Listen up /pol/, these are the reasons why the right has lost on the Charlie Kirk culture war and this is what I need to ask you all in order to patch things up.-"Counting or not counting gang violence" - what about white-dominated family annihilation stats and gang violence not being counted because white shooters intentionally target innocents and have higher rates? Remember the Mother Jones definition-2nd Amendment "Gun deaths are necessary" - What about guns' only purpose being to kill, unlike cars?-Were people cancelling people who celebrated merely for quoting him and making small jokes?-Was Erika grifting and being disrespectful by using fireworks?-What about the "pregnant daughter" comments?
Yids rape kids.
KikesKilledKirkIsrael dies woth Boomers
>>542345834Please don't say this around the left.
>>542345844The left is destroying the right on basic race/feminist topics here and and you want me to dive right into super fashy JQ content? Please don't switch topics
>>542345860Because they would feel personally attacked? Who cares.
>>542346014Because they'd hate you more for it
Refute this word for word please guys
Courtesy Zack Fox
>>542345751This happened because right in the US is mainly a vehicle for entertainment and some socialization, and has been since talk radio became big. The thing about entertainment is that entertainment can’t actually accomplish things, it just vibes like Kash Patel in a FBI windbreaker
>>542346380Yeah, but we need to look at the facts too
>>542345751Verify your claims nigger
>>542345751Leftoids live in a bubble. If you start saying you love luigi and you celebrate charlie kirk's death, nobody is going to challenge you because they think you're a psycho and they don't want to give you a target. It is as simple as that.
>>542346459You verify yours
>>542346122>63 percent of NFA violatersUnironically something to be proud of
>>542345751Gangs do target innocents all the time constantly, wtf are you talking about
>>542347444Yeah but usually they only target their opps, the standard mass shootings of only innocents are majority white unless you can tell me otherwise.Other than that, what about colonialism/world wars?
>>542346122I'll give you another (you)First, whites are still 56% of the US population. None of these (save the incest and the the NFA violations (again, based)) are that disproportionate, you just slipped in the "men" part to cut the stated population percentage in half. Second, as that mass shooter collage that gets posted around shows, the definition of "white" is pretty generous.
>>542345751>I can't stand empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made up, new age term, and it does a lot of damage.Is this a real quote? It sounds surprisingly unchristian. Was Kirk Nietzschean or something?
>>542347624>world warsJews>why jews?!?!?!Lurk for at least two years before you post again>colonialismIt was basedAny other dumb questions?
>>542345751Charlie Kirk is this generation's USS LibertyThe shape charge killed him, not the patsyEveryone knows itThe president is not going to embarrass our ally, damnit!
>>542348069How does everyone know that? There's no mainstream support for that idea. Do you think everyone secretly listens to and agrees with Candace Owens?
>>542345751>-"Counting or not counting gang violence" - what about white-dominated family annihilation stats and gang violence not being counted because white shooters intentionally target innocents and have higher rates? Remember the Mother Jones definitionThe reason he asked that is because the Mother Jones database, which contains all shootings in the past 45 years that meet their definition, only has 160 entries.The Gun Violence Archive counts several hundred mass shootings per year, because it includes (among other things) gang violence.It's impossible to accurately answer any question regarding mass shootings without specifying which definition you mean.>-2nd Amendment "Gun deaths are necessary" - What about guns' only purpose being to kill, unlike cars?Having a disarmed populace means granting the state an uncontested monopoly on violence.>-Were people cancelling people who celebrated merely for quoting him and making small jokes?Is anybody getting "cancelled" for the Kirkiversary? There was some backlash to the jokes, but that ended as soon as his body got cold. I'm certain you could find a guy who got fired or whatever in the immediate aftermath, but I don't think it was a broad trend.>-Was Erika grifting and being disrespectful by using fireworks?Yes. Kirk himself was a grifter, so I guess she's at least following his legacy.>-What about the "pregnant daughter" comments?I don't know what this is.
>>542345751>>542345860>>542345941>>542346058>>542346122>9 pbtid
