>AI is just next token prediction>a stochastic parrot>autocomplete with extra steps>basically an upgraded google search>it'll never go anywhere or make any money>then this fad will die out>it's literally just averaging the internet>it's just wasting electricity and making everyone's bills go up>only good for generating images of dancing cats. trillion dollar industry or what?>humans make mistakes, but if an AI makes mistakes it's completely useless>did you say AI? haha did you see this two year old meme where AI cant say how many r's are in strawberry>inference costs money, therefore the business model can never work>they just prop it up with circular finance>it really should be banned
nothing brings out the clueless boomer out more on /pol/ than an ai thread
one problem that annoys me is there is trickery involved in AI responses for example if you ask something someone has already asked before they have a cached response ready to go. the AI didn't "think" anything before responding to you. i think actually MOST AI responses are cached now. this means if the HUMAN DEVS notice a cached response is wrong, they'll go in and manually edit it to be correct.this makes their AI seem "smart" but it wasn't, it just sent you a canned response that may have even needed tweaked by human hands to be correct because it wasn't correct when the AI first "thought" of it.
>>542438129if your prompt hits a cached response it will take that cached response and tell the AI to use the cached response as the basis for its response to the user and the AI takes the cached response and rewords it a bit and personalizes it as needed then sends it back to you.But all it did is rearrange the words a little essentially after hitting a cached response. This is fakery. It's the same as using a search engine, but if that search engine randomized the pages slightly every time you entered the same search query.
>>542438249that explains why it gets shit either so wrong or so right
>>542437786>clueless boomer>boomers love AI slopSchrodingers boomer
>>542438641I agree, projection is a strange trait to lean into.>"Why is the left against AI?">wander into AI thread>troons
