Thunderf00t's baking soda solution for global warming works it FFFFFING WORKS!!!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BURK4KYzkE
>>542851508Why is he so misshapen? What genetic defect makes him look like that?
>>542851788Inbreeding depression from a small gene pool of the British isles.
>>542851508>snake oilhow did this sad fella drop so fucking low? you cannot logically fight against carbon release, it's not something that makes any scientific sense.what you end up doing is paying for someone else's dirty energy in another country>africa burns dirty fuel -> releases carbon>you try to capture said carbon -> you use MORE energy than Africa got out of their carbon fuel, to put it back in the ground.>you pay for their energy + extrathis is utter rubbish and shouldn't even be allowed by fellow scientists
>>542851788High IQ people are ugly because they have never reproduced on the basis of natural sexual attraction and never will>>542852097>HOW CAN SEQUESTRATION BE REALUse an energy source that doesn't generate nearly as many greenhouse gases or particulates as you're capturing, ezpz
>>542852263>Use an energy source that doesn't generate nearly as many greenhouse gases or particulates as you're capturing, ezpzbro are you literally braindead retarded? what the actual fuck is wrong with your logic you brainlet??IF YOU HAVE AVAILABLE CLEAN ENERGY YOU USE IT FOR YOUR OWN SHIT NOT FOR NEGRO RELEASED CARBON YOU FUCKING IMBECILE
>>542851508thunderfoot baking soda formula is the same one he uses to treat his jock itch and fungal foot problem
Yeah, but he's an atheist and therefore and enemy of /pol/. The white man believes in Jesus Christ and he blesses Israel.
>>542852097Well, there's a place for it. Usually it's just copium spewed by companies dependent on fossil fuels and the politicians they've bribed, because they can pretend they're working on a magic solution while not actually doing anything, but as we get closer to net 0 emissions, it might turn out carbon capture is mode efficient or more practical than getting rid of that last few percent.
>>542852385What if we don't need that much energy, or negro carbon?
>>542851788Dude is like 6'5" tho
>>542851508Yeah sure.His baking soda volcano at the science fair worked too.So what.
>>542852686I mean yeah they gotta play pretend>>542852702>What if we don't need that much energy>flaglmao even. the only way carbon capture makes sense is if everyone stops fossil fuel use. else you're just paying for their clean energy + extra on top (efficiency losses). so whoever is doing the capture is paying out of their own pocket.might as well directly deliver clean energy to said countries, you at least cut the efficiency loss cost.it's really that fucking simple. coal is basically C, carbon + some impurities. burn with oxygen and you get C + O2, so CO2, and some energy out of it. To split C and O2 back you need to put back the same amount of energy + some losses, capture the carbon, dig a hole, bury it back into the earth. basically do a reverse mining operation.it's way simpler to like...not mine it in the first place. literally cheaper in the end to like...not use it, if you are going to capture it. else it's just a silly game everyone plays.
Haha so what if water vapor condensed CO2 back to solids on the earth as part of the carbon cycle this whole time haha?>baking sodaOkay but why?
>>542851508Whatever did happen to VenomFangX? Did he troon out in the end?
>>542851788haters gonna hate.
Let me guess before watching: carbon dioxide is oxidized. So he's proposing a mechanism to reduce the carbon's oxidation
>>542853648>Okay but why?because it works (apparently) and you can piggyback on existing industries. sodium is already produced in vast quantities as a byproduct of the PVC industry and passenger airliners can spread it in the stratosphere.
>>542854942wrong. stratospheric aerosol injection.
>>542854988Huh, but water is free and already does all that for free?
>>542855092he's "capturing CO2" with the production of Sodium BiCarbonate ? Ehhh.. it's interesting but is it scalable? I'll have to read more on this
>>542851788His face seems to be correctly proportioned. It's just his hair and beard that are awful. >>542852263>High IQ people are ugly because they have never reproduced on the basis of natural sexual attraction and never willWomen aren't attracted to "natural sexual attraction" in men. They're attracted to his resources. Your analogy is also false. The highest IQ men are the ones who tend to become the richest and most successful, attracting the most attractive women and then passing on attractive genes to their children.
>>542851508>schizo autist perennial lolcow is drawn so deeply into self-importance and the threat of global warming that he manages to figure out a way to stop it next you'll tell me j.f. gariepy will be completely vindicated on the revolutionary phenotype and getting away with killing his wife.
