>The great powers are modernizing their nuclear arsenals, IE new delievery methods and counter systems>The treaties and understandings that underpin deterrence are faultering>The hybrid wars are escalating and liberal democracies are struggling >Access to knowledge is accelerating with AI and strategic competition is impacted Do you belive in an open future or one of severe compartmentalisation?
That could mean a lot of different things
>>542410927Thinking in terms of gatekeeping knowledge and the means of obtaining knowledge. You have already restricted certain AI models to only serve an American audience. Akin to how dangerous technologies are gatekept, just on a wider basis. What i assume is that the future will be compartmentalized to a large degree as a means to project power and limit others abilities to do the same. Like cognitive warfare
>>542411104I expect that's part of the digital ID package. Each segment of the population will be served its own version of reality, depending on their age or religion or ethnicity or any number of other criteria.
>>542411446That is one way to do it. I suspect national compartmentalisation hits before domestic programs. But yeah, it's entirely plausible that a transnational program gets developed, might even be more likely..
>>542409209Nuclear weapons aren't real. You have the IQ of a dog.
>>542411104Read a book frenhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlKL_EpnSp8&ra=m
