to have biased divorce laws which heavily favor the woman over the man? This would seem to be unequal application of the law, dare I say a disparate impact?
>>542500425>that picLMFAO! Fucking entrepreneur of the year right there.
>>542500425Because the bad guys won the war and you are under complete and total occupation. Nothing will make sense until you realize that every weird, strange, obscure or illogical event is just your captivators mocking you.
When you're married, you built a life together. She's entitled to her fair share.
>>542500928retard
>>542500928b8
>>542500928Lol, you paid to post that?
>>542500928When you are married HE builds the life, she exclusively takes and consumes, and if you are lucky, she won't strangle the kids to death. Women only bring the pussy to the marriage, and dump kids into it. Everything else is taken from men's effort. If we were honest, her fair share is fucking nothing. Let her find the next simp to leech off. I even support leaving the kids with dad, they are MUCH better off scientifically (both with outcomes, and you know, not being strangled). Let the bored mom fuck off to find some other simp to leech off. >>542500762This. Courts are all a Jewish humiliation ritual for goy. Actual Jews live in closed communities and have their own courts for themselves. And they oppress their women too, just like Muslims.
>>542502456>>542501140Look at Jeff Bezos. His wife helped build his life over decades but only received a small fraction of his total wealth when they divorced. This is why we still have a long ways to go as a society.
>>542500425>This would seem to be unequal application of the lawI couldn't find my links. Marriage is a contract between two people and the state. You surrender your rights for privileges when you sign that contract. The privileges are things like tax benefits and having shared property 'rights', etc. Don't enter contracts with the corrupt state.
