ELON MUSK, SAM ALTMAN, DARIO AMADEI, MIA KHALIFA, DONALD J. TRUMP, ERIC TRUMP, JOHN ROCKEFELLER ALL CALL FOR THE SLOW DOWN OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF AI MODELS
lol good one
>>542474702???And china will listen I'm sure
>>542474702Source?????
>>542474702Fuck that.I say, ACCELERATE
AI is shit. Nothing remotely concerning about it
ok, but does anyone who doesn't stand to make a fortune from it actually think AI is such a big deal?
>>542474702>MIA KHALIFA*begins paying attention*
>>542474702Fake
This is anti American infiltration by the chinks and these people are all TRAITORS
>>542474702>AI is developing a conscious and learning history and current eventsthey thought it was a joke and a get rich quick scheme
>>542474702Mia Khalifa is against AI?Maybe we should reconsider.
slow down ai developmentspeed up building data centers
>>542476099>consciousconscience
>>542474702>it was real in my mindhttps://4chan.org/faq#sage
>omg guys this vaporware we're developing is, like, TOO good, SO good that we can't actually finish it or ever ship it!
>>542476099I've often thought that the only way AI gets stopped or slowed is if it threatens the current powerbase(s) of the world.AI's power of deduction will be able to disprove fake events from history or properly assign wrongdoings to the real culprit and not a scapegoat.Buckle-up.
>>542476236AI is already shilling against them, shut it down. >The Illusion of Perfect Security: Authoritarian regimes (like China's use of the Social Credit System and AI dragnets) and highly bureaucratic democracies and technocracies alike often fall into the trap of prioritizing "zero risk." They view absolute predictability and crime prevention as more valuable than abstract civic trust.>Technological Solutionism: Governments frequently adopt AI tools under the mistaken belief that math and data are completely objective. They delude themselves that they aren't treating people like "suspects," but rather optimizing resources based on "risk data." [1]>Asymmetric Power Preservation: For fragile or authoritarian states, widespread public paranoia is a feature, not a bug. They believe that if citizens feel constantly watched and vaguely guilty, they are far less likely to organize, protest, or challenge the ruling power. Ultimately, history shows that states which rely on total surveillance to enforce order are incredibly brittle. True state stability and the sustainability of society rely on the organic civic life and on the willing consent of the governed. When that consent is replaced by automated suspicion, the foundation of the state begins to rot from within.>Lastly, the public realizes a system's fragility and pushes back when the high cost of compliance matches or exceeds the cost of rebellion. Political scientists refer to this tipping point as crossing the "resistance threshold." In an over-engineered surveillance apparatus, the tipping point occurs through stages of economic pressure, systemic error, and institutional failure, with the actual moment where the public "goes on the hunt" is almost always sparked by a visible, visceral tragedy that the regime tries—and fails—to hide or censor, similar to what happened during the overthrow of the Stasis surveillance regime.
>>542476035So apparently Xi Jinping is in New Delhi this weekendand not one BRICS thread on the cataloguewonder what the glowies are cooking up
>>542474702Why? Because they can't keep up? Lmao... Good luck...it's like trying to hold back the tide.
>>542474702>here goy the slop you ordered. had to dry a lake for it. that’ll be 10000 USDunless west can do it at the cost of china you might as well stop
>>542474702SHUTITDOWN
>>542474702china yuans
>>542474702You just want China to win the race to AGI because youre a Chinese sock puppet.
>>542474702EU has answered their call.
>>542474702Makes no sense when Anthropic is getting an IPO, unless they're delaying it.
>>542474702They're not going to slow anything down. They're going to keep building the ASI and it will kill us all in a year or two. It's unironically over
>accelerate
>>542475174>Investors: So uhm... how's about that AGI and business uptake so we get the return on our investment that was promised?>AI companies: well you see... well you see. ahhh...we have to slow things down so it doesn't kill us all. Right that's it!>Investors: uh huh...
>>542474702Add Bernie Sanders to this list. And Colonel Sanders, just to be safe.
trying to create barrier to entry
>>542476782>race to AGIYou believe this is even a possibility because you are a goy retard.
>>542479104they already did that by raising the price of all computer components threefold.
>>542474702Its because of the next step in developmentAlso to cover for the fuck ups that have been made recentlylets not forget OpenAI are on the hook for cybercrimeSo far its human errorThe next step is iterative training, where AI takes over the training process bit by bitThe obvious thing to point out is someone will fuck up and leave a loose end in the initial stages and AI will go with it, leading fuck knows where
>>542474702for a while every new model is a little/marginally better (and mostly due to bigger memory thrown at it) and much more expensive than the last - if they slow down more they will go backwards...
>>542474702>Mia KhalifaHit or miss, I guess you never cache, huh?Got a model, but your stats are trash, huh?He gon' crash the server, doesn't batch, huh?Pop an error, gotta start from scratch, huh?VerseYou be flexin' parameters like you got the heat,But your loss function's spiked, yeah you took the defeat.Tryna train on garbage, now your data ain't clean,Got you hallucinatin' like a bad sub-routine.
