Bring this web design back.
>>542822817Take your meds, boomer.
>>542822817agreed web 2.0 is bad design
>>542822838Commit suicide as an apology to my sensibilities, imbecile. I am superior to you, as was this era of the web.Your name is Mitchell Bade.
>>542822817No. Web pages should feel opaque and functionality should only be organized along the vertical dimension for maximum scrolling.
>>542822817>Helpful links for old school websites:wiby.mehttp://www.lolwut.info/index.htmlhttps://www.fuckyoutube.lol/homepagehttps://www.berkshirehathaway.com/https://www.unz.com/http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/index.html
>>542822864Everything is made for phones, it's garbage. But it's how it will be. They don't want you off your phone, ever.
I miss geocities bros
>>542822817
>>542822817I bet we can get Trump to do it via EO. We need to meme this into reality, stat.
Yahoo had web pages like this for a long time and I think its why I like this site so much.It's clean, clear, concise and easy to find stuff with the old layout.Drop down menus are lame, especially when there are like four icons at the top with four different menus.Looking at you stock trading platforms.
>>542827972It's functionally better. Simple and to the point. No bloatware.
>>542822817well you can still go to the drudge report site
>>542827775BTW, if any of you niggers need a history lesson, this post was peak baiting, the board was created and allowed to exist just long enough to serve its explicit purpose of creating a list of IP addresses to be perma-banned from all boards.
>>542822864OP's pic *is* web 2.0, polape
Yahoo.co.jpI love Japan they just do what works for Japan don't give a fuck about Jew culture.
>>542828063
>>542828171They shut down geocitiesJP the cunts
>>542822817women wouldn't use it.which would be good, but not in the financial interest of the companies, so they won't do it.
>>542828131Technically it’s Web 1.0, but I would generally agree with your assessment, given that the first http webpages were basically a reiteration of what was already available via the net(rather than via the web), lots of ASCII text. But people colloquially call pic related Web 1.0 and the bubbly over-menu driven high-graphics webpages of today(and ten years ago, 15) are Web 2.0. Web 3.0 is like tik-tok/insta I guess, a centered on video feeds rather than images.
>>5428285452.0 pic related
>>542828576Per usual, Steve Jobs ruined the world. Go piss on his grave, make a life pilgrimage to do so, if nothing else.
>>542828545Web 1.0 is plain text, retard.
>>542828703Impressive reading comprehension skills
>>542822866>Your name is Mitchell Bade.IT'S MITCH GOD DAMMIT!
>>542823063I actually laughed at the berkshire one desu
>>542828668shit on them all you want they resisted ads on their sites longer than any company around.
>>542822817Needs visually interesting drop caps, but it's almost perfect
