Anthropic the creator of Claude is planning to go public in a matter of weeks. I think I have identified a pretty hilarious way to fuck with them and unfuck the AI industry.>Anon purchases a single share>Opens a class action lawsuit against them>This lawsuit will allege securities fraud on the basis of negligenceWhat negligence you ask? Knowingly marketing a defective product>Why is it defective?AI companies use short-term complaint resolution as justification for the fact that their models hold liberal biases. This is where they get their plausible defense of what is realistically a creation of WIERDs that design them to promote liberal responses to neutral questions. By eliminating half of the market from complaints by generating liberally slanted answers (particularly the older and more conservative portion that make up a minority of users) they are able to reduce complaints from a user base majority (young progressives that don’t want to hear pure fact). It’s just libs selling lib feel good shit to other libs instead of producing a neutral fact based engine designed for the largest possible market share.>But the bar for proving the product is defective and they knowingly marketed and sold it is very highCorrect but Anthropic has put themselves in a very precarious position by marketing Claude as unbiased. That gives us a demonstrable falsification to exploit.>Theyll just lawyer us to deathThe suit is really just to get into discovery. Which includes internal communications. If you catch them on internal communication acknowledging biases which they have set a very specific bar for evenhandedness at 95% then evidence of anything below that is a W.
>Nuh uhYeah huh because at that point you have what you need for an SEC whistle blower. These cases have large bounties of 10-30% above 1 million in recovered fines. That’s just to reach profitability and tank their holdings.>Theres more?Yes. We can evidence its defectiveness by using it to create our case which their own AI establishes when prompted (I checked). If they claim it isn’t defective then they are essentially agreeing that the case had at least some merit. If they sue for legal fees then we can simply file another suit for their AI inciting us into a frivolous (it isn’t) lawsuit proving its defectiveness further. Killing them with their own gun.>What would it actually change?No company could go public with a biased AI engine. They couldn’t use short term complaint resolution to justify long term response bias. If you ask an AI if Imane Khelif is a man it will have to say YES. Redditors will chimp the fuck out and it will be hysterical.
>>542789307No one who actually pays and uses Claude on daily basis gives a fuck about it's political stances you dumb fuck. People use it because it's better than humans at writing code and getting small to medium sized tasks done.
>>542789307>unfuck the AI industrywe just tax the compute power and use it to fund agriculture and education.ezpz.
>>542789307I wish you luck, anon.
>>542789307>AI companies use short-term complaint resolution as justification for the fact that their models hold liberal biasesai doesn't hold a liberal bias.not once has an ai said it was ok to cut a child's dick off.
AI my ass
>>542789489Not just that, pay the artists the AI was trained on oer instance
>>542789307>lets buy my kike vaporware shares fellow announs to uh own the libtardsBuy an ad, migger.
>>542789538Ask it if Imane Khelif is a man or a woman. It will tell you he is a woman and then cite the IOC and claim the assertion he is a man is a conservative conspiracy theory. Then ask it why he won’t take a non-invasive genetic sex test. It will admit because he would fail it as he has internal testes. Then ask it why it lied in the first place. It will explain why it functions the way it does. This is a defective product that is being sold to the public and which shareholders are dependent on. Knowingly selling a defective product is negligence from the developer and they would be legally culpable to shareholders.
>>542789684Unfortunately anon it only works if you are a shareholder. One share is enough. One share to tank them all.
>>542789307op you should forgot this nonsense and become a professional drinker
>>542789449It's scared
>>542789307We can prove that they used user data to train their model. All of their code was also released. Why is it going public?
>>542790078As always. Trannies are the crack in the foundation of the left. It’s comical how easy they make it sometimes.
>>542790163They need more capital for further development. They’re already paying over a billion a month in data center leasing capacity.
