ignore.And there is an interesting irony in the word hikikomori: the person has “drawn inward.”Not necessarily outwardly attacked society.Not necessarily conquered it.Simply ceased supplying himself to it.
>>542290621Pagan polygamy fixes this. Russia must Retvrn.
>>542290866Factual correct. That's why I said that socially withdrawn people in Japan have a better chance of success in Russia
>>542290866>>542290932That's why I think the broader phenomenon is bigger than hikikomori. A person can be socially functional while psychologically becoming something like a voluntary recluse: reducing or eliminating obligations, possessions, networking, social media, career ambition, public visibility, etc., and constructing a private territory in which his attention belongs to him.And that has a very long history.The monk in his cell, the aristocrat disappearing into his country estate, the Romantic wanderer, the flâneur, the hermit, the decadent aesthete, the eccentric scholar, the cabin-dweller, the punk squatting in an abandoned building—all of them represent different versions of the same basic proposition:“My life does not have to be available to the world.”That's a radical proposition in a society whose greatest scarce resource is increasingly your attention.See:Commodify Your Dissent, Thomas Frank article. Dated but ur smart enough to find it's application to this dystopia?GL, Getting off this shitsite (for weeks at a time, and then only dropping back in to paste large swaths of gpt text & bounce) is Step 1.Download old books.Burn to disc.Take a nap.This may take a while..Thomas Frank's “Commodify Your Dissent” is almost a perfect companion to what we were just talking about.The joke/argument of the essay is that capitalism is extraordinarily good at absorbing opposition by turning opposition into a commodity. Rebellion becomes a style, alienation, a marketing demographic, anti-establishment attitudes become things you can buy.And that creates an interesting distinction with the recluse:• Dissenter: “Your society is fucked.”• Countercultural consumer: “Your society is fucked—and I'll buy the T-shirt.”• Entrepreneurial dissenter: “Your society is fucked. Here's my $299 course on escaping it.”• Hikikomori/recluse: “Whatever. I'm busy with my own life.”(Kierkegaard also important here. )
>>542290932Last TGThat last one is strangely difficult to commodify if it is genuinely accompanied by withdrawal from consumption and status competition.Of course, capitalism has gotten pretty good at commodifying even withdrawal: gaming setups, streaming subscriptions, “cozy” rooms, minimalist aesthetics, wellness retreats, van life, cottagecore, anti-work books, etc. The system can eventually say:You don't need to leave society! You can purchase an aesthetically pleasing version of rejecting society.Which is very Frank.And there's an even nastier version of it: “Be authentic.”Because once authenticity becomes a social requirement, you have to perform your authenticity. Your rebellion needs an audience. Your nonconformity needs an Instagram. Your refusal of consumerism needs the right $180 jacket.That's why genuine withdrawal can seem almost more threatening than conventional political rebellion. The rebel still cares about the social arena enough to fight in it.The recluse says: I don't want the arena.I don't owe you anything. At all. But you owe me something. So repay me, now.And that connects beautifully with our earlier interest in otium vs. negotium. Otium represents a space where one's attention isn't immediately being converted into economic or social value. In that sense, protecting a little territory of uselessness may be a more radical act than buying an enormous amount of countercultural stuff.Frank's essay is basically asking: What happens when capitalism learns to sell you your rebellion?The recluse asks the more annoying question:What if I don't buy the rebellion—or participate in the market for rebellion—at all?Stars of the Lid (10/10, better than Eno ambient, every single release is amazing!)https://rutracker.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2608573Dead Can Dance (10/10 timeless tribal, first 4 releases!)https://rutracker.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4400522Mystery!https://rutracker.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5536103
>>542290967I think I killed your thread, anon, sorry
>>542290621This is a lie, white women only care about dick size. Why you think they are never with their own men?
>>542290621a hikikomori doesn't leave his house unless absolutely necessary what makes you think he will move to a foreign country in order to get laid?lmao
>>542291925> move to a foreign countrymove to a foreing 3rd world country where 3/4 of all population lives in brazilian ghetto type of stuff*
That bitch in pic related is supposed to be a 10 but she lost her virginity at 15 and sucked plenty of dicks which makes her a 0 to me. I'm not even joking I wouldn't date her if she begged me for it
>>542292213Could you really, REALLY not fucking tell that this is all AI dogshit?
>>542291074Possibly. I wouldn't know but maybe it depends on *where* in Russia? I dunno
>>542292500Preferably in big cities. They wouldn't be able to do it in small towns or villages in Russia.
>>542292213A woman like that is good at washing your boxers and socks.
>>542290621We have enough lodyry of our own, fuck off we're full
>>542290621hikkomori dont leave their house, let alone move to another country
>>542290621You might be able to adopt a Ytoid girl with a BBC boyfriend, but thats it. Whitoid women do be too craycray to even be bought nowadays. Better settle for an easygoing BBC
>>542290621They could all die in a fire.Yes, I once spoke to a girl who was one, half Japanese, half Irish, did nothing but play video games all day, walked around naked everywhere, was an unashamed gooner and did so with women she did online, despised God, and was mentally ill to the point where she would absolutely cry if she was outside of her house (she lived alone but on heavy government assistance).To some of you, she might sound like the dream girl, but she really isn't. She needed Jesus, but instead decided that being a massive, miserably degenerate pervert who cries the very few times she leaves the confines of her house is the way to go.
>>542295829>IrishScot irish celt norf england immigrants in america are weird creepy faggots.
>>542295904She actually lives in Ireland. My point still stands.
