>you are brown or a woman or a lefty if you hate mass 1984 tier panopticon surveliece states no.flock cameras are pure concentrated government power and any libertarian or right winger who isnt alarmed by that is asleep. this kind of always on tracking network is dangerous as hell in the wrong hands because power always finds a way to get abused. look at the actual cases. cops all over the country have been using flock to stalk their exes and girlfriends. one milwaukee officer ran nearly 180 searches on his partner and her ex. a kentucky cop got charged after tracking his ex over 2000 times. there are dozens of these cases now with officers fired and arrested for treating the whole national plate database like their personal spy tool. when some random deputy can pull up your entire movement history without a warrant just because he is jealous or obsessed that is not law and order that is a police state featureand it does not stop at dirty cops. the same system gets used for political and social control. in texas a detective searched tens of thousands of cameras across the country to track a woman suspected of having an abortion. data from local cameras has been shared with federal agencies even when cities explicitly banned that. once the infrastructure exists the next administration or the next prosecutor or the next bureaucratic crusader can flip the switch and go after whoever they decide is the enemy that day. remember when standing too close during Covid was illegal? gun owners churchgoers people who attend certain rallies or just drive the wrong way too often. the founders did not write the fourth amendment so the government could build a permanent record of every free persons movements. handing that power to the state is how you get tyranny not safety.feds can suck my balls
Only beta basedboys hate Flock!
>>542377110eat shit glownigger
Soon you will be tracked down by the likes of these for saying no no bad words and wrong think
it's been obvious for awhile now that hating FLOCK is pro immigration. debate me on this !
lemme guess. Next will see "studies" come out correlating hating flock with small penis size. it's like a never ending circus, do they even realize how obvious all this is even to normie??
>>542377636Actually it's been statistically proven that being anti-flock correlates with long, thick, hard, juicy cocks. Studies men who hate being surveilled by the unconditional police state apparatus are 50x more likely to wake up to a hot 10/10 hyper aroused babe enthusiastic deepthroating they'd fat cocks ti completion.The facts just don't lie.
>>542377053The level of retarded propaganda concerning this is absolutly fucking insane. It is such an obviously evil thing that a lot of people, also of steongly disagreeing ideologies, will agree on it being obviously evil.
REMINDERTHIS is what flock shills look like >>542353570>100+ pbtid
>>542378121Rightists though, should feel somewhat flattered that it came out under Trump. I mean, the leftists hate it mostly for this reason. But it is more damaging, to the "right wing zeitgeist", building up Trump, and for higher IQ voters, RFK(I know, LOL, but actually), as alternative outsiders, the last maybe maybe maybe possibly do I just dare believe it non completely deepstate whaterveryawannacallem comped to shit puppets, and then have the Epstein and Iran and flock shit come out under that admin. They picked you to fuck with and try to break. They fear you more. Left wing opposition, not so much, apparently. Noice.
glowniggers tongue my anus
>>542378771
