If you choose to ignore this warning, at least learn to swim.
He's right. We're going to start rounding up immigrants and jews and crucify them soon. Get out while you still can.
>>542344441
>>542344441waste of digits but God said he would burn the world next time not flood it.be more afraid of the fire coming from Space but before that will come pestalance and starvationCosmic Disturbances: The heavens disappearing with a roar and the elements being destroyed by fire (2 Peter 3:10; Joel 2:30–31). Global Warfare: Nation rising against nation and kingdom against kingdom (Matthew 24:6; Revelation 6:4). The Great Tribulation: A unique period of great suffering and persecution by the Antichrist, featuring false prophets and divine judgments like hail and fire mixed with blood (Matthew 24:21; Revelation 11:6).
>>542344612Interesting, you not only disproved climate change but also tides
>>542344612dude, the water is rising slightly. its just these photos were taken at different tide periods. the second one might be a low tide while the first was high tide. it's happening but not as fast as scientist claim. but the glaciers and icebergs are meltiing faster and not refreezing. but we could shift back into a new mini-ice age like the 1600s had and shit can repair itself. its just a matter of time meanwhile Super El Nino. California is going to have a fuckload of floods and landslides this year and early next
>>542344612nice attempt at disinformation. that might work if we did not know what "tides" are>Between 1901 and 2018, the global average sea level rose by 15–25 cm, with an increase of 2.3 mm per year since the 1970s. This was faster than the sea level had ever risen over at least the past 3,000 years. The rate accelerated to 4.62 mm/yr for the decade 2013–2022. Climate change due to human activities is the main cause of this persistent acceleration.
>>542344441This is why I wear a life jacket at all times under my clothes
So waterworld will become real huh, neat.
>>542344441I'm a remote viewer and I can remote view into the future and I already know with absolute certainty that I'll die from a massive tsunami hitting the East coast, but I refuse to move. This is my home. This is where I'll die. I know the exact moment of my death. I know the exact method of my death. And I'm fine with that. It is what it is. Who am I to buck fate or complain. We all have to die sometimes.
>>542344865we could however shift back into a mini-ice age.the last one in the 1500s-1600s happened when the first Europeans rolled up on California before settling. LA had snow in the hills and the mountain range were like glaciers. it suddenly stopped and came back again around the 1800s but for a much shorter period. we could shift into a massive ice age. everything you know now may become the last enjoying years before mass crops freeze off. we should prepare ourselves for industrial size artificial growing farms. because you wont be able to grow shit in Kansas being under ice and snow 10 months out of the year. it will feel like Alaska
>>542344925>glaciers ans ice bergs are meltingKNobody cares about this psyop anymoreAlso ice melting is not how water rises, its a bit more interesting than that tired old trope, but I wouldnt expect your script writers to have much beyond narration ;*
>>542345145>shift back into a mini-ice ageEurope will freeze when AMOC collapses
>>542344441That statue in the new mixican see looks epic.
>>542344577>I'm gonna do a thing2 more weeks, faggot
>>542344975>citation requiredWhich set of experts recorded these measured observations please
>>542345081every day I wake up and pray to whoever will listen to turn FL into an archipelago again>>542344761this, a carrington event and the JIT supply chain collapse is a much greater risk
>>542344441So move further inland? Where would you guys recommend? Kansas?
>>542345404https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
And then what? Swim to where?
>>542345404>Observations, models and paleo-evidence indicate that recently observed changes in the ocean are unprecedented for centuries to millennia (high confidence). Over the past four to six decades, it is virtually certain that the global ocean has warmed, with human influence extremely likely the main driver since the 1970s, making climate change irreversible over centuries to millennia (medium confidence). It is virtually certain that upper ocean salinity contrasts have increased since the 1950s and extremely likely that human influence has contributed. It is virtually certain that upper ocean stratification has increased since 1970 and that sea water pH has declined globally over the last 40 years, with human influence being the main driver of the observed surface open ocean acidification (virtually certain). A long-term increase in surface open ocean pH occurred over the past 50 million years (high confidence), and surface ocean pH as low as recent times is uncommon in the last 2 million years (medium confidence). There is high confidence that marine heatwaves have become more frequent in the 20th century, and most of those since 2006 have been attributed to anthropogenic warming (very likely) . There is high confidence that oxygen levels have dropped in many regions since the mid 20th century and that the geographic range of many marine organisms has changed over the last two decades.https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/chapter/technical-summary/
>>542345404>Current Arctic sea ice coverage levels (both annual and late summer) are at their lowest since at least 1850 (high confidence), and for late summer for the past 1000 years (medium confidence). Since the late 1970s, Arctic sea ice area and thickness have decreased in both summer and winter, with sea ice becoming younger, thinner and more dynamic (very high confidence). It is very likely that anthropogenic forcing, mainly due to greenhouse gas increases, was the main driver of this loss, although new evidence suggests that anthropogenic aerosol forcing has offset part of the greenhouse gas-induced losses since the 1950s (medium confidence). The annual Arctic sea ice area minimum will likely fall below 1 million km2 at least once before 2050 under all assessed SSP scenarios. This practically sea ice-free state will become the norm for late summer by the end of the 21st century in high CO2 emissions scenarios (high confidence). Arctic summer sea ice varies approximately linearly with global surface temperature, implying that there is no tipping point and observed/projected losses are potentially reversible (high confidence). https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/chapter/technical-summary/
>>542345112I know about California, and New York, several European cities will share a similar fate. Paris will be burned down by its own inhabitants for example.But do you know the time estimate? How lo,ng do we have?
