Is it really that good?
>>542400533>CSAMUnrelated to the thread, but i fucking hate this algorythm friendly normiespeak and how it makes child porn sound like some War Thunder discussion>So anyway, he was caught with CSAM when he did SAP-HE on the APDFSDS after doing HEAT
>>542401325CSAM is just gay retard word for CP.
>>542400533Computer Science And Math?
>>542401325CSAM is designed to increase HEAT in my APPR (Armor Piercing Penile Round)
>>542401325some of those kids unalived themselves after being grapedshow some f*cking respect
>>542400533Oh, wow. A blurry cell phone picture of somebody.This is all the evidence I need.
>>542401325The kikes are purposefully changing language again.It’s cp.
>>542401452Unalived is triggering. They kermited sewer slide
>>542400533White guy, shocker. Who would've guessed.
>>542401532>>542401532I hate social media nuspeak. I hate the antichrist.
>>542401452
>>542400533>twitter thread>no twitter link
>>542401764You missed>allegation being made by one Alex (((Rosen)))
>>542401829Like literally anybody who made it past the (((Rosen))) part is a fucking reddit shitskin that needs to get the fuck out of here.
>>542401420Kid fuckers don't even typically wear condoms, let alone "armor", on their cocks. When armor isn't a factor, a hollow point round is generally a better bet for damage. But what happens when a pedophile is not a hapless caricature of a person and is actually ready and waiting for you to play hero? If they're okay with raping children, you can probably assume they're okay with laying traps and utterly brutalizing naive vigilantes who fall into them. Or at least, the ones you don't hear about on "predator hunter" media or true crime could be that way...
>>542400533>Is it really that good?My theory is that CSAM is becoming more prevalent because women are getting fatter and fatter.Men just don't like fat chicks. They don't even look like women after a point. They get hairy, smelly, sex is awkward and unenjoyable.But because women basically get fatter as they age, men are stuck going to younger and younger women and girls to get something actually female snapped.This theory would be supported if the majority of CSAM is for girls in the 14-17 age range, that generally have all their secondary sexual characteristics developed, and not younger.
>>542401359>>542401528They call it that to broaden the evidence category from "porn" to "media"; that way, defendants can't reasonably wiggle out of "porn"-related charges by claiming "I was just filming them taking a bath" or "look: their clothes are still on and they're not doing anything explicitly erotic." If you insert an object into someone but it's off-camera and all you see is the anguished face of the child in the video, that's not "porn", but it IS child sexual assault material (CSAM). So how exactly does that help predators or Jews? It doesn't - you just don't know anything and have a knee-jerk reaction to blame Jews or leftists for anything bad because you're filled to the brim with bitter resentment and fear, such that you allow ZOG to occupy your mind rent-free.
>>542401452i went to the grocery store and their literally selling grapes??? like wtf...
>>542402175also ease of access to the material compared to 15-20 years ago plays a huge part in the insane uptick in open pedos plus the lack of enforcement on filesharing sites or things like discord/tg/etc etc doesn't help much either
>>542402175I disagree. I think it's about innocence and power. People want to fuck kids because kids are helpless and moldable. Even if your suspected age range is correct, that could be due to other factors, such as availability of content and access to sexual willingness of the minors in question.
>all of a sudden /pol/ started used CSAM for all it's threads instead of CPwhat? too crude for you? I bet you say nigga instead of NIGGER
I mean apparently child sex abuse is so great or something my parents sexually abused me
>>542400533>csamIt's cp>texting minorschildren don't text, the adults that the state calls children do. If you allow kikes to play word games then you will always lose
>>542402487What specifically did they do to you, in graphic detail?
>>542401325this, can't fucking stand when i'm expected to be familiar with such degenerate shorthands
