>FST genetic distance between a European and SSA pure black like Yoruba = 0.15>FST genetic distance between a American Grey Wolf and a Coyote = 0.15And yet American grey wolves and coyotes are considered different animals while Europeans and blacks are considered the same species. Truth or not?
>Scientific racismDo not embrace this terminology.
>>542309391The thing is, Wolves and Coyotes are not considered different species because of their genetic distance. Usually animals this genetically close to each other ARE considered the same species. Wolves and Coyotes are considered different species because they occupy different ecological niches and normally do not reproduce with each other when they occupy the same ecosystem under normal conditions. If you want to argue Eurasians and Sub-Saharan Africans are different species, you have to argue that they occupy different ecological niches. This should not be impossible, but difficult because we see humans as an animal outside of the ecosystem.
>>542309575It’s just pattern recognition. It’s actually probably redundant in fact.
>>542310022Whites and blacks are separated by 50,000 of non mixing. Whites and blacks have different ecological niches (whites invented agriculture) blacks remained Hunter gatherers until recently. Whites and blacks share different behavioural traits, sizes, bone density, bone structure and phenotypes in the same way wolves and coyotes do. The only different is that wolves and coyotes diverged earlier, so what?
>>542309575>0.192This means that SSAs and EAs are different species, no?
>>542309391>spelled coyote>pronounced KAI-YOH-TEE
>>542309391I'd heem both these dudes
>>542309391
>>542309575>>Scientific racism>Do not embrace this terminology.This is the type of idiotic replies you get if you embrace that term:>>542313412
>>542313569>(You)
>>542310022>mud huts vs roman concrete
>>542309391There’s actually a big debate because of the amount of inbreeding about recognizing them as one species, science is an ever-shifting platform