>>542851508People still listen to this worthless D student faggot? Imagine all the resources wasted on him when so many could've blown this retard out of the water with such a path, it's about dysgenics, it's about shitty people placating society endlessly for their value, a value system also sick and twisted and who sets that standard, no wonder the west seek to replace themselves with third world animals, absolute faggotry...
>>542854988why not install it in all emission centers instead?? like power plants, cars, whatever releases carbon? like catch that shit at the source?it's always some sort of convoluted action to make it look like we're doing something about it, but it is always the most retarded action of all available ones, it just looks good politically and for pleb. you get more out of it if you capture at source, because even if you go for the one in the atmosphere, it's more work, and carbon is still being released. instead of chasing it in the fuckign stratosphere just do it at source, in your car's exhaust.this shit is all so fucking tiring bros
>>542855320because those are quickly washed out by the weather, unlike stratospheric aerosols.
>>542855423what? what is washed out? are you saying removing all carbon from your car's exhaust is worse than flying planes and releasing chemicals in the stratosphere? is that what you are saying?
>>542852097He doesn't want to remove carbon dioxide from the air he is proposing releasing particles of baking soda of a particular size in to the atmosphere to reflect Sun's energy back in to the space.
How much money has this turkey grifted via grants for his retarded work?
>>542851508This nigger is pretty smart until you realize he promotes the fake moon landings. He doesn't realize Canadians would obliterate Americans if need be.
>>542855700maybe he should try that on Venus, see how that goes.we also try to have as clean air as possible not add fine particles to it.
>>542855700>>542856130also if shit goes south is there a reverse procedure for it? like clean them all up?
>>542856260It must be continuously released in to the atmosphere because over time it fells on the ground and greenhouse effect of the carbon dioxide returns
>>542851508am i supposed to know who the fuck this is? i don't give a shit. sage this fucking bullshit
>>542856507my air sensor looks for pm2.5 and pm10 particles in air. high reading is le bad.what he is showing there is even smaller ones. like an order of magnitude smaller. how do we know they fall, they don't cause health issues, they don't linger, they're not picked up by wind, etc and all that jazz?
>>542852097brexit mind-broke himthe guy had a EU stipend so he was shilling hard for remain and then it didn't happen and he was never the same again afterwards
>>542852097>>you try to capture said carbonyou just bound it in plant matterit's not that complicated. This is how nature did it for millions of yearsWhatever baking soda retardation thunderfag is doing obviously makes no sense. Not even watching this crap
>>542855271>Women aren't attracted to "natural sexual attraction" in men.>thisorthatLmfao
>>542851508>ECELEB THREAD ECELEB THREADAll fields.
My experience with (natural) scientists and high-iq people is that they are no different than normies when it comes to politics. They believe the mainstream media and most don't care enough to inform themselves better.
>>542856876It is very simple, you release tiny particle of baking soda in to the stratosphere to reflect part of the Sun's energy back in to space to counteract the greenhouse effect of carbon dioxide which was released by burning fossil fuels.
>>542856876I didn't watch it either so my bad for assuming it was about carbon capture, but aparently it's not carbon capture, is actually fucking with particles in atmosphere to cool Earth down. it's really dangerous shit.>>542856823yeah I remember back in the day his science videos were cool and interesting but he like...lost it at some point. might be due to what you said
>>542851788>There are ten-million-million-million-million-million-million-million-million-million particles in the universe that we can observeYour mama took the ugly ones and put them into one nerd
>>542851508Probably a question for /sci/ since they're a little less retarded than here but does anyone know how promising this is for geoengineering compared to sulfur dioxide?
>>542851508How much carbon dioxide is in the atmosphere? >0.3%
I dream of the day when we can go back to the ice age
Are these particles safe? And can they stay in atmosphere long enough? I remember reading something that such aerosols must be injected very high, where the flow is laminar to make them last a long time.