>>542345404>It is likely that the Antarctic Ice Sheet has lost 2670 ± 530 Gt, contributing 7.4 ± 1.5 mm to GMSL rise over 1992–2020. The total Antarctic ice mass losses were dominated by the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, with combined West Antarctic and Peninsula annual loss rates increasing since about 2000 (very high confidence). Furthermore, it is very likely that parts of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet have lost mass since 1979. Since the 1970s, snowfall has likely increased over the western Antarctic Peninsula and eastern West Antarctica, with large spatial and interannual variability over the rest of Antarctica. Mass losses from West Antarctic outlet glaciers, mainly induced by ice shelf basal melt (high confidence), outpace mass gain from increased snow accumulation on the continent (very high confidence). However, there is onlylimited evidence, with medium agreement, of anthropogenic forcing of the observed Antarctic mass loss since 1992 (with low confidence in process attribution). Increasing mass loss from ice shelves and inland discharge will likely continue to outpace increasing snowfall over the 21st century (Figure TS.11f). Deep uncertainty persists with respect to the possible evolution of the Antarctic Ice Sheet along high-end mass-loss storylines within the 21st century and beyond, primarily related to the abrupt and widespread onset of marine ice sheet instability and marine ice cliff instability. (See also Boxes TS.3 and TS.4). https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/chapter/technical-summary/
>>542345404>Global mean sea level (GMSL) increased by 0.20 [0.15 to 0.25] m over the period 1901 to 2018, with a rate of rise that has accelerated since the 1960s to 3.7 [3.2 to 4.2] mm yr–1 for the period 2006–2018 (high confidence). Human activities were very likely the main driver of observed GMSL rise since 1971, and new observational evidence leads to an assessed sea level rise over the period 1901 to 2018 that is consistent with the sum of individual components contributing to sea level rise, including expansion due to ocean warming and melting of glaciers and ice sheets (high confidence). It is virtually certain that GMSL will continue to rise over the 21st century in response to continued warming of the climate system (Box TS.4, Figure 1). Sea level responds to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions more slowly than global surface temperature, leading to weaker scenario dependence over the 21st century than for global surface temperature (high confidence). This slow response also leads to long-term committed sea level rise, associated with ongoing ocean heat uptake and the slow adjustment of the ice sheets, that will continue over the centuries and millennia following cessation of emissions (high confidence) (Box TS.9). By 2100, GMSL is projected to rise by 0.28–0.55 m (likely range) under SSP1-1.9 and 0.63–1.01 m (likely range) under SSP5-8.5 relative to the 1995–2014 average (medium confidence). Under the higher CO2 emissions scenarios, there is deep uncertainty in sea level projections for 2100 and beyond associated with the ice-sheet responses to warming. In a low-likelihood, high-impact storyline and a high CO2 emissions scenario, ice-sheet processes characterized by deep uncertainty could drive GMSL rise up to about 5 m by 2150. Given the long-term commitment, uncertainty in the timing of reaching different GMSL rise levels is an important consideration for adaptation planning. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/chapter/technical-summary/
>>542345404>Box TS.4, Figure 1 | Global mean sea level (GMSL) change on different time scales and under different scenarios. The intent of this figure is to (i) show the century-scale GMSL projections in the context of the 20th century observations, (ii) illustrate ‘deep uncertainty’ in projections by considering the timing of GMSL rise milestones, and (iii) show the long-term commitment associated with different warming levels, including the paleo evidence to support this. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/chapter/technical-summary/
>>542344441too close for comfort on those digits son
mm
