Amazon and other corporations are buying rare books and destroying their spines in order to scan the content and upload it for AI training. Is there any evidence that they're also destroying the de-spined pages rather than archiving them somewhere?
>>542831758wouldn't an actual AI be able to read books on its own without destroying them?
>>542831829Yes, but its about sending a message and securing all the training datasets.
>>542831829best they can do is glorified google search
>>542831758I believe it was court ordered kikery, that by destroying the book the only 'copy' is baked into the AI, so it's not copyright infringement so some bullshit like that. Personally I think every books they do this to that is public domain should be released to the world for free in a massive digital library.
>>542831758scamazon is nothing but izzat related fraud and ecoli covers scamsPeople should stop using them until they bring jobs home. And if they want to replace Humans with indians let them measure their stock prices in rupees.
copyright is jewish law and therefore not valid
>>542832001We already have the ability to take a picture of text and have it read by a machine.The only reason for destroying these books is to limit avalibility.
>>542831829the point of destroying is to prevent other AI companies from using the same books for trainingit's despicable
>>542831758>MUH RARE BOOKSIf they were any good then there would be a million of them.
>>542831919>>542831758you will not be given access. ask AI right now to quote you something. it flat out refuses. it supposedly has access to all information but refuses to share any of it.these tools suck ass. midwif machines and consensus engines to generate compliance, surveil everything, and help the Lowest Common Denominator blend in.let that sit for a minute. it's not x, it's y.
>>542831829no because you can't flip through a book that fast. they're separating the paper so they can mass scan the content for the AI to "read."
>>542832036It's actually much simpler than that.Mass book scanners with slice through the book binding to release the loose pages into the scanner so that the binding doesn't warp the scanned image, like they show in the video. There are ways of avoiding this when doing serious book archival, but that assumes anyone at these companies will care to take the time.
>>542831758>are they tossing them once they are doneYes for copywrite reasons supposedly
>>542832143the stated reason is because it fulfills the copyright loophole they invented for precisely this. they invented copyright in the first place to protect Hollywood and now that it's served its purpose they're pivoting. the AI won't give you access to anything it has scanned because of copyright, but they're allowed to scan it because they also destroyed it which makes it transformative.you can copy a book so long as you destroy the book. is the bullshit they came up with to justify this Library if Alexandria bullshit they're doing.it's all intentional. they're using insane budgets.>>542832172like your Morning Glory Milking Farm
>>542832084based and correct, but that judaism is the only way the "western world" works.If people just ignore the Berne Convention, you'd see a lot of screeching boomers getting shitted on by legitimatized clones from Asia, en-masse. Once you realize the "turd-worldists" are right and that the Western world is literally a hyper colonialism wealth extraction machine, you begin to really understand just how retarded the world is.
>>542831758kike worshipping christcucks destroyed 99% of ancient books just like that. typical yahweh worshipper behaviour.
those "rare books" they're scanning are from the 70's onward. the type of books that regularly get thrown out of libraries and land in the trash because nobody wants them even for free. they're not destroying Luther Bibles.
>>542832564not all books need to be popular. in fact, the more and best selling the work, the worse it is
>>542832314>the stated reason is because it fulfills the copyright loophole they invented for precisely this.No, the reason is that a bound book is really shitty for OCR technology at scale whereas a bunch of pieces of flat paper is betterYou're just making shit up at this pointThere is no information being destroyed here, they're just removing the bindings to make it easier to digitizeThey're counting on your emotional response of "ZOMG NAZIS BURNED BOOKS LIKE THIS" to sway your opinion
>>542831829You mean a hand scanner? Sure I suppose but it takes longer.Also this has been happening since 2016 and I didn't hear you faggots complaining then
>>542832648Actually, the fact that they're indiscriminately destroying out of print books and will never release that information back to the public is wayyyyy worse than the nazis, who only burned and very intentionally burned books that were completely modern of the time and related to deleterious medical operations that should've never been published. Maybe they accidentally threw out some useful reconstructive surgery research but for the most part. This is actual history being lost, it's hard enough to find old books in good condition, even if they are from the 70s onward. That's still history and may be important for future generations.