he began attacking elon musk in every video…if you are wondering why there is an active bot campaign against a guy from the ‘00s. https://youtu.be/B71PNEwhyXc
>>542856876>you just bound it in plant matteryes and no. indeed there's more green mass on the planet than ever before, at least in any kind of recent time. exactly because there's so much co2, and plants literally feed on it, so basically earth is greener than ever due to this. so plants do absorb some of it yeah.but it's still temporary storage. when plants die they rot away, and that releases the carbon back in the air.the only sustainable method is to constantly cut down mature trees, pyrolyze them, and bury them. that's the actual way of burying carbon. what you are left with after pyrolysis is activated charcoal. pure carbon.https://youtu.be/nGMAErpQOS4but you'd have to have a world wide infrastructure for practicing this, it's literally the reverse of mining. so in the end it's again cheaper to like not get it out of the ground than doing all of this process to bury it back.it's seriously majorly fucked, because this is a physics issue, it's simple math. you cannot capture if you do not stop mining it, it makes no sense economically. and other solutions are not fixing it, rather dealing with the effects of it, like reflecting the sun's heat and shit. bleak stuff
>>542857995>the only sustainable method is to constantly cut down mature trees, pyrolyze them, and bury them.sea plants absorb it too and it just burries itself at the bottom of the ocean. also if you only use the short cycle of CO2, you don't add up to its levels. it's very eco. Burning fossil fuels isn't eco, but also you won't create more carbon than there ever was on the surface. Unless there's a lot of carbon in the mantle. But eggheads say that all our fossil fuels come from organic matter, so idk. If that's the case we couldn't ever go much over 4% of CO2, cause that was the max level that we had on Earth in history
>>542852097This guy is an IQ test. He's in the category of people who see the market going up, it doesn't make sense to them, so they start screaming it's fake. It's the same retards who claim covid wasn't real too because they couldn't "see" the virus and couldn't "believe" the government had the power of ordering preventive lockdowns that people would obey.In short when their shallow understanding of reality doesn't match reality, instead of adapting their views, they deny it. In the modern sea of internet lies they both get to catch on on some tricky conspiracies and be correct, and also be comically, jarringly wrong about most of their claims anyway. (Mind you, I'm never vaccinated)For this guy, an example is Tesla and SpaceX. He doesn't get economics in 2026 doesn't work according to how many pounds of gold Fort Knox holds, even though it kinda once did, so he refuses to accept Musk can be so rich based on making lofty promises and delivering some nifty tech demos. But actual intelligent people took note of this reality and adjusted their lives accordingly. Hence you get zoomers invested in 401ks in record numbers to stay on the side of the gravy train, at least while it runs and the music plays. We might yet see the first pound of martian uranium mined in our lifetimes, and servers on the moon. If it won't be Musk's crazy launch system, it will be the Chinese.
>>542851508
>>542858790it's not just carbon in the air. it's carbon + oxygen.before cyanobacteria popped up here there was almost no oxygen in the air. so there is enough carbon to steal all of the oxygen (as CO2). theoretically.
>>542858790>>542859280as in there is so much available carbon that it can fully steal all the oxygen in the air. the actual limit for CO2 is as much as is available oxygen for it. well, up to some point anyway when it becomes hard to find it in the air to bind it to carbon.cyanobacteria basically used sunlight to break CO2 into carbon and oxygen. thus carbon based life, they stored the carbon/used it and released O2 in the atmosphere which started to increase in concentration with time.
>>542854988Yeah bro. Let spray something that was never in the atmosphere. Surely nothing can go wrong
>>542855271>Women aren't attracted to "natural sexual attraction" in men. They're attracted to his resourcesI'll save you years of stupid grief. Women aren't attracted to money. At all. Women are attracted to men being above them.Taller, stronger, richer, more competent, more (usefully) knowledgeable, more successful, more charming. What's the difference? You can bag a hot, rich woman if you can dress well and have a charming smile, and still train her to be obedient. You just need to take decisions she's insecure about and look competent, while using her own money to do so. Even if she knows you're a scam she'll be wet. Because you're reassuring to her instincts by succeeding where she can't. Likewise you can be a drug dealing mulatto thug and be irresistible to daddy's girls at night clubs by being aggressive and dominant, unlike her college Timmies, and unlike the slippery chads who always act like they're too good to call her. If you're strong and all over her she'll like you. The only way women seem unreachable is that they're not settling for a guy who doesn't know what to do anymore, because men are whipped by feminist laws into treating women like dangerous bombs. Being afraid of losing money or reputation over a woman (a very real possibility these days) is a major turn off to her.
'jak bait
>>542853047This whole planet is covered with carbon-capture devices. They're called "plants."
>>542857995>when plants die they rot away, and that releases the carbon back in the air.>the only sustainable method is to constantly cut down mature trees, pyrolyze them, and bury them. that's the actual way of burying carboninteresting. wouldn't burning the charcoal still release co2?>you'd have to have a world wide infrastructure for practicing thiswhat if you build a big solar heating box to pyrolize all kinds of organic stuff? would that help?
