98% of executions in Iran are for males, despite women committing 20% of murders and more than half of treason cases.
>>542843787Yeah they're lowkey kind of cucked, that's why their birth rates are terrible
>>542843844Thats the real red flag for Iran. If they win against murrika they import mulim niggers en masse to resplenish.
>>542843844In Saudi it's even worse. More than 99% of executions are for males.Also, in both Iran and Saudi Arabia DNA tests are considered unislamic and men are by law forced to be the fathers even if the test says they're not.
>>542843983
>>542843983so many lies and headcanons in one post
>>542844154What did I get wrong
>>542843787Wow its women cucking trump in the strait?!
>>542844206The DNA part? It's legal to prove parenthood and benefits from wider application cases than western countries like France. The only case where it's not allowed is when there's not even a probable risk of betrayal in the couple. If there is any (not a proof, but risk), it is always allowed. DNA testing "just for the sake of it" is outright banned in Saudi. In Iran, it's up to the discretion of the judge and often allowed nonetheless. The Firash rule still dominates, but courts routinely use DNA to resolve timely, formal objections.Needless to say that a pre-existing DNA test, like one done through companies like MyHeritage with the mobile of being curious to know the ancestry of your progeny are also valid credible evidence that warrant recourse to a judge approved DNA test. So even when there's no issues in the mariage or proof of treason in Saudi, one can just proceed to a DNA test of their progeny to "check their ancestry and learn about history" or "check genetic defects" and use it to in a trial.In other terms, both Saudis and Iranians have far more permissive jurisdiction on the matter compared to nearly all western countries.
>>542844812>DNA testing "just for the sake of it" is outright banned in Saudi. In Iran, it's up to the discretion of the judgeSo I was right.>Needless to say that a pre-existing DNA test, like one done through companies like MyHeritage with the mobile of being curious to know the ancestry of your progeny are also valid credible evidence that warrant recourse to a judge approved DNA test.So they have issue with DNA tests except when they're used to prove a woman is an evil adulterous whore. That's even worse than what I said.
>>542845231No, and no. First, as i said before, there's almost no christian country (or at least none that i know of) that has a more lenient policy. They don't have an issue with DNA tests per se. As i already said, a personal DNA test can be used to justify an official one.But a personal DNA test cannot be used as direct evidence as you could use anyone's genetic material to make it. There's no state mandated nurse proceeding to the collection. It's as simple as that.>So they have issue with DNA tests except when they're used to prove a woman is an evil adulterous whore.Neither. You're using semantic shifts and elementary means of sophistic manipulation to push the goalposts. Your initial premise was that those societies were anti-male because of DNA parenthood issues. I dismantled your flawed argument, and in doing so, had to explain how DNA testing jurisdiction is done in said countries in cases of adultery. The opposite extreme of your first point isn't true either. In other matters such as murders or any other case where DNA evidence is relevant, it is just as frequently used as in cases of adultery.
>>542845845>a personal DNA test can be used to justify the RECOURSE TO* an official one.Meaning that your DNA test to see if your child has genetic predispositions can be used as credible evidence to warrant a court issued official test to prove parenthood, which, to my knowledge, is illegal in all western countries.
>>542843787Why bother executing women when you can just put them near military objectives while fighting the USA?Win-win
If Iran ever fails it will be because of their women, as all the great civilization before them and after them.