>>542832648>There is no information being destroyed hereNo, they just make sure you can't find the information they disagree with when you ask the AI they fed the books into.Physical stores of information are dangerous. You never know what people have in books or on DVDs or otherwise in their house. It could be any sort of misinformation. That's why we need the jews running AI companies to destroy the books and use AI to disseminate only approved information.
>>542831829If the books a problematic they can get rid of them. I suspect alot are not novels but chronicles/histories/legers...etc. They could have very damning evidence agianst the narrative.
>>542831758it doesnt matter, the point is this way they can decide who gets access to what information if they're the only remaining source.every question that isnt about how they're limiting public access to information this way is a red heering
>>542831758They are mandated to destroy to comply with copy right laws.
>>542831758Why are books holy to you weirdos? Nobody cares
>>542832414I’d destroy every book on earth except the Bible just to make (You) mad
>>542832647Anon there is a lot of trash out there. Rare trash is still trash.
>>542831758You know 100% a jew came up with this process because you don't actually need to destroy books in order to scan them, even more so with AI as a tool nowadays.
>>542832200You’re using it wrong, ask about the topic and it will draw from that, it obviously won’t agree to just give you a free book though
>>542833899kike yahweh is proud of your services. his most obedient goycattle golem.
>>542831758Physical Bibles are going to be in high demand.
>>542831758I have heard the empty phrase "rare books" used so many times but not a single one of these "rare books" actually named
Why the fuck would they go through the trouble of saving the pages after they've cut the spines off the books? Why the fuck would they even cut the spines off when there are other methods of scanning available that doesn't destroy the books?Fuck you, that's why.
>>542831919Based data goblinsI'm just joking they're assholes but it's kinda funny
>>542834508I think it's funny when shitskins try to moralize like this, with YOUR history. Portraying yourselves as the default good guys. Hilarious.
>>542831758>oh no, they're taking a physical book rotting away in a university library basement and digitizing it so it's available to all
>>542836350The whole point of buying them off is to destroy the books so no other company can get them retard
>>542832665>since 2016That's precisely the moment when /pol/ went to shit with invasion of migatards.
>>542838836their not making it available for all you cuck
>>542831758>Is there any evidence that they're also destroying the de-spined pages rather than archiving them somewhere?Yes. A recent court ruling makes it clear that this action does not infringe copyright if they destroy the book so that one copy (the model's "memory" of the book) is all that remains. The legal department is thus making sure that the de-spined pages aren't archived, as that would constitute copyright infringement liability.
>>542831829They destroy the physical copy so technically they aren't copying the book, it's a legal loophole. They're only allowed to own one copy they haven't licensed it
>>542836722Something something beautiful oak door
>>542831758Are you an anti AI terrorist, anon? Sounds like it. Do you want China to win?Better send this to the FBI
>>542836722if you weren't a retarded amerigoy slave you'd understand that islam is just another form of yahweh worship and wouldn't think you're talking to a muslim just because of the flag. but that's a lot to expect from a peasant cattle like you.
>>542831758Yeah of course they go straight into the garbage.Why would they let that shit exists when their competition could use it.
>>542831758The depressing thing about kike shit like this is that even if tomorrow there was some revolution, the destruction of these originals is permanent. You can preserve what was saved by the AI, even in a better non-Jew country's AI, but there will always be a layer of doubt needed when reading the "originals." You will always have to doubt everything because the possibility that AI changes under a given political system in time edited it to its own bias. Just more permanent loss of things that can't come back ever. And people cheer this on.
>>542839871>>542839701no this doesnt make any senseat the time of the action they ARE copying the booki think this answer spammed here is disinformation
>>542831758the rare Webster's Dictionary.
>>542836350>other methods of scanning available that doesn't destroy the books?slow as fuck
>>542841333kek!>original first edition mein kampf gets on the chopping block
>>542842660I've got an old bible with annotations in the margins. Used to belong to some guy named Martin Luther. You can chop that up and scan it if you want.
>>542831758This kills the crab.
>>542831758The real agenda of AI companies is to be the forever gatekeeper of information. It's all about controlling the narrative. It's no coincidence that every major AI company is headed by jews. This is real book burning. At some point, jews will have to be permanently stopped.