>>542851788?He is handsome.>>542851508I am, however, not going to watch this video.
>>542851508I don't get it.But I'm real happy for you though. Thanks for saving the planet, thundz.
>>542851508Plants sequester carbon.They do it for free, like jannies.
>>542855246He's not trying to "capture CO2"0,3-0,5 micron sized particles would reflect light off and thus counteracting heating upCO2 is here to stay for generations before nature can scrub it to normal levels
>>542855631It isn't a CO2 filterIt reflects sunlight in the upper atmosphere
>>542855631His idea is to burn sodium, the metal, not table salt. You suggest doing that in cars? Insane, and completely misunderstands the mechanisms proposed. Stop posting.
>>542852097Yes
>>542857909It's baking soda. It falls eventually, "long enough" if you keep doing it.
>>542863156Burning charcoal would release the CO2 back into the atmosphere, which is why you bury the charcoal underground so it can't be burned. Since charcoal is mostly indigestible it won't rejoin the short carbon cycle for a long time. The process is simple and can be done in many ways but the problem is scale. To push climate all the way back to pre-industrial levels through carbon capture alone you'd need to bury around two trillion tons of charcoal.
>>542851508Driving humanity to extinction would also stop climate change.
>>542851508Its so entertaining, you thought you brought the anti-christ back and your prophecy was being fulfilled.Have you realized yet?AHAHAHAHA
>>542863156>interesting. wouldn't burning the charcoal still release co2?of-course. hence why you'd bury it. which is retarded. imagine a truck full of it on highway to get to bury site going next to truck coming from a mine with mined coal. would be kinda retarded overall. it would be cheaper to wait outside the mine, buy the mined coal (it would be cheaper per tonne) and go bury it back.which again, makes the whole thing pretty fucking retarded lol.>what if you build a big solar heating box to pyrolize all kinds of organic stuff? would that help?don't think the pyrolysis energy is the issue here. you can use it from the volatiles in organic matter. you'd release some carbon but energy would be free already there extracted from plants.the uge cost in the whole work and gear. and it would be literally braindead retarded if you mine it anyway a few miles away
>>542865088>>542865316I did mention I did not watch the video so I didn't know it was reflecting nonsense. it's still dumb anyway. as in dangerous and fixing the symptom not the cause.
>>542865565Huh, starting to realize there isnt actually much of a cost to anything. And you are all being rorted by jews chasing money. Cos they dont actually do anything that creates it.
>>542851508Lol, that asshole's finally lost his mind.
>>542851788>Why is he so misshapen? What genetic defect makes him look like that?he is Sam Hydes biological father
>>542865641the cost of mining it is in mining gear, infrastructure, transport, processing, land use etc.capturing carbon is logically dumbfuck retarded as long as you are mining it.it will always cost less to go in front of mine and buy all that is mined and bury it back. which in itself is ludicrous.but working the steps helps everyone understand just how fucking retarded the carbon capture proposition is as long as anyone is still mining it. it's simple logic really, hidden behind layers and layers of money interests and politics.the general idea is that as long as it's cheaper to mine than to use green energy it will be mined. if not by you then by some thirdie shithole. ends up in the same place we all breathe, the fucking atmosphere.
>>542865905A race to the bottom. A world of consumers and none of creation.
>>542857502ERB quote?
>literally writhes in pain at the sight of a woman>anti Trump liberalI just don’t understand him.
>>542865954well yes. hence mass culling or global dictatorship imposing strict rules by force, on everyone.
>>542865565>and it would be literally braindead retarded if you mine it anyway a few miles awaywhat if you use it to produce diesel, like the chinese do?
Something I've always wondered, would white phosphorus work for geoengineering? To my knowledge it produces smoke at around the same particle size for mie scattering and it ignites spontaneously in the air without need to carry a second reactant. Of course environmental agencies keep telling me that I am never getting their permission to pump white phosphorus into the atmosphere and find out but I really want to know if it would at least block sunlight efficiently.
>>542851508>global warmingNobody believes in this fake and gay shit anymore, it's global cooling, the science™ is settled.
>>542851508Has this faggot ever gotten over being rejected by Anita Sarkisian or whichever one of those cunts he had a crush on?
>>542851508footfags get the rope
